Deparliamentarization in Turkey: A Major Decline in the Scrutiny Function
In parliamentary democracies, governments are formed through parliamentary elections, and both thecabinet and budget must receive the confidence of the legislature. The “golden age”, when parliamentsmake laws without any pressure from the executives and have strong control over cabinets, ended by20th century. For the last few decades, however, legislative studies have been pointing to a shift in thebalance of power from the legislative to the executive branch in many countries. The declining powerof parliaments is explained by many factors. Scholars who studied “declining parliaments” generallyagree on the commonly accepted contributing factors for deparliamentarization. These factors are“constitutional arrangements, increasing global regulations, the complexity of issues and technicalfocusin policy making, disciplinary party structures, the lack of intra-party democracy, the dominationof parties by their leaders, and electoral systems.” Although a trend of deparliamentarization has beennoted, mainly in parliamentary democracies, the decline of parliaments has not been as glaring andforbidding everywhere. Thus, the variation, especially among similar democratic systems, calls fora closer analysis of country cases. This study examines Turkey, and discusses the changes regardingthe power balance between the executive and legislative branches of government by identifying thepattern of changes in constitutions and country’s electoral system, and party structures which tendto stress party discipline and maintain leaders’ control. The paper analyzes the politics of Turkeybetween 1946 and 2014 especially by focusing on the AKP rule after 2002. The power shift in Turkeyhas been from parliamentary supremacy to a very strong executive, and deparliamentarization hasbeen particularly rapid and profound since the 1980s,. In 2017, a change in the constitution allowed atransition to a presidential system and the new system is legalized by the constitutional amendments.The paper concludes with the analysis that there is a significant decline in the power of the parliamentin Turkey, after 1980s, mainly in its scrutiny function. The longitudinal study of changes shows thatdeparliamentarization, or the increase in the power of the executive, was caused by multiple domesticand international factors that occurred simultaneously and reinforced each other’s impact. Thesignificant difference of Turkey from the other world cases are rapid constitutional changes, increasingleader authority within the parties, and existence of dominant party system in Turkey since 15 years.
___
- Adams, J. C. (1970) The Quest for Democratic Law, The Role of Parliament in the Legislative
Process, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Aslan – Akman, C. (2012) “The 2011 Parliamentary Elections in Turkey and Challenges
Ahead for Democratic Reform Under a Dominant Party System,” Mediterranean
Politics, 7 (1): 77-95.
Auel, K. (2007) “Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the Impact
of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU Affairs,” European Law Journal, 13, (4): 487-504.
Ayan – Musil, P. (2015) “Emergence of a Dominant Party System after Multipartyism:
Theoretical Implications from the Case of AKP in Turkey,” South European Society and Politics, (1): 71-92.
Baldwin, N. D. J. (2004) “Introduction,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 10 (2-3): 1-3.
Baldwin, N. D. J. (ed.) (2006) “Concluding Observations: Legislative Weakness, Scrutinising
Strength,” in Executive Leadership and Legislative Assemblies, 295-302, London
and New York: Routledge
Beer, S.H. (1973) “The Functions of Parliament,” in Beer, S.H; Ulam, A.B. (eds.), .Patterns of
Government, The Major Political Systems of Europe: 206-222. Third Edition, New
York: Random House.
Beetham, D. and Boyle, K. (2005) Demokrasinin Temeller, 80 Soru 80 Cevap, Aslıhan Zeynep
Kopuzoğlu (çev.), Ankara: Adres Yayınları.
Blondel, J. (1973) Comparative Legislatures, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall, Inc.
Blondel, J. and Cotta, M. (eds.) (1996) “Conclusion,” in J. Blondel and M. Cotta (eds.), Party
and Government: 49-262, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M. and Katz, R. S. (1999) “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and
Parliaments,” in S. Bowler, D. Farrell, and R. Katz, (eds.), Party Discipline and
Parliamentary Government: 3-22, Columbus: Ohio State University Press
Bryce, J. (1990) “The Decline of Legislatures” (1921), reprinted in Philip Norton (ed.),
Legislatures: 47-56, New York: Oxford University Press
Christensen, T., Laegreid, P. and Roness, P.G. (2002) “Increasing Parliamentary Control of
the Executive? New Instruments and Emerging Effects,” Journal of Legislative
Studies, (1): 37-62.
