Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, mini percutaneous and super mini percutaneous in the treatment of <2cm renal lower pole stones

Renal lower pole stones are a common disorder in the community. In this study, we aimed to compare Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), Mini PCNL(percutaneous nephrolithotomy) and Super Mini PCNL treatments in the treatment of lower pole stones. Patients who had lower pol renal stones with

___

1. Kittanamongkolchai W, Vaughan LE, Enders FT, et al. The changing incidence and presentation of urinary stones over 3 decades. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93:291–9.

2. Cabrera JD, Manzo BO, Torres JE, et al. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019.

3. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018;122:1034-40.

4. Gucuk A, Yilmaz B, Gucuk S, Uyeturk U. Are stone density and location useful parameters that can determine the endourological surgical technique for kidney stones that are smaller than 2 cm? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Urol J. 2018;Aug 26.

5. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:468-74.

6. Liu Y, AlSmadi J, Zhu W, et al. Comparison of super-mini PCNL (SMP) versus Miniperc for stones larger than 2 cm: a propensity score-matching study. World J Urol. 2018;36:955-61.

7. Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2015;7:141–8.

8. Pelit ES, Kati B, Çanakci C, et al. Outcomes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolitotomy in infants: single centre experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:932–8.

9. Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, et al. The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: a step-by-step guide BJU Int. 2017;120:735-8.

10. Karatag T, Buldu I, Inan R, Istanbulluoglu MO. Is micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy technique really efficacicous for the treatment of moderate size renal calculi? Yes. Urol Int. 2015;95:9-14.

11. Karakan T, Kilinc MF, Doluoglu OG, et al. The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis. 2017;45:209-13.

12. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-unsal stone score” . Urology. 2012;80:512-8.

13. Li MM, Yang HM, Liu XM, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat lower pole renal stones 1.5-2.5 cm in diameter World J Clin Cases. 2018;6:931-5.

14. Campobasso D, Grande M, Ferretti S, et al. Subcapsular renal hematoma after retrograde ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: our experience Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018;70:617-23.

15. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018;122:1034-40.

16. Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. 2016;117:655–61.

17. Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, Fan J, Zhao Z, Cai C. The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 2017;120:735–8.

18. Atassi N1, Knoll T. Future of kidney stone management: surgical intervention miniaturization of PCNL: where is the limit? Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Dec 27.

19. Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience Asian J Urol. 2018;5:295-302.

20. Shah H, Khandkar A, Sodha H, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients. BJU Int. 2009;104:840–6.

21. Abdel Wahab O, Sherif H, El-Karamany T. Tubeless PNL in the supine position. Turk J Urol. 2012;38:138–42.

22. Güler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, et al. Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study Urolithiasis. 2019;47:289-95.

23. Bagcioglu M, Demir A, Sulhan H, et al. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneousnephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures Urolithiasis. 2016;44:339–44.

24. Chung KJ, Kim JH, Min GE, et al. Changing Trends in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis in the Real World. J Endourol. 2019;33:248-53.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of the relationship between southwest wind parameters and hospital applications related to headache symptoms

Hatice Seyma AKCA, Sumeyra Acar KURTULUS, Deniz TENGEREK, Berra KALKAVAN, Serkan Emre EROGLU

Successful cruciate incision of the minor papilla in a patient with acute pancreatitis due to pancreas divisum: A case report

Takako TASAKİ, Hideki ONO, Kazunari MURAKAMİ

Respiratory muscle strength: Effects on functional capacity, quality of life and fatigue in women with multiple sclerosis

Ayla Fil BALKAN, Yeliz SALCİ

Anesthesia management for emergency cesarean section in a patient with takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Sedat HAKİMOGLU, Onur KOYUNCU, Cagla AKKURT, Sumeyra YESİL, Senem URFALİ

The role of education levels on patients’ treatment in type 2 diabetes

Turkan Pasali KİLİT, Nazif YALCİN, Kevser ONBASİ

Investigation of colorectal cancer distribution in Mardin province

Aydin AYTEKİN

Life advices in patients with tracheostomy: Rational antibiotic use and cerebro-vascular prophylaxis-physiotherapy

Eylem ACARTURK TUNCAY, Ozlem Yazicioglu MOCİN, Sinem GUNGOR, Nezihe Ciftaslan GOKSENOGLU, Feyza KARGİN, Huriye Berk TAKİR, Emine Ebru AKSOY, Gokay GUNGOR, Nalan ADİGUZEL, Zuhal KARAKURT, Ilim IRMAK, Cuneyt SALTURK, Mustafa AY, Veysel Garani SOYLU

Comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine, liver-specific contrast agents used in magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of liver masses

Mehmet AKCİCEK, Serkan UNLU, Mehtap ILGAR, Tamer BAYSAL

Evaluation of the applications of traditional and complementary medicine in the perspective of family medicine in a tertiary referral center

Mehmet Kayhan MUTLU, Erdal DİLEKCİ

Factors influencing influenza and pneumococcal immunization rates of COPD patients in Bolu, Turkey

Manolya BALLAR, Tuncer TUG, Mehmet Kayhan MUTLU, Suat KONUK