Habib ÇAKIR, İsmail YÜREKLİ, Köksal DÖNMEZ, Hasan İNER, İhsan PEKER, Ertürk KARAAĞAÇ, ÖZCAN GÜR, Mert KESTELLİ

Risk models for patients undergoing robotic surgery, minimal invasive heart surgery and open-heart surgery

In this study; we tried to compile risk scoring systems (Original EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II and STS) used in robotic surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery and open-heart surgery in the context of the literature.As a result, literature study of risk scoring systems in the robotic surgery was not found. In minimally invasive cardiac surgery, few studies are available. The effectiveness of existing risk scoring systems has not been established in these studies. Therefore, further investigations are required for developing risk scoring systems in robotic surgery and minimally invasive cardiac surgery. In open heart surgery, there is still no “gold standard” scoring system in all populations. Due to the increased case diversity, we believe that the commonly used risk scoring systems must be updated. Widely used risk-scoring systems are not effective in minimally invasive cardiac surgery and this is supporting our idea. Each clinic should choose the appropriate risk scoring system according to their own experience and case diversity.

PDF

___

Nilsson J, Algatsson L, Höglund P, et al. Comparison of 19 preoperative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur heart J. 2006;27:867-74.

Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:816-22.

Siregar S, Groenwold RH, Heer F, et al. Graaf Y, Herwerden LA. Performance of the orijinal Euro SCORE.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:746-54.

Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. Euro SCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:734-44.

Clark RE. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database status report. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:20-6.

Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, et al. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. JAMA. 1992;267:2344-8.

Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, et al. Comparison of Euro SCORE II, orijinal Euro SCORE, and the society of thoracic surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:573-9.

Kuwaki K, Inaba H, Yamamoto T, et al. Performance of the Euro SCORE II and the society of thoracic surgeons score in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;56:455-62.

Zhang GX, Wang C, Wang L, et al. Validation of Euro SCORE II in Chinese patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:606-11.

Wang TK, Choi DH, Ramanathan T, et al. Comparing performance of risk scores for combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting surgery. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:1118-23.

Rabbani MS, Qadir I, Ahmed Y, et al. Heart valve surgery: Euro SCORE vs. Euro SCORE II vs. society of thoracic surgeons score. Heart Int. 2014;9:53-8.

Kar P, Geeta K, Gopinath R, et al. Mortality prediction in Indian cardiac surgery patients: validation of european system for cardiac operative risk evaluation II. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:157-62.

Findik O, Haberal I, Akyildiz M, et al. A comparision of the sensitivity and specificity of the Euro SCORE, Cleveland, and CABDEAL risk stratification systems in the Turkish population. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama. 2012;20:458-66.

Margaryan R, Moscarelli M, Gasbarri T, et al. Euro SCORE Performance in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: discrimination ability and external calibration. Innovations (Phila). 2017;12:282-6.

Kofler M, Stastny L, Reinstadler SJ, et al. Robotic versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: direct comparison of long-term clinical outcome. Innovations (Phila). 2017;12:239-46.

Senay S, Gullu AU, Kocyigit M, et al. Robotic mitral valve replacement for severe rheumatic mitral disease: perioperative technique, outcomes, and early results. Innovations (Phila) 2014;9:292-6.