Crick. B. (1990) “The Reform of Parliament,” (1964), reprinted in Philip Norton (ed.),
Legislatures: 275-285, New York: Oxford University Press
Crimmins, J. and Nesbitt-Larking, P. (1996) “Canadian Prime Ministers in the House of
Commons: Patters of Intervention’. Journal of Legislative Studies, (2): 145-171.
Çarkoğlu, A., Erdem, T., Kabasakal, M. and Gençkaya, Ö. F. (2000) Siyasi Partilerde
Reform, TESEV Yayınları No.13, İstanbul: Acar Matbaacılık
Çarkoğlu, A. (2011) “Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?”
Insight Turkey, 13 (3): 43-62.
Dahl, R. A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University
Press
Diamond, L., Linz, J. J. and Lipset, S. M. (1995) Politics in Developing Countries,
Comparing Experiences with Democracy, Boulder-London: Lynne Rienner
Publishers
Diamond, L. (1999) Developing Democracy, Towards Consolidation, Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Dunleavy, P., Jones, G.W., and O’Leary, B. (1990) “Prime Ministers and the Commons:
Patterns of Behavior, 1868 to 1987,” Public Administration, (1): 123-140.
Duverger, M. (1964) Political Parties, London: Methuen
Elgie, R. and Stapleton, J. (2006) “Testing the Decline of Parliament Thesis: Ireland, 1923-
2002,” Political Studies, (54): 465-485.
Farrell, D.M. (1997) Comparing Electoral Systems, London: Prentice Hall / Harvester
Wheatsheaf
Gallager, M. (2014) “Electoral Institutions and Representation,” in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard
G. Niemi and Pippa Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies 4, Elections and Voting
in a Changing World:11-31, London: Sage.
Gözübüyük, Ş. (1997) Anayasa Hukuku ve Anayasa Metni, Sixth Edition, Ankara: Turhan
Kitabevi
Gumuscu, S. (2013) “The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey,” Government and
Opposition, 48, (2): 223-244.
Hale, W. (2008) “The Electoral System and the 2007 Elections: Effects and Debates,” Turkish
Studies, 9 (2): 233 – 246.
Haynes, J. (2005) Comparative Politics in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haynes, J. (2010) “Politics, identity and religious nationalism in Turkey, from Atatürk to the
AKP”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64 (3): 312-327.
Herzog, M. (2010) “Analyzing Turkey’s 2010 Constitutional Referendum”
(http://fpc.org.uk/fsblob/1269.pdf) (accessed Nov. 8, 2017)
Hirst, P. (1990) The Representative Democracy and Its Limits, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hooghe, M. (2014) “Citizenship and Patricipation,” in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and
Pippa Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies 4, Elections and Voting in a
Changing World: 58-75, London: Sage.
Kabasakal, M. (2014) “Factors influencing intra-party democracy and membership rights: The
Case of Turkey,” Party Politics, (5): 700-711.
Kabasakal, M. (2016) “Küreselleşmenin ve Teknik Gelişmelerin Etkisiyle Yasa Yapımında
Milletvekillerine Sağlanan Desteklerin Önemi,” Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve
Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (2): 60-77.
Kabasakal, M. (2018) “Measuring the Decline of Parliaments: New Indicators and Turkey as
an Illustrative Case,” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73, (1): 269-289.
