Üç Farklı Kinematik Sisteme Karşı OneCurve Sürekli Rotasyon Sisteminin Şekillendirme Özellikleri: ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive ve WaveOne Gold

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı simüle edilmiş kök kanal modelleri kullanılarak OneCurve (0,25/0,06), ProTaper Universal F2 (0,25/0,06), Twisted File Adaptive SM2 (0,25/0,06) ve WaveOne Gold Primer (0,25/0,07) eğelerinin kurvatür değişimi, preparasyon süresi, rezin uzaklaştırma miktarı ve çalışma boyu kaybı özelliklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Toplam 67 plastik model kullanıldı. İlk eğrilik açısını, hazırlıksız reçine bloğunun ağırlığını ve ilk kök kanal uzunluğunu doğrulamak için üç model kullanıldı. Kalan 64 model, 16 örnekten oluşan dört gruba ayrıldı. Hazırlandıktan sonra parametrelerdeki değişiklikler tekrar ölçüldü. İstatistiksel analiz SPSS 22.0ile tek yönlü ANOVA ve post hoc Tukey testleri ve Kruskal-Wallis ile Bonferroni düzeltmesi kullanılarak yapıldı. Ayrıca, Pearson ve Spearmen korelasyon katsayıları kullanıldı. P değeri

Several Shaping Characteristics of OneCurve Continuously Rotating System versus Three Different Kinematic Systems: ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive and WaveOne Gold

Objective: This study aimed to compare the curvature change, preparation time, resin removal amount and working length reduction properties of the OneCurve (0.25/0.06), ProTaper Universal F2 (0.25/0.06), Twisted File Adaptive SM2 (0.25/0.06) and WaveOne Gold Primary (0.25/0.07) using simulated root canal models. Materials and Methods: A total of 67 plastic models were used. Three models were used to verify the initial curvature angle, the weight of the unprepared resin block and the initial root canal length. The remaining 64 models were divided into four groups of 16 samples. After preparation, the changes in parameters were measured again. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 22.0 using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s tests and Kruskal–Wallis with Bonferroni corrections. Pearson and Spearmen correlation coefficients were also used. A p-value

PDF

___

1. Ruddle CJ. Nickel-titanium rotary instruments: current concepts for preparing the root canal system. Aust Endod J 2003; 29: 87- 98.
2. Arens FC, Hoen MM, Steiman HR, Dietz GC Jr. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2003; 29: 664-6.
3. Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod 2016; 42: 1009-17.
4. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559-67.
5. Serafin M, De Biasi M, Franco V, Angerame D. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of two rotary single-file endodontic systems: OneCurve versus OneShape. Odontology 2019; 107: 196-201.
6. Arias A, Singh R, Peters OA. Torque and force induced by ProTaper universal and ProTaper next during shaping of large and small root canals in extracted teeth. J Endod 2014; 40: 973- 6.
7. Özyürek T. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold Nickel-Titanium Instruments. J Endod 2016; 42: 1536-9.
8. Liu Y, Qiu N, Xue M, Wang C, Yu X. Comparison of Shaping Ability of Five Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Simulated Curved Canals. Journal of Dental and Oral Health 2017; 3: 1-5.
9. Tien M, Tjoa H, Zhou M, Abbott PV. Comparative Study of Four Endodontic File Systems to Assess Changes in Working Length during Root Canal Instrumentation and the Effect of Canal Curvature on Working Length Change. J Endod 2020; 46: 110-5.
10. Donnermeyer D, Viedenz A, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Impact of new cross-sectional designs on the shaping ability of rotary NiTi instruments in S-shaped canals. Odontology 2020; 108: 174-9.
11. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5.
12. Hieawy A, Haapasalo M, Zhou H, Wang ZJ, Shen Y. Phase Transformation Behavior and Resistance to Bending and Cyclic Fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal Instruments. J Endod 2015; 41: 1134-8.
13. Micro-Mega. The One Curve Brochure. Available at: https:// micro-mega.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/60301900-A_ Flyer-One-Curve-Portfolio-EN_web.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2021.
14. Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 802-6.
15. Gündoğar M, Özyürek T. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Instruments. J Endod 2017; 43: 1192-6.
16. WaveOne Gold brochure. Available at: https://www.dentsply. com/content/dam/ dentsply/pim/manufacturer/Endodontics/ Obturation/Gutta_Percha_Points/WaveOne_ Gold_Gutta_ Percha_Points/W1G_Brochure_EN.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2021.
17. Caldwell JL. Change in working length following instrumentation of molar canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41: 114-8.
18. Vahid A, Roohi N, Zayeri F. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length. Aust Endod J 2009; 35: 93-7.
19. Khurana P, Nainan MT, Sodhi KK, Padda BK. Change of working length in curved molar root canals after preparation with different rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14: 264-8.
20. Kumar R, Khambete N, Patil S, Hoshing U, Medha A, Shetty R. Working length changes in curved canals after coronal flaring by using rotary files and hand file: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16: 399-403.
21. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 2011; 37: 429-38.
22. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D. Effect of canal length and curvature on working length alteration with WaveOne reciprocating files. J Endod 2011; 37: 1687-90.
23. Davis RD, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments. J Endod 2002; 28: 438-42.
24. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 2014; 40: 1860-4.