Efficacy of unenhanced computed tomography features in distinguishing distal ureteric stones from phleboliths
Efficacy of unenhanced computed tomography features in distinguishing distal ureteric stones from phleboliths
The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of unenhanced computed tomography features in the differentiation of distal ureteric stones (DUS) from phleboliths. This retrospective study included 284 DUS and 116 phleboliths in 298 patients whose diagnosis were confirmed by ureteroscopy. The unenhanced computed tomography features of DUS and phlebolith were recorded, including volume, soft tissue rim, comet-tail sign, central lucency, shape, surface, density of pelvic calcifications and bladder volume. The differences between DUS and phlebolith in terms of mean volume and mean density were statistically significant (p
___
- 1. Sommer FG, Jeffrey Jr RB, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:509-13.
- 2. Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC.. Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center?. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:13-7.
- 3. Green M, Thomas M L. The prevalence of pelvic phleboliths in relation to age, sex and urinary tract infections. Clin Radiol. 1972;23:492-4.
- 4. Sorokin I, Cardona-Grau DK, Rehfuss A, et al. Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement. Urolithiasis. 2016;44:545-50.
- 5. Avanesov M, Togmat J, Solmaz M, et al. Increased urinary bladder volume improves the detectability of urinary stones at the ureterovesical junction in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT). Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6953- 64.
- 6. Tanidir Y, Sahan A, Asutay MK, et al. Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias. Urolithiasis. 2017;45:323-8.
- 7. AKDAMAR K, Onur MR, Andi̇ç Ç, et al. Assessment of criteria in differentiation of ureteral stones from phleboliths with thin-slice unenhanced computed tomography. Fırat TıpDergisi. 2010;15:188-93.
- 8. Heneghan JP, Dalrymple NC, Verga M, et al. Soft-tissue" rim" sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;202:709-11.
- 9. Bell TV, Fenlon HM, Davison BD, et al. Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. Radiology. 1998;207:363-7.
- 10. Arac M, Celik H, Oner AY, et al. Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi: thin-slice CT findings. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:65-70.
- 11. Boridy IC, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, et al. Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1999;211:619-21.