Kaboğlu, İ.Ö. (2007) Anayasa Yargısı, Avrupa Modeli ve Türkiye, Fourth Edition, Ankara:
İmge Kitabevi
Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1988) “The 1983 Parliament in Turkey: Changes and Continuities,” in Metin
Heper and Ahmet Evin (eds.), State Democracy and the Military Turkey in the
1980s, New York: Walter de Gruyter
Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1990) “Cyclical Breakdown, Redesign and Nascent Institutionalization: The
Turkish Grand National Assembly,” in Ulrike Liebert and Maurizio Cotta (eds.),
Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: 184-222, London:
Pinter Publishers
Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2002) “Elections and Governance’, in Sabri Sayarı and Yılmaz Esmer (eds.),
Politics, Parties and Elections in Turkey: 55-71. London: Lynne Rienner
Publishers
Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2018) “Two elections and a political regime in crisis: Turkish politics at the
crossroad,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18 (1): 21-51.
Karpat, K. (1959) Turkey’s Politics, The Transition to a Multi-Party System, Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (2002) “The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office:
Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies,” in Richard Gunter, Jose
Ramon-Montero, and Juan J. Linz (eds.), Political Parties, Old Concepts and New
Challenges, NY: Oxford University Press
Keyman, E. F. and Öniş, Z. (2007) The Turkish Politics in a Changing World, Global
dynamics and Domestic Transformations, Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press
Kılınç, R. (2014) “Critical Junctures, Catalysts, and Democratic Consolidation in Turkey,”
Political Science Quarterly, 129 (2): 293-318.
Kili, S.(1971). Turkish Constitutional Developments and Assembly Debates on the
Constitutions of 1924 and 1961, Istanbul: Robert Collage Research Center
Kocaoğlu, E. (2002) .Acemi Milletvekilinin Ankara Anıları, İyi adam Yayınları
Lancaster, C. (2014) “The iron law of Erdoğan: the decay from intra-party democracy to
personalistic rule,” Third World Quarterly, 35 (9): 1672-1690.
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K..A. (1994) “Cabinet ministers and government formation in
parliamentary democracies” in Michael Laver and Kenneth A. Shepsle (eds.),
Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government: 3-12, Chambridge: Chambridge
University Press
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1999) “How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval
Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments,” in S.
Bowler, D. Farrell, and R. Katz (eds.), Party Discipline and Parliamentary
Government: 23-48. Columbus: Ohio State University Press
LeDuc, L.,Niemi, R. G. and Norris P. (2014) “Introduction: Democracy and Autocracy,” in
Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris (eds.), Comparing
Democracies 4, Elections and Voting in a Changing World:1-10, London: Sage.
Liebert, U. (1990) “Parliament as a central site in democratic consolidation: a preliminary
exploration,” in.Ulrike Liebert and Maurizio Cotta (eds.), Parliament and
Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: 3-30, London: Pinter Publishers
Liebert, U. and Cotta, M. (1990) Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern
Europe, London: Pinter Publishers
Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six
Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press
Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation
Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore and
London: Johns Hopkins University Press
Loewenberg, G. (1971) “The Role of Parliaments in Modern Political Systems,” in Gerhard
Loewenberg (ed.) Modern Parliaments: Change or Decline: 1-20, Chicago: Aldine,
Atherton Inc.
Loewenberg, G,and Patterson, S. C. (1988). Comparing Legislatures, New York: University
Press of America Inc.
Martin, L. W. (2004) “The Government Agenda in Parliamentary Democracies,” American
Journal of Political Science, 48 (3): 445-461.
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Legislative Research Series, Paper # 2,
Committees in Legislatures, Washington: NDI, 1996: 1-23.
Norton, P. (1998) “Introduction: The Institution of Parliaments”, in P. Norton (ed.),
Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe: 1-15, London: Frank Cass
Offe, C. (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State, Edited by John Keane, Cambridge,
Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Offe, C. (1996) Modernity & The State, East, West, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Olson, D. M. and Norton, P. (1996) “Legislatures in Democratic Transition,” in David M.
Olson and Philip Norton (eds.), The New Parliaments of Central and East Europe:
1-15, London: Frank Cass
Öniş, Z. (2013). “Sharing Power: Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the
AKP Hegemony,” Insight Turkey, 15 (2) 103-122.
