Humerus başının yukarı kayması: Rotator kılıf cerrrahisinde prognostik bir araç olarak kullanılabilir mi?

Amaç:Rotator kılıf yırtığı bulunan hastalarda sağlam ve yırtık kılıf bulunan omuzda humerus başının glenoide göre superior’a kaymasının tamir sonrası prognostik kriter olarak kullanılabilirliği araştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntem:Tek taraflı tam kat rotator kılıf yırtığı tanısı konulan 27 hasta(14K,13E) çalışmaya dahil edildi.Ortalama yaş 56 (Aralık: 32-71) idi.Ameliyat öncesi her iki omuz glenohumeral eklemin AP grafileri çekildi.Humerus başının yukarı kayma miktarı(∆e) ölçüldü. Kayma miktarı 0-3 mm olan hastalar Grup A, 4-5 mm olan hastalar Grup B olarak sınıflandı.Açık rotator kılıf tamiri yapıldı.Değerlendirmede Constant skoru kullanıldı. Bulgular:Supraspinatus, infraspinatus ve subskapularis tendon yırtıkları sırasıyla 27 hastada(%100), 11 hastada(%40.7) ve 6 hastada(%22.2) vardı.19 hasta A grubunda, 8 hasta B grubundaydı. İzole supraspinatus yırtığı bulunan hastaların hepsi(n=10) ve supraspinatus, infraspinatus yırtığı bulunan 11 hastanın 9'u A grubundaydı. Supraspinatus, infraspinatus ve subskapularis yırtığı bulunan hastaların hepsi(n=6) B grubundaydı. Ortalama preoperatif Constant skoru Grup A'da 48.6, Grup B'de 21.5 olarak tespit edildi. Aradaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu(p

Superior excursion of the humeral head: Can it be used as a prognostic tool on rotator cuff tear surgery?

Objective:Superior excursion of the humeral head was investigated to determine whether a relationship exits between the degree of humeral head excursion and prognosis after surgical repair. Patients and Methods:Twenty-seven patients with one sided full thickness rotator cuff tears were included in this study.The mean age was 56(range:32-71) Preoperative AP x rays of both shoulders were taken. Superior excursion of the humeral head was measured.(&#8710;e) Group A includes 0-3 mm excursion, Group B 4-5 mm. All patients underwent open cuff surgery. Constant scores were used for evaluation. Results:Supraspinatus,infraspinatus and subscapularis tears were found in 27 patients(%100), 11 patients(%40.7), 6 patients(%22.2) respectively.19 patients were in Group A, 8 patients were in group B.The patients with supraspinatus tears(n=10), 9 of 11 patients with both supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears were in Group A.The patients with supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis tears (n=6) were all in Group B.The mean preoperative Constant Score was 48.6 in Group A, 21.5 in Group B.The mean postoperative Constant Score was 75.3 in Group A, 69 in Group B.There was significant difference between two groups statistically.(p<0.05)The reverse relation was found between pre/postoperative Constant scores and &#8710;e. Conclusion:Superior excursion of the humeral head is important for giving an opinion of postoperative prognosis.

___

  • 1) Bassett RW, Browne AO, Morrey BF, An KN. Glenohumeral Muscle Force and Moment Mechanics in a Position of Shoulder Instability. J. Biomechanics 1990; 23 (5): 405-15.
  • 2) Bechtol CO.Biomechanics of the Shoulder. Clin Orthop 1980; 146: 37-41.
  • 3) Chen SK: Glenohumeral Kinematics in a Muscle Fatigue Model. Asian Shoulder Association 1994; 165-169.
  • 4) Cotton RE, Rideout DF: Tears of the Humeral Rotator Cuff. A Radiological and Pathological Necropsy Survey. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46B: 314-328.
  • 5) Deutsch A, Altchek DW, Schwartz E, Otis JC, Warren RF. Radiologic Measurement of Superior Displacement of the Humeral Head in the Impingement Sydrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5 (3) 186-193.
  • 6) Akpinar S, Özkoç G, Cesur N. Anatomy, biomechanics, and physiopathology of the rotator cuff. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37 Suppl 1:4-12.
  • 7) Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated Rupture of the Tendon of the Subscapularis Muscle: Clinical Features in 16 Cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1991 ; 73B: 389-94.
  • 8) Golding FC. The Shoulder- the Forgotten Joint. British Journal of Radiology 1962; N.S.35 149.
  • 9) Weiner DS, Macnab I. Superior Migration of the Humeral Head. A Radiological Aid in the Diagnosis of the Rotator Cuff. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52B: 524-527.
  • 10) Keating JR, Waterworth P, Shaw-Dunn J, Crossan J. The Relative Strengths of the Rotator Cuff Muscles. A Cadaver Study. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75B: 137-140.
  • 11) Poppen NK, Walker PS. Forces at the Glenohumeral Joint in Abduction. Clin Orthop 1978; 135: 165-170.
  • 12) Ekin A, Özcan C. Massive rotator cuff tears: diagnosis and treatment techniques. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37 Suppl 1:87-92.
  • 13) Bezer M, Kocaoglu B, Erol B, Aydin N, Guven O. Long-term results of open surgical repair of rotator cuff tears. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004;38(2): 110-114.
  • 14) Demirhan M, Atalar AC. Methods for fixation of the rotator cuff. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003; 37 Suppl 1:83-86.
  • 15) Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y: Roentgenographic Findings in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Clin Orthop 1990; 254: 92-96.
  • 16) Poppen NK, Walker PS. Normal and Abnormal Motion of the Shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58A: 195-201.
  • 17) Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C. Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop 1994; 304: 43-53.
  • 18) Warner JJP. Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: The Role of Tendon Transfer. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82A: 878-887.
  • 19) Bölükbaşı S, Güzel VB, Şimşek A, Kanatlı U, Cila E. Modified and classic acromioplasty for impingementof the shoulder. Int Orthop 2002;26(1):10-2.
Marmara Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 1019-1941
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1988
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi