Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Kullanılarak Geleneksel ve Kemik Destekli Hızlı Üst Çene Genişletme Yöntemlerinin Kök Rezorpsiyonuna Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, geleneksel hızlı üst çene genişletme (GHÜÇG) ve kemik destekli hızlı üst çene genişletme (KDHÜÇG)yöntemlerinin arka üst diş köklerinin rezorpsiyonuna etkisini değerlendirmek ve iki cihaz kullanılarak elde edilen bulguları karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma ortodonti kliniğinde tedavi gören 40 hasta ile yapılmıştır. Çalışma iki grup halinde tasarlanmıştır. Birincigrup GHÜÇG ile tedavi edilen 20 hastadan (13,4±1,2 yaş), ikinci grup ise KDHÜÇG cihazları ile tedavi edilen 20 hastadan (13,2±1,3 yaş)oluştu. Hastalardan tedavi öncesi (T0) ve 3 aylık tutma (T1) sonrası alınan konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi kayıtları programa aktarıldı.Segmentasyon işleminden sonra dişlerin hacimsel ölçümleri yapıldı ve tedavi öncesi ve sonrası hacimsel değişimler istatistiksel olarakanaliz edildi. Grup içi karşılaştırmada bağımlı örnek t-testi, gruplar arası karşılaştırmada ise bağımsız-örneklem t-testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Her iki grupta da T0-T1 arasında meydana gelen tüm dişlerde rezorpsiyon miktarı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu(p

Evaluation and Comparison of RootResorption Resulting from Traditionaland Bone-borne Rapid MaxillaryExpansion Appliances Using Cone-beamComputed Tomography

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the resorptions of the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth after traditional rapid maxillary expansion (TRME) therapy and boneborne rapid maxillary expansion (BBRME) appliances and to compare the findings obtained using the two appliances.Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 40 patients treated at the orthodontics clinic. These patients were divided into the TRME group (13.4±1.2 years old, n=20) and BBRME group (13.2±1.3 years old, n=20) according to the appliance used. Cone beam computed tomography images taken before the treatment (T0) and after a 3-month retention period (T1) was transferred to an image-processing software. Volumetric measurements of the teeth were made after the segmentation procedure, and volumetric changes before and after treatments were analysed statistically. Paired-sample t-test was used for the intra-group comparison, and independent sample t-test was used for the inter-group comparison.Results: In both groups, the amount of resorption in all teeth that occurred between T0 and T1, was statistically significant (p

PDF

___

1. Timms DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 500-7.
2. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 3-14.
3. Matsumoto M, Yoshii O. [A case report of the rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch by opening the mid palatal suture]. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1968; 27: 166-74.
4. Yildirim M, Akin M. Comparison of root resorption after boneborne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with the use of microtomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155: 182-90.
5. Sindel A, Dereci Ö, Hatipoğlu M, Özalp Ö, Dereci ON, Kocabalkan B, et al. Evaluation of temperature rise following the application of diode and ErCr:Ysgg lasers: an ex vivo study. Eur Oral Res 2018; 52: 131-6.
6. Winsauer H, Vlachojannis J, Winsauer C, Ludwig B, Walter A. A bone-borne appliance for rapid maxillary expansion. J Clin Orthod 2013; 47: 375-81.
7. Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 253-62.
8. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 219-55.
9. Barber AF, Sims MR. Rapid maxillary expansion and external root resorption in man: a scanning electron microscope study. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 630-52.
10. Dindaroğlu F, Doğan S. Evaluation and comparison of root resorption between tooth-borne and tooth-tissue borne rapid maxillary expansion appliances: A CBCT study. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 46-52.
11. Ballanti F, Lione R, Fanucci E, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Cozza P. Immediate and post-retention effects of rapid maxillary expansion investigated by computed tomography in growing patients. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 24-9.
12. Garib DG, Henriques JF, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Fernandes AY. Periodontal effects of rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders: a computed tomography evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 749-58.
13. Mommaerts MY. Transpalatal distraction as a method of maxillary expansion. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37: 268-72.
14. Akin M, Akgul YE, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA. Three-dimensional evaluation of hybrid expander appliances: A pilot study. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 81-6.
15. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 627-37.
16. Heimisdottir K, Bosshardt D, Ruf S. Can the severity of root resorption be accurately judged by means of radiographs? A case report with histology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 106-9.
17. Baysal A, Uysal T, Veli I, Ozer T, Karadede I, Hekimoglu S. Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2013; 43: 83-95.
18. Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 99: 35-43.
19. Timms DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 500-7.
20. Memikoglu TU, Işeri H. Effects of a bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 251-6.
21. Alpern MC, Yurosko JJ. Rapid palatal expansion in adults with and without surgery. Angle Orthod 1987; 57: 245-63.
22. Garib DG, Navarro R, Francischone CE, Oltramari PV. Rapid maxillary expansion using palatal implants. J Clin Orthod 2008; 42: 665-71.
23. Tausche E, Hansen L, Hietschold V, Lagravère MO, Harzer W. Three-dimensional evaluation of surgically assisted implant bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 92-9.
24. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 10-7.
25. Langford SR, Sims MR. Root surface resorption, repair, and periodontal attachment following rapid maxillary expansion in man. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 108-15.
26. Odenrick L, Karlander EL, Pierce A, Kretschmar U. Surface resorption following two forms of rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 264-70.
27. Akın M, Erdur EA, Öztürk O. Asymmetric dental arch treatment with Forsus fatigue appliances: Long-term results. Angle Orthod 2019; 89: 688-96.