Comparison of ACR 1990 and ACR 2010 classification criteria in fibromyalgia syndrome

Purpose of this study is to compare the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 and ACR 2010 classification criteria in fibromyalgia syndrome. Fifty-one patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and 50 control patients were included in the study. Patients with FMS were diagnosed by a specialist, and ACR 1990 or ACR 2010 classification criteria were not considered as a necessity. Control group consisted of patients with non-inflammatory pain such as osteoarthritis, periarthritis, regional pain syndrome. Patients were evaluated for ACR 1990 and ACR 2010 criteria, and they were examined for algometry. While ACR 1990 classification criteria had a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.88, accuracy of 0.81, ACR 2010 criteria had a sensitivity of 0.78, a specificity of 0.76, and an accuracy of 0.77. In our study, ACR 2010 classification criteria were found to be more sensitive than ACR 1990 classification criteria, but specificity was lower. Besides, the ACR 2010 classification criteria do not require a tender point examination and may be more advantageous in assessing physical and psychological symptoms. It is considered that the classification criteria of ACR 2010 may be more favorable for clinical diagnosis and monitoring of diagnosed disease.

___

Wilke WS. New developments in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: say goodbye to tender points? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76:345-52.

Şendur Ö. F. Ağrılı Kas Sendromları. In: Oğuz H, Dursun E, Dursun N, editors. Tıbbı Rehabilitasyon. 2nd ed. Istanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2004. p.1221-38.

Çapacı K, Hepgüler S. Fibromiyalji sendromu: etiyopatogenez. Ege Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 1998;4:219-25.

Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Should rheumatologists retain ownership of f ibromyalgia? J Rheumatol. 2009;36:667-70.

Fitzcharles MA. Is fibromyalgia a distinct clinical entity? The approving rheumatologist’s evidence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 1999;13:437-43.

Goldenberg DL. Fibromyalgia syndrome. An emerging but controversial condition. JAMA. 1987;257:2782-7.

Smythe HA, MoldofskyH. Two contributions to understanding of the ‘‘fibrositis’’ syndrome. Bull Rheum Dis. 1977;28:928-31.

Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:160-72.

Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthr Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:60010.

11. Mease P, Arnold LM, Bennett R, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1415-25.

12. Yunus MB. Role of central sensitization in symptoms beyond muscle pain, and the evaluation of a patient with widespread pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:481-97.

13. Yunus MB. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;36:339-56.

14. Yunus MB, İnanıcı F. Fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical features, diagnoses, and biopathophysiologic mechanisms. In: Rachlin ES, Rachlin IS, editors. Myofascial Pain and Fibromyalgia. Trigger Point Management. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby; 2002. p. 3-31.

15. Yunus MB, Kalyan-Raman UP, Masi AT, et al. Electron microscopic studies of muscle biopsy in primary fibromyalgia syndrome; a controlled and blinded study. J Rheumatol. 1989;16:97-101.

16. Simms RW. Fibromyalgia is not a muscle disorder. Am J Sci. 1998;315:346-50.

17. Sprott H, Bradley LA, Oh SI, et al. Immunohistochemical and molecular studies of serotonin, substance P, galanin, pituitary adenylyl cyclaseactivating polypeptide and secretoneurin in fibromyalgic muscle tissue. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:1689-94.

18. Richards SC, Scott DL. Prescribed exercise in people with fibromyalgia: parallel-group randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;325:185-7.

19. Mannerkorpi K, Gard G. Physiotherapy group treatment for patients with f ibromyalgia- an embodied learning process. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:137280.

20. Sim J, Madden S. Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: a metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:57-67.

21. Aaron LA, Burke MM, Buchwald D. Overlapping conditions among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular disorder. Arc Intern Med. 2000;160:221-7.

22. Aaron LA, Buchwald D. A review of the evidence for overlap among unexplained clinical conditions. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:868-81.

23. McBeth J, Mulvey MR. Fibromyalgia: mechanisms and potential impact of the ACR, 2010 classification criteria. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8:108-16.

24. Buskila D, Neumann L. fibromyalgia syndrome and nonarticular tenderness in relatives of patients with FM. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:941-4.

25. Fitzcharles MA, Boulos P. Inaccuracy in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome: analysis of referrals. Rheumatology. 2003;42:263-7.

26. Choy EH, Arnold LM, Clauw DJ, et al. Content and criterion validity of the preliminary core dataset for clinical trials in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:2330-4.

27. Mease PJ, Clauw DJ, Arnold LM, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2270-7.

28. Mease PJ, Clauw DJ, Gendreau RM, et al. The efficacy and safety of milnacipran for treatment of fibromyalgia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:398-409.

29. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Outcome and predictor relationships in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis: evidence concerning the continuum versus discrete disorder hypothesis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:831-6.

30. Bidari A, Hassanzadeh M, Ghavidel Parsa B, et al. Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for f ibromyalgia in an Iranian population. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2999-3007.

31. Usui C, Hatta K, Aratani S, et al. The Japanese version of the 2010 American college of rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and the fibromyalgia symptom scale: reliability and validity. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:40-4.

32. Kim SM, Lee SH, Kim HR. Applying the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis and assessment of fibromyalgia. Korean J Pain. 2012;25:173-82.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Is vitamin D an important factor in hepatosteatosis in childhood obesity?

Elif OZSU, Derya ACAR TEPE

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of antihistaminics and combinations of montelukast with allergic rhinitis

Erkan YİLDİZ, Selcen KOCA YILDIZ, Şahin ULU, Tulay KOCA

Do androgen levels play a role in predicting complications of preeclampsia?

Ali Sami GURBUZ, Nuri DANİSMAN

Assessment of the health workers’ knowledge and belief about rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and spa treatments: A descriptive study

Erdal DİLEKCİ, KAĞAN ÖZKUK, Baris KAKİ

Postpartum subdural hematoma following neuraxial anesthesia: A case report and review of literature

Erdinç SARIDOĞAN

Examination of serum oxidant-antioxidant levels of workers at dyehouses of textile sector in Denizli’s industrial estate

Naci Omer ALAYUNT, Sercan TASGİN

Association between disease activity, asymmetric dimethylarginine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-10 and neopterin with echocardiography and blood pressure monitoring findings in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Tarık DEMİR, Fikret AKYÜREK, Sedat ABUSOGLU, ALİ ÜNLÜ, Kenan DEMİR, Ahmet AVCI, Sema YİLMAZ

Determining nursing students’ evidence-based practice competencies and the effective factors

Hakime ASLAN, Hatice PEKİNCE

Possibility of reinnervation and prevention of distal target organ atrophy following side to side neurorrhaphy to the intact nerve after end to end repair of proximal transected peripheral nerves

Mustafa KARAKAPLAN, Emre ERGEN, İrfan AYAN, Kadir ERTEM, Arslan BORA

Effects of spinal anaesthesia related complication and demographic distribution on patient satisfaction following caesarean section

Ayse VAHAPOGLU, Ülkü Aygen TÜRKMEN, Hande GUNGOR, Omer Faruk KOSEOGLU