ESİN AVCI, HÜLYA AYBEK, Zeliha KANGAL, Nihan ÇEKEN, İzzet Göker KÜÇÜK, Yusuf GEZER

The role of tubes with preservative in urinalysis of pregnant women

In order to increase the efficiency of the preanalytical process at the Public Health Laboratory (PHL) where urinalysis is performed on pregnant women admitted at primary care family health centres (FHC), our aim was to demonstrate the efficacy of preservative urine tubes in this study. The first morning urine samples of 84 pregnant women were collected into urine tubes with or without preservative. The first analysis was used as a reference. The tubes with preservative containing chlorhexidine were transported at room temperature and analysed on the 2, 6, 24, and 72 h. Tubes with or without preservative and transported according to cold-chain principles were analysed on the 2nd and 6th h. Changes in comparison to the reference tube were analysed. When the test results of the tubes with preservative and kept at room temperature were compared to those of the reference tubes, the only changes that were observed were in the leukocyte morphology. During microscopic examination of the tubes with or without preservative and transported in accordance with cold-chain principles, no differences were found except pH changes during strip tests and changes in the crystal structure. The tubes with preservative containing chlorhexidine, whose performance was tested with the aim of controlling pre-analytical variables, may be used in conditions in which transportation in accordance with cold-chain principles is impossible. Tubes without preservative were observed to be adequate in conditions in which transportation in accordance with cold-chain principles is possible within 6 h.

PDF

___

Coppens A, Speeckaert M, Delanghe J. The pre-analytical challenges of routine urinalysis. Acta Clin Belg. 2010;65:182-9.

Delanghe J, Speeckaert M, Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24:89-104.

Lippi G, Becan-McBride K, Behulova D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51:229-41.

Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Urinalysis and collection, transportation,and preservation of urine specimens. Approved Guideline- Third Edition NCCLS document GP16-A3. 2013 November 11t

Ercan M, Akbulut ED, Abuşoğlu S, et al. Stability of urine specimens stored with and without preservatives at room temperature and on ice prior to urinalysis. Clin Biochem. 2015;48:919-22.

Manoni SV, Caleffi A, Alessio MG, et al. Stability of common analytes and urine particles stored at room temperature before automated analysis RIMeL / IJLaM 2008;192-8.

Bottini VP. Mayara H, Martinez M, et al. Urinalysis: Comparisonbetween Microscopic Analysis and a New Automated Microscopy Image- Based Urine Sediment Instrument Clin. Lab. 2014;60:693-7.

Cunningham FG, Lucas MJ, Urinary tract infections complicating pregnancy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;8:353-73.

Schieve A. Laura, Handler A, Hershow R, et al. Urinary Tract Infection during Pregnancy: Its Association with Maternal Morbidity and Perinatal Outcome. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:405-10.

Murray N, Homer CSE, Davis GK, et al. Theclinical utility of routine urinalysis in pregnancy:a prospective study. Med J Aust. 2002;177:477-80.

Kirkham C, Harris S, Grzybowski S. Evidence-based prenatal care: part I.General prenatal care and counseling issues. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71:1307-16.

Eisinger SW, Schwartz M, Dam L, et al. Evaluation of the BD vacutainer plus urine C&S preservative tubes compared with nonpreservative urine samples stored at 4°C and room temperature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:306-13.

Langlois RM, Delanghe JR, Steyaert SR, et al. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick readerfor urinalysis. Clin Chem. 1999;45:118-22.

Kouri T, Malminiemi O, Penders J, et al. Limits of preservation of samples for urine strip tests and particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:703-13.