Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, mini percutaneous and super mini percutaneous in the treatment of <2cm renal lower pole stones
___
1. Kittanamongkolchai W, Vaughan LE, Enders FT, et al. The changing incidence and presentation of urinary stones over 3 decades. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:291–9.2. Cabrera JD, Manzo BO, Torres JE, et al. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019.
3. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018;122:1034-40.
4. Gucuk A, Yilmaz B, Gucuk S, Uyeturk U. Are stone density and location useful parameters that can determine the endourological surgical technique for kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Urol J. 2018;Aug 26.
5. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:468-74.
6. Liu Y, AlSmadi J, Zhu W, et al. Comparison of super-mini PCNL (SMP) versus Miniperc for stones larger than 2 cm: a propensity score-matching study. World J Urol. 2018;36:955-61.
7. Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2015;7:141–8.
8. Pelit ES, Kati B, Çanakci C, et al. Outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolitotomy in infants: single centre experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:932–8.
9. Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, et al. The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: a step-by-step guide BJU Int. 2017;120:735-8.
10. Karatag T, Buldu I, Inan R, Istanbulluoglu MO. Is micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy technique really efficacicous for the treatment of moderate size renal calculi? Yes. Urol Int. 2015;95:9-14.
11. Karakan T, Kilinc MF, Doluoglu OG, et al. The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis. 2017;45:209-13.
12. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-unsal stone score” . Urology. 2012;80:512-8.
13. Li MM, Yang HM, Liu XM, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat lower pole renal stones 1.5-2.5 cm in diameter World J Clin Cases. 2018;6:931-5.
14. Campobasso D, Grande M, Ferretti S, et al. Subcapsular renal hematoma after retrograde ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: our experience Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018;70:617-23.
15. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018;122:1034-40.
16. Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. 2016;117:655–61.
17. Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, Fan J, Zhao Z, Cai C. The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 2017;120:735–8.
18. Atassi N1, Knoll T. Future of kidney stone management: surgical intervention miniaturization of PCNL: where is the limit? Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Dec 27.
19. Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience Asian J Urol. 2018;5:295-302.
20. Shah H, Khandkar A, Sodha H, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients. BJU Int. 2009;104:840–6.
21. Abdel Wahab O, Sherif H, El-Karamany T. Tubeless PNL in the supine position. Turk J Urol. 2012;38:138–42.
22. Güler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, et al. Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study Urolithiasis. 2019;47:289-95.
23. Bagcioglu M, Demir A, Sulhan H, et al. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneousnephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures Urolithiasis. 2016;44:339–44.
24. Chung KJ, Kim JH, Min GE, et al. Changing Trends in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis in the Real World. J Endourol. 2019;33:248-53.
- ISSN: 2147-0634
- Yayın Aralığı: 4
- Başlangıç: 2012
- Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Kursat GUREL, Allahverdi AGHAYEV, Hande IPEK, Ozen Tugba SİMSEK, Muhammed Aziz ULUSOY, Erhan ESER
Mid-term outcome of wide resection in musculoskeletal fibrosarcoma patients
Resit SEVİMLİ, Adem EMELİ, Semih ERİTEN
Factors influencing influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates of COPD patients in Bolu, Turkey
Manolya BALLAR, Tuncer TUG, Mehmet Kayhan MUTLU, Suat KONUK
Ertugrul ALTİNBİLEK, Kaan YUSUFOGLU, Abdullah ALGİN, Sahin COLAK
Ovarian torsion as an emergency clinical entity
Evrim GUL, Mustafa UCAREL, Yeliz GUL, Salih Burcin KAVAK
Ischemic stroke in young adults: Gender-based differences
Fatma Ebru ALGUL, Yuksel KAPLAN
Pelin AYTAN, Mahmut YERAL, Mutlu KASAR, Nurhilal BUYUKKURT, Ilknur KOZANOGLU, Hakan OZDOGU, Can BOGA, Cigdem GEREKLİOGLU, Asli KORUR, Suheyl ASMA
Identification of chemoresistance-associated miRNAs in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Recep ERYİLMAZ, Rahmi ASLAN, Kasim ERTAS MD, Mehmet Arif DURAN, Kerem TAKEN