Semra ERPEK, Çiğdem DEREBOY, Mustafa ALTINIŞIK

ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ TIP FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARI VE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN UYGULANAN TIP EĞİTİMİNE İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Týp eðitimi, geri bildirim

Faculty And Student Ratings Pertaining to Medical Education at Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine

Aims: The present comparative study addresses the students' ratings as well as faculty' evaluation of curricular activities concerning first three years of medical school at Adnan Menderes University in 2000-2001 academic year. Materials and methods: The faculty members' as well as students' evaluations were obtainedby means of a self-report questionnaire consisting of 106 items each rated on a 5-point Likert's Scale. The raters were 87 faculty members (70 %), 33 first-year students (100 %), 33 second-year students (82 %), and 13 third-year students (68 %). Results: Atotal of 106 educational parameters related to the first three curricular years were questioned, 53 percent of which received positive ratings by both students and faculty members. While the positive ratings condensed around the curricular time reserved for practice hours and also the audio-visual apparatuses used to enrich classroom lectures, the negative ratings were condensed around educational facilities such as student library and computer lab. Conclusions: In general, the faculty members and the students appear to be satisfied with the medical education provided at our institution. To enhance the quality of undergraduate medical education, however, educational environments particularly computer lab and library need to be improved.

Keywords:

Medical education, feedback,

PDF

___

1. Baggott J. Reaction of lecturers to analysis of student ratings of their lecture skills. Acad Med 1987; 62: 491- 496.
2. Morris VD. A positive approach to the utilization of student feedback in medical education. Acad Med 1976; 51: 541-545.
3. Stillman PL, Gillers MA, Heins M, Nicholson G, Sabers DL. Effect of immediate student evaluations on a multi-instructor course. Acad Med 1983; 58: 172- 178.
4. Anderson DC, Harris IB, Allen S, Satran L, Bland CJ, Davis-Feickert JA, Poland GA, MillerWJ. Comparing students' feedback about clinical instruction with their performances. Acad Med 1991; 66: 29-34.
5. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Have you had feedback today? Acad Med 2000; 75: 1041.
6. Stern DT, Williams BC, Gill A, Gruppen LD,Woolliscroft JO, Grum CM. Is there a relationship between attending physicians' and residents' teaching skills and students' examination scores? Acad Med 2000; 75:1144-1146.
7. Gill DH, Heins M, Jones PB. Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback. Acad Med 1984; 59: 856-864.
8. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In: Using multivariate statistics, 3 ed. New York: Harper Collings College Publishers, 1996: 402-407