BAĞIMSIZ DENETÇİ RAPORLARINDA YER ALAN KİLİT DENETİM KONULARININ ANALİZİ: BORSA İSTANBUL ÖRNEĞİ

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bağımsız denetçi raporlarında sunulan KDK’nın (KDK alt başlığı, sayısı, öncelik sırası, finansal tablo sunum türü vb.) sektöre ve denetim firmalarına göre frekans analizini yaparak mevcut durumu ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla, Borsa İstanbul (BİST)’te faaliyet gösteren 515 şirketin 2017 hesap dönemine ait bağımsız denetçi raporlarındaki KDK incelenmiştir. En çok sunulan ilk dört sıradaki KDK sırasıyla, hasılat, ticari alacaklar, maddi duran varlıklar ve stoklar olarak tespit edilmiştir. Hasılat konusu, tüm KDK sıralarında yer alan tek konu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. BİST’de en çok şirketin olduğu imalat ve mali kuruluşlar sektörlerinde, KDK sayısı ortalamalarının sırasıyla 2 ve 1 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Konsolide finansal tablolarda ise KDK sayısı 2’den fazladır. Bağımsız denetçi raporlarında bilgi teknolojileri denetimi, cari dönem vergi, faaliyet ve finansal kiralama konularının 1 ve 2. sırada yer verilmemektedir. KDK sayısı denetim firmaları açısından incelendiğinde 4 büyük denetim firmasının diğer denetim firmalarına göre daha az KDK bildirdiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Belirlenen her bir KDK alt başlığına ilişkin sunum sayısının (%) ve KDK alt başlığının sunumunda öncelik sırasının sektöre göre farklılaştığı tespit edilmiştir.

THE ANALYSIS OF KEY AUDIT MATTERS IN INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORTS: THE CASE OF BORSA ISTANBUL

The purpose of the study is to reveal the current situation of KAM presented in independent auditor’s reports (the subheading of KAM, number of KAM, report order of KAM, presentation type of financial statements) according to the sector and audit firms by frequency analysis. For the purpose, the KAM were examined in the independent auditor’s reports of the 2017 reporting period of 515 companies quoted in Borsa Istanbul (BIST). The most common KAM are determined as revenue, trade receivables, tangible assets and inventories respectively. Revenue has emerged as the only issue that takes place in all presentation order of KAM. In the manufacturing and financial institutions sectors where the most companies are quoted in BIST, the average number of KAM has been determined 2 and 1, respectively. In the consolidated financial statements, more than 2 KAM are reported. In the independent auditor’s reports, information technology audit, current tax, operating and financial leasing issues are not included in the 1st and 2nd place. When the number of KAM reported analyzed according to the audit firms it is revealed that, Big 4 audit firms reported less KAM than other audit firms. It has been determined that the number of presentations related to the subheading of each defined KAM (%) and the order of priority in the presentation of the KAM subheading differ according to the sector.