Öniş, Z. (2015) “Monopolizing the Centre: The AKP and the Uncertain Path of Turkish
Democracy,” The International Spectator, 50, June 2015, (2): 22-41.
Özbudun, E. (1970) Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Casual Analysis, Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage
Özbudun, E. and Gençkaya, Ö. F. (2009) Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-
Making in Turkey, Budapest: Central European University Press
Özbudun, E. (2012) “Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution,” Insight Turkey, 4 (1): 39-50.
Özbudun, E. (2014) “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift,” South European
Society and Politics, (2): 155-167.
Pennock, J. R. and Smith, D.G. ( 1969) Political Science, Fifth Printing, New York: The
Macmiilan Company.
Powell, G. B. Jr. (1982) Contemporary Democracies, Participation, Stability and Violence,
Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Pridham, G. (1990) “Political Parties, parliaments and democratic consolidation in southern
Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives,” in Ulrike Liebert & Maurizio Cotta
(eds.), Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: 225-248,
London: Pinter Publishers
Puhle, H-J. (2002) “Still the age of Catch-allism? Volksparteinen and Partteienstaat in Crisis
and Re-Equilibration,” in Richard Gunter, Jose Ramon Montero and Juan J. Linz
(eds.), Political Parties, Old Concepts and New Challenges, New York: Oxford
University Press
Raunio, T. R. and Wiberg, M. (2008) “The Eduskunta and the Parliamentarisation of Finnish
Politics: Formally Stronger, Politically Still Weak?” West European Politics, (3):
581 – 599.
Sayarı, S. (2002) “Introduction,” in Metin Heper and Sabri Sayarı (eds.), Political Leaders
and Democracy in Turkey: 1-7, Lanham: Lexington Books .
Schmitt, C. (1988) The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, translated by Ellen Kennedy to English, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Schmitt, C. (2006) Parlamenter Demokrasinin Krizi, A. Emre Zeybekoğlu (çev.), Ankara: Dost
Kitapevi.
Schillemans, T. (2008) “Accountability in the Shadow of Hieararcy: The Horizontal
Accountability of Agencies,” Public Organization Review, June 2008, (8): 175-194
Schmitter, P.C. and Karl, T.L. (1991) “What Democracy Is… and Is Not,” Journal of
Democracy 2 (3), 75-88.
Shaw, Malcolm (1990) “Committee in Legislatures” (1979), reprinted in Philip Norton (ed.),
Legislatures: 237 – 270, New York: Oxford University Press
Shaw, M. (1998) “Parliamentary Committees: A Global Perspective,” The Journal of
Legislative Studies, 4 (1): 225 – 251.
Soysal, M. (1979) Anayasanın Anlamı, Fifth Edition, İstanbul: Gerçek Yayınevi.
Strom, K. (1998) “Parliamentary Committees in European Democracies,” The Journal of
Legislative Studies, 4 (1): 21-59.
Sunar, İ. (2010) Demokrasi: Türkiye Serüveni, İstanbul: Doruk Yayımcılık.
Thomas, G. P. (2004) ‘United Kingdom: The Prime Minister and Parliament,’ Journal of
Legislative Studies, (2-3): 4-37.
Tuncer, E. (2003) Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Seçimler 1877-2002, Second Edition, TESAV
Yayınları No.24, Ankara: Yücel Ofset Ltd. Şti.
Turan, İ. (1997) “The Turkish Legislature: From Symbolic to Substantive Representation,” in
Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds.), Parliament in the Modern
World, Changing Institutions: 105-128, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan
Press
Turan, İ. (2000) TBMM’nin Etkinliği, TESEV Yayınları 14, İstanbul: Acar Matbaacılık.
Uluşahin, N. (2016) “Kuvvetler Ayrılığı ve Yasama – Yürütme İlişkileri,” in Mehmet
Kabasakal (ed.), Türkiye’de Siyasal Yaşam: Dün, Bugün, Yarın: 39-66, İstanbul:
İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları