Uluslararası Ticaret Hukukuna Göre Amiable Compositeur “Dostane Arabuluculu” Olarak Hakemlerin Hareket Etmesi

Uluslararası tahkim, anlaşmazlıkların özellikle de ticari anlaşmazlıkların çözümü için alternatif bir yol olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Ancak, taraflar tahkim sürecini uyuşmazlığın adil bir şekilde çözümü için riskli ve de belirsiz olabileceğini düşünebilir. Tarafların, uyuşmazlığın hakkaniyete uygun olarak çözüldüğüne ilişkin güvenini sağlamak için hakem/hakemlere verilen “dostane arabulucu” yetkisi açık bir şekilde verilmelidir.

ARBITRATORS ACTING AS AN AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR UNDER INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW

International arbitration is considered as an alternative way toresolve the disputes, particularly thecommercial disputes. However, partiesmay seem the arbitration process riskyand ambigious interms of resolving thedispute in equity. In order to reassure theparties that the dispute will be resolvedin equity, the authorisation of “amiablecompositeur” should be clearly given tothe arbitrator/arbitrators.

PDF

___

http://www.tez.yok.gov.tr
http://www.uncitral.org
www.kazanci.com.tr
https://icsid.worldbank.org
http://0-international.westlaw.com
http://www.legislation.gov.uk
http://www.lcia.org
Weinberg, Karyn S., Equity in International Arbitration: How Fair is “Fair”? A Study of Lex Mercatoris and Amiable Compostion, Boston University International Law Journal, 04/1994, Volume 12
Pudret, Jean François,; Sebestian Basso, Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2007, Sweet & Maxwell
Şanlı, Cemal, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Esasa Uygulanacak Hukuk, (İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, Doktora Tezi, 1985, Yayın no: 181, Ankara Sevinç Matbaası, 1986
Trakman, Leon, Ex Aequa et Bono: Demystifying an Ancient Concept, Chicago Journal of International Law, Winter 2008, 8, 2
S. I. Strong, Intervention and Joinder as of Right in International Arbitration: An Infringement of Individual Contract Rights or a Proper Equitable Measure?, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, October 1998
R. Drahozal, Christopher, The making of the award: comments on case law developments under the UNCITRAL Model Law, Int. A.L.R. 2005, 8(5)
Nappert, Sophie, International Arbitration Law Review, Case Comment 2009, Int. A.L.R. 2009
Köseoğlu, Özdemir, Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Uyuşmazlık Çözümünün Uygulanacak Hukuk Bakımından İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 2015
Fouchard, Philippe, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 1999
Mauro Rubino-Sammartano, “Amiable compositeur” (Joint Mandate to Settle) and Ex Bono et Aequo (Discretional Authority to Mitigate Strict Law): Apparent Synonyms Revisited, 9 (1) JIA 5-16 (1992)
Mauro Rubino-Sammartan, International Arbitration: Law and Practice, Kluwer Law International, 2001
Maud Piers, HOW EU LAW AFFECTS ARBITRATION AND THE TREATMENT OF CONSUMER DISPUTES: THE BELGIAN EXAMPLE, Dispute Resolution Journal, November, 2004-January, 2005
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, Globalization of arbitral procedure, anderbilt journal of transnational law, 2003,Vol 36/4
Horacio A. Grigera Naon, Choice-Of-Law Problems in International Commercial Arbitration, Mohr Siebeck, 1992
Hong-lin Yu, Some thoughts on the legal status of a-national principles in China , Int. A.L.R. 1998
Chukwumerije, Okezie, Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration, Greenwood Press, 1994
Akıncı, Ziya, Milletlerarası Tahkim, Ankara 2003
Alan Redfern/Martin Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Second Edition, Sweet Maxwell, London, 1991