Biochar uygulamalarının marul (Lactuca sativa L.)’un bazı kalite parametreleri ve verimi üzerine etkisi

Tarım topraklarının fonksiyonlarının ve bitkisel üretimde gelişimin sağlanması bakımından biochar kullanımı artmaktadır. Ancak Biochar'in bitki gelişimi üzerine etkisi biochar kalitesindeki yüksek çeşitlilikten dolayı farklı olabilir. Bu çalışmada farklı biyokömür uygulamalarının marul gelişimi üzerine etkisi iki farklı yetiştirme döneminde saksı denemesi olarak sera koşullarında belirlenmiştir. Biyokömürler dört farklı tarımsal atıktan [Bağ budama atığı (Vitis vinifera L.), Domates atığı (Solanum lycopersicum L.), Muz Plantasyon atığı (Musa) ve Karanfil atığı (Dianthus caryophyllus. L.)] 300°C ve 500°C sıcaklık değerlerindeki yavaş piroliz işlemiyle elde edilmiş ve toprağa uygulanmıştır. Çalışma, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 5 tekerrürlü olarak 9 uygulama şeklinde gerçekleşmiştir. Uygulamalar, kontrol, VB300, TB300, BB300, CB300, VB500, TB500, BB500 ve CB500 uygulamalarını kapsamaktadır. Deneme 4 tarımsal atık × 2 piroliz sıcaklığı × 5 tekerrür + 5 kontrol olmak üzere toplamda 45 uygulama konusundan oluşmaktadır. NPK (18.18.18) ve Kalsiyum Oksit (CaO) temel gübre uygulamaları ile birlikte 10 kg toprak içeren saksılara 2 ton da-1 olacak şekilde (80 g-110kg-1saksı-1) biyokömür uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, Domates (TB300) ve Muz (BB500) biyokömür uygulamaları sırasıyla %15.2 ve %10.2 oranında olmak üzere marul bitkisinin boyunu önemli ölçüde artırmıştır. Biyokömür uygulamalarıyla elde edilen en yüksek marul bitki boyu artışı domates biyokömür uygulaması ile en düşük ise biyokömür uygulanmayan toprakta (kontrol) elde edilmiştir. Verim ve kalite parametreleri açısından biochar uygulamaların etkisi birinci döneme göre ikinci dönemde daha belirgin olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmada piroliz sıcaklığındaki bir değişikliğin marul gelişimini etkilemediği ortaya çıkmış ve biyokömür uygulamalarının mahsuller üzerindeki daha fazla etkisi için uzun vadeli bir inkübasyon dönemi önerilmiştir.

Effect of biochar applications on certain quality parameters and lettuce yield (Lactuca sativa L.)

Biochar is increasingly used as an amendment to improve agricultural soil functions and plant growth. However, the effect of biochar application on plant growth can be different due to high variability in the quality of biochar. In this study the effect of different types of biochar application on the growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was assessed in a pot experiment over two period of cultivation in greenhouse. The biochar were produced from four different feedstocks biomass [Vinyard (Vitis vinifera L.), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), Banana (Musa) and Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus. L.)] by slow pyrolysis at 300°C and 500°C temperatures and were used to amend the soil. The experiment was design in randomized complete block with five replications and 9 treatments. The treatments included the Control, VB300, TB300, BB300, CB300, VB500, TB500, BB500 and CB500. The trial consisted of a total of 45 pots (4 agricultural waste × 2 pyrolysis temperature × 5 replications) + 5 controls). Two (2) tons da-1 (80 g-1 10 kg-1 pot-1) of biochar was applied with a basic application of fertilizers NPK (18-18-18) and calcium oxide (CaO). The biochar treatments were found to increase plant height and number of leaves in the second cropping cycle in comparison to no biochar treatments. The application of Tomato (TB300) and Banana (BB500) biochar significantly increased plant height by 15.2% and 10.2% respectively. The greatest increase due to biochar additions was found in the soils with tomato biochar treatment and the least increase was found in the soils without biochar application (Control). The second cropping season appeared to be better in terms of yield and quality parameters than the first season. As a result, in this study revealed that a variation in the temperature of pyrolysis does not impact lettuce growth, and recommends a long-term incubation period for further effect of biochar applications on crops.

___

  • Al Wabel MI, Hussain Q, Usman AR, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS (2018) Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: A review. Land Degradation and Development 29: 2124-2161.
  • Artiola JF, Rasmussen C, Freitas R (2012) Effects of a biochar-amended alkaline soil on the growth of romaine lettuce and bermudagrass. Soil Science 177: 561-570.
  • Asai H, Samson BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research 111: 81-84.
  • Awad YM, Lee SE, Ahmed MBM, Vu NT, Farooq M, Kim IS, Meers E (2017) Biochar, a potential hydroponic growth substrate, enhances the nutritional status and growth of leafy vegetables. Journal of Cleaner Production 156: 581-588.
  • Borchard N, Siemens J, Ladd B, Möller A, Amelung W (2014) Application of biochars to sandy and silty soil failed to increase maize yield under common agricultural practice. Soil and Tillage Research 144: 184-194.
  • Bouyoucos GJ (1955) A Recalibration of the Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of the Soils. Agronomy Journal 4: 434.
  • Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Black American Society of Agronomy 9: 1149-1178.
  • Butnan S, Deenik JL, Toomsan B, Antal MJ, Vityakon P (2015) Biochar characteristics and application rates affecting corn growth and properties of soils contrasting in texture and mineralogy. Geoderma 237: 105-116.
  • Carter S, Shackley S, Sohi S, Suy TB, Haefele S (2013) The impact of biochar application on soil properties and plant growth of pot grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and cabbage (Brassica chinensis). Agronomy 3: 404-418.
  • Cha JSC, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryud C, Jeone JK, Shin MC, Park YK, (2016) Production and Utilization of Biochar: A Review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 40: 1-15.
  • Chan KY, Dorahy C, Tyler S (2007) Determining the agronomic value of composts produced from greenwaste from metropolitan areas of New South Wales Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47: 1377-1382.
  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Research 46: 437-444.
  • Cui YF, Jun MEN G, Wang QX, Zhang WM, Cheng XY, Chen WF (2017) Effects of straw and biochar addition on soil nitrogen, carbon, and super rice yield in cold waterlogged paddy soils of North China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16: 1064-1074.
  • Çağlar KÖ (1949) Toprak bilgisi Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları Sayı: 10, Ankara.
  • Ensarioğlu K (2016) Bıochar’ın Bitki Gelişimine. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Muğla.
  • Eurostat (2012) Fruit and vegetables Yield Annual data http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/dataset?p_product_code=APRO_CPP_FRUVEG. Accessed 02 January, 2012.
  • Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agronomy Journal 102: 623-633.
  • Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical proper-ties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35: 219-230.
  • Hagner M, Kemppainen R, Jauhiainen L, Tiilikkala K, Setälä H (2016) The effects of birch (Betula spp.) biochar and pyrolysis temperature on soil properties and plant growth. Soil and tillage Research 163: 224-234.
  • Haider G, Steffens D, Moser G, Mueller C, Kammann CI (2016) Biochar reduced nitrate leaching and improved soil moisture content without yield improvements in a four-year field study. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 237: 80-94.
  • Hammond J, Shackley S, Prendergast-Miller M, Cook J, Buckingham S, Pappa V (2013) Biochar field Testing in the UK: Outcomes and implications for use. Carbon Management 4: 159-170.
  • Han XZ, Zhu LQ, Yang MF, Yu Q, Bian XM (2012) Effects of different amount of wheat straw returning on rice growth, soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity. Journal of Agro-Environment Science 31: 2192-2199.
  • Jackson ML (1967) Soil chemical analysis prentice. Hall of India Private Limited New Delhi 498.
  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FG, Van Der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 144: 175-187.
  • Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11: 6613-6621.
  • Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J (2010) An Investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Research 48: 501-515.
  • Kacar B (1995) Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri III. Toprak Analizleri Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları No. 3.
  • Kerré B, Willaert B, Cornelis Y, Smolders E, (2017) Long-term presence of charcoal increases maize yield in Belgium due to increased soil water availability. European Journal of Agronomy 91: 10-15.
  • Krull ES, Swanston CW, Skjemstad JO, Mcgowan JA (2006) Importance of Charcoal in Determining The Age and Chemistry of Organic Carbon in Surface Soils. Journal of Geophysical Research 111: G4.
  • Lehmann J, Pereira da Silva JJr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zec W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient vailability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249: 343-357.
  • Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems- A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11: 403-427.
  • Lei O, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on soil physical and hydraulic properties. Journal of Soils and Sediments 13: 1561-1572.
  • Lin XW, Zie ZB, Zheng JY, Liu Q, Bei QC, Zhu JG (2015) Effects of biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration and crop growth in coastal saline soil. European Journal of Soil Science 66: 329-338.
  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal 42: 421-428.
  • Liu Y, Lu H, Yang S, Wang Y (2016) Impacts of biochar addition on rice yield and soil properties in a cold waterlogged paddy for two crop seasons. Field Crops Research 19: 1161-167.
  • Liu Q, Liu B, Zhang Y, Lin Z, Zhu T, Sun R, Wnag X, Ma J, Bei Q, Liu G, Lin X, Xie Z (2017) Can biochar alleviate soil compaction stress on wheat growth and mitigate soil N2O emissions?. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 104: 8-17.
  • Mcbeath AV, Wurster CM, Bird MI (2015) Influence of feedstock properties and pyrolysis conditions on biochar carbon stability as determined by hydrogen pyrolysis. Biomass and Bioenergy 73: 155-173.
  • Mulabagal V, Ngouajio M, Nair A, Zhang Y, Gottumukkala AL, Nair MG (2010) In vitro evaluation of red and green lettuce (Lactuca sativa) for functional food properties. Food Chemistry 118: 300-306.
  • Nelissen V, Ruysschaert G, Manka’Abusi D, D’Hose T, De Beuf K, Al-Barri B, Boeckx P (2015) Impact of a woody biochar on properties of a sandy loam soil and spring barley during a two-year field experiment. European Journal of Agronomy 62: 65-78.
  • Nelson DW, Sommers L (1983) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties 9: 539-579.
  • Nguyen DH, Scheer C, Rowlings DW, Grace PR (2016) Rice husk biochar and crop residue amendment in subtropical cropping soils: Effect on biomass production, nitrogen use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 52: 261-270.
  • Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: 421-422.
  • Pan G, Zhou P, Li Z, Smith P, Li L, Qiu D, Zhang X, Xu X, Shen S, Chen X (2009) Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region China. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 131: 274-280.
  • Pratt PF (1965) Potassium. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties 9: 1022-1030.
  • Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 48:271-284.
  • Rizieq R (2017) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Asosiasi Biochar Indonesia 2016 Prosiding.
  • Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramirez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 43: 699-708.
  • Shang Q, Yang X, Gao C, Wu P, Liu J, Xu Y, Shen Q, Zou J, Guo S (2011) Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice-cropping systems: a 3-year field measurement in long-term fertilizer experiments. Global Change Biology 17: 2196-2210.
  • Singh R, Babu JN, Kumar R, Srivastava P, Singh P, Raghubanshi AS (2015) Multifaceted application of crop residue biochar as a tool for sustainable agriculture: An ecological perspective. Ecological Engineering 77: 324-347.
  • SPSS (2008) Statistics for Windows version 17.0 SPSS Inc Chicago USA.
  • Subedi R, Taupe N, Pelissetti S, Petruzzelli L, Bertora C, Leahy JJ, Grignani C (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions and soil properties following amendment with manure derived biochars: Influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. Journal of Environmental Management 166: 73-83.
  • Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Mäkelä P, Stoddard FL, Alakukku L, Helenius J (2014) Biochar application to a fertile sandy clay loam in boreal conditions: Effects on soil properties and yield formation of wheat, turnip rape and faba bean. Plant and Soil 374: 89-107.
  • Tian X, Li C, Zhang M, Wan Y, Xie Z, Chen B, Li W (2018) Biochar derived from corn straw affected availability and distribution of soil nutrients and cotton yield. PLoS One 13: 0189924.
  • Torun S (2018) Farklı karakteristiğe sahip zeytin pirinası uygulamalarının bazı toprak verimlilik parametreleri üzerine etkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
  • Trupiano D, Cocozza C, Baronti S, Amendola C, Vaccari FP, Lustrato G, Lonardo SD, Fantasma F, Tognetti R, Scippa GS (2017) The effects of biochar and its combination with compost on lettuce Lactuca sativa (L.) growth, soil properties, and soil microbial activity and abundance. doi. 10.1155/2017/3158207.
  • Wang GJ, Xu ZW, Li Y (2016) Effects of biochar and compost on mung bean growth and soil properties in a semi-arid area of Northeast China. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 18: 1056-1060.
  • Xie T, Reddy KR, Wang C, Yargicoglu E, Spokas K (2014) Characteristics and applications of biochar for environmental remediation: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 45: 939-969.
  • Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut and soil chemical properties in south Sumatra Indonesia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 52: 489-495.
  • Zhang AF, Bian RJ, Pan GX, Cui LQ, Hussain Q, Li LQ, Zweng J, Zheng X, Han X, Yu X (2012) Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Research 127: 153-160.
Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1988
  • Yayıncı: Akdeniz Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bitki moleküler üretimli ilaçlar, veteriner aşılarının uygun maliyetli üretimi için umut verici bir sistemdir

Tarlan MAMEDOV, Burcu GULEC, Gulshan MAMMADOVA

Arı sütü 10- Hidroksi-2-Dekanoik asit (10-HDA) miktarı ne olmalıdır?

Merve KESKİN, Asli ÖZKÖK, Fatma KARAHALİL, Sevgi KOLAYLI

Tavuk gübresi ve fertigasyon EC’lerinin örtüaltı baharlık domates (Solanum lycopersicum) yetiştiriciliğinde verim ve kalite üzerine etkileri

Nermin ATA, Mustafa KAPLAN

Fındık üretim alanlarında kullanılan bazı fungisitlerin Trichoderma türlerine karşı etkilerinin belirlenmesi

Elif YILDIRIM, İsmail Oğuz ÖZDEMİR, Muharrem TÜRKKAN, Celal TUNCER, Rahman KUSHİYEV, İsmail ERPER

Yüksek rakımda yetiştirilen bazı sofralık üzüm çeşitlerinin fenolojik ve kalite özellikleri

Halil UZUN, Bircan KILINÇ

Antalya bölgesi sulama şebekelerinin değerlendirilmesi

Sinan KARTAL, Hasan DEĞİRMENCİ

Lizimetre kullanılarak Maraş 18 çeşidi ceviz ağacının su tüketiminin belirlenmesi

Cafer GENÇOĞLAN, Serpil GENÇOĞLAN, Selçuk USTA

RTK GPS alıcısının yön açısı ölçüm doğruluğunun dijital pusula yardımı ile belirlenmesi

İlker ÜNAL

Türkiye su ürünleri yetiştiricilik politikalarının Avrupa Birliği Ortak Balıkçılık Politikası kapsamında SWOT analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi

Simge ATAGÜL ÖZTÜRK, Serpil YILMAZ

Amerika domates genetik kaynakları merkezinden temin edilen domates hatlarının Fusarium etmenlerine karşı dayanıklılık reaksiyonlarının belirlenmesi

Semra CAN, Gülşen ERBERK, Özer ÇALIŞ