___

  • ACCA.(2017). Embracing Transparency Enhancing Value: A First Year Review of the Enhanced Auditor’s Report in Singapore https://www. accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/Technical/audit/pi-singaporeembracing- transparency-enhancing-%20value.pdf (erişim tarihi:14.09.2018).
  • ACCA. (2018a). Key Audit Matters: Unlocking The Secrets of the Audit, https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/professionalinsights/ Key-audit-matters/pi-key-audit-matters.pdf(erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2018).
  • ACCA. (2018b). Enhanced Auditors’ Report A review of first-year implementation experience in Malaysia, https://www.accaglobal.com/content/ dam/ACCA_Global/professional-insights/Enhanced-Auditor-Reporting/pi- EAR-STUDY-malaysia.pdf (erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2018).
  • Asare, S.K. & Wright, A.M. (2012). Investors’, Auditors’ and Lenders’ Understanding of the Message Conveyed by the Standard Audit Report on the Financial Statements, Accounting Horizon, 26 (2), 193-217.
  • Backof, A.,Bowlin, K. &Goodson, B. (2014). The Impact Of Proposed Changes To The Content Of The Audit Report On Jurors’ Assessments Of Auditor Negligence. Yayımlanmamış Çalışma. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=2446057(erişim tarihi :27.02.2018).
  • BDS 701 Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi Standardı,
  • Brasel, K.,Doxey, M., Grenier, J. H. &Reffett, A. (2016). Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes: The Effects Of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgment of Auditor Liability. The Accouting Review, 91 (5), 1345-1362.
  • Brown, T.,Majors, T. &Peecher, M.. (2015). The Influence of Evaluator Evidence, A Judgment Rule, And Critical Audit Matters On Assessments Of Auditor Legal Liability. Yayımlanmamış Çalışma, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
  • Chen. L, Jones, K. L.,Michas, P., Lisic L.L., Pawlewicz P. &Pevzner. M.B. (2013). Comments by The Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the IAASB Proposal: Improving the Auditor’s Report. American Accounting Association, 7(1),11-20.
  • Christensen, B. E.,Glover, S. M. &Wolfe, C. J. (2014). Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in The Audit Report Change Non Professional Investors’ Decision To Invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice&Theory 33 (4),71–93.
  • Church, B.,Davis, S. &McCracken, S. (2008). The Auditors Reporting Model: A Literature Overview and Research Synthesis. Accounting Horizons, 22 (1), 69-90.
  • Czerney, K.,Schmidt, J. &Thompson A. (2014). Does Auditor Explanatory Language in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased Financial Misstatement Risk?,The Accounting Review 89(6), 2115-2149.
  • Çopur Vardar, Gizem. (2018). Bağımsız Denetçi Raporundaki Değişiklikler Kapsamında Kilit Denetim Konularının Sunulması Üzerine Bir Literatür Araştırması, İşletme Bilimi Kapsamında Sektörel Araştırmalar, İş Dünyasına ve akademiye Yönelik Değerlendirmeler (Ed. Nezihe Tüfekçi), Strategic Research Academy, 201-238.
  • Deloitte (2017). Kilit Denetim Konuları http://www.denetimnet.net/ UserFiles/Kilit_denetim_konular_.pdf (erişim tarihi:10.02.2018).
  • Djadvarpour, M. &Larsson, J. (2014). The Audit Report - How will TheAuditor’s Application of ISA 701 Affect The Audit Expectation Gap?,(Yayımlanmamış Lisans Tezi) Skövde: Högskolan i Skövde.
  • Dogan, B. &Arefaine, B. (2017). The Implementation of ISA 701- Key Audit Matters: Empirical Evidence on Auditors’ Adjustment in The New Audit Report, (yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi) Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
  • Doğan, A. (2018). Bağımsız Denetimde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Kilit Denetim Konuları, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20 (1), 65-89.
  • Doogar, R.,Rowe, S. P. &Sivadasan P. (2015). Asleep At the Wheel (Again)? Bank Audits During The Lead-Uptothe Financial Crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32 (1),358–391.
  • EY. (2016). Enhanced Auditor’s Reporting: Assurance- Special Edition. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-enhanced-auditorsreporting/$ FILE/EY-enhanced-auditors-reporting.pdf (erişim tarihi: 20.02.2018).
  • Gökgöz, A. (2018). Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi ve Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Gören İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Journal of Acoounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 4 (2), 126-138.
  • Gutierrez E.,Minutti-Meza M., Tatum K. W. &Vulcheva M. (2015). Consequences of Changing the Auditor’s Report: Early Evidence from the U.K., Singapur Management University Seminar Series, 2015.
  • Kachelmeier, S. J.,Schmidt, J. J. &Valentine, K. (2015). The Disclaimer Effect Of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in The Auditor’s Report. Basılmamış Çalışma, The University at Texas at Austin.
  • KAP, https://www.kap.org.tr/tr/(erişim tarihi: 01.09.2018).
  • Kostova, S. (2016). Opportunities for Enhancing Informative Value of Audit Reports, Проблемитеоріїтаметодологіїбухгалтерськогообліку, контролю і аналізу (Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis), 1,113-121.
  • Köhler, A.G.,Ratzinger- Sakel, N.V.S. &Theis, J.C. (2016). The Effect Of Key Audit Matters on the Auditor’s Report’s Communicative Value: Experimental Evidence from Investment Professionals and Non-professional Investors. International Symposium on AuditResearch (ISAR 2016).
  • KPMG. (2015). KPMG. (2015). The New Auditor’s Report: Greater Transparency, More Relevant. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/ cn/pdf/en/2016/12/the-new-auditor-report.pdf (erişim tarihi:20.02.2018).
  • KPMG. (2017). KeyAuditMatters : Auditor’s Report Snapshot, https:// assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/au/pdf/2017/key-audit-matters-auditorreport- 28-march-2017.pdf(erişim Tarihi: 20.09.2018).
  • Lennox C. S.,Schmidth, J. J. &Thompson, A. M.. (2016). Is The Expanded Model Of Audit Reporting Informative To Investors? Evidence from UK, 2016 International Symposium on Audit Research (ISAR 2016).
  • Long, C.,Jones, K. L., LingLei, L., Michas, P., Pawlewicz, R. &Pevzner, M. B. (2013). Comments by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the IAASB Proposal: Improving the Auditor’s Report. Current Issues in Auditing, 7(1), C11-C20.
  • Lundgren L. &Oldenborg M. (2016). The Public Interest Paradox of The Swedish Auditing Profession: A Quantitative Study of Potential Effects Of Swedish Auditing Profession, basılmamış tez, UMEÅ Unıversitet, Umea School of Business and Economics.
  • Maroun, W. &Atkins, J. (2014). Section 45 of Auditing Profession Act: Blowing the Whistle for Auditing Qulaity?,The British Accounting Review, 46,248-263.
  • Mazars. (2016). Overview of the New Audıtor’s Audıt Report Under The ISAs,file:///C:/Users/%C4%B0zzet/Downloads/Mazars%20 OVERVIEW%20of%20the%20new%20auditor%20report%20February%20 2016.pdf (erişim tarihi.20.09.2018).
  • Nelson, M. W. (2006). Ameliorating Conflicts of Interest in Auditing: Effects of Recent Reforms on Auditors and their Clients. Academy Of Management Review, 31(1),30-42.
  • Nwaombia, A.,Onuoha L.N. &Theophilus A.A. (2016). The New Auditors’ Reporting Standards and The Audit Expectation Gap, International Journal of Advanced Academic Research Social and Management Sciences, 2 (2),118- 133.
  • PwC. (2015). Delivering the value of the Audit New Insightful Audit reports, https://www.pwc.com/sg/en/publications/assets/delivering-the-valueof- the-audit.pdf (erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2018).
  • Ruhnke K. &Schmidt, M. (2014). The Audit Expectation Gap: Existence, Causes, and the Impact of Changes, Accounting and Business Research, 44 (5),572-601.
  • Sikka P. (2009). Financial Crisis and the Silence of the Auditors, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (6-7),868–873.
  • Sirois, L. P.,Bédard, J. & Bera, P. (2016). The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report: Evidence from an Eye-tracking http:// ssrn.com/abstract=2469905(erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2018).
  • XRB&FMA. (2017). Key AuditMatters a Stock Take of The First Year in New Zealand, https://www.xrb.govt.nz/dmsdocument/2614 (erişim tarihi:15.10.2018).
  • Yanık S. ve Karataş, M. (2017). Denetim Raporlarının Geleceği: Yeni Düzenlemeler ve Ülke Uygulamaları, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Ocak (2017): 1-26.