THE LEGAL AID IN TURKISH ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW IN THE LIGHT OF THE ECHR CASE-LAW

The ability of individuals to apply to the judicial way is important in terms of guaranteeing their fundamental rights and freedoms. In particular, the existence of this legal guarantee becomes more meaningful in terms of legal relations between the individuals and administration who have the privilege of using public power while performing their duties assigned by positive legal rules. At this point, besides the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, accessing the judicial path also appears as a requirement of the right to a fair trial. So that the right to a fair trial can find application in the legal relations between individuals as well as in public law relations between the administration and individuals. In this sense, it should be stated that the legal aid institution in Turkish administrative procedure law has an important value in terms of the right of access to court within the framework of the right to a fair trial. Nevertheless, the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) should be examined to better understand the legal aid institution and ensure the conceptual integrity within the framework of the right to a fair trial. In this direction, the study will examine how the legal aid institution’s theoretical foundation is determined, and in the light of judicial decisions, how it relates to the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals

İham İçtihatları Işığında Türk İdari Yargılama Hukukunda Adli Yardım

Bireylerin yargısal yola başvurabilmesi, temel hak ve hürriyetlerinin güvence altına alınması noktasında önem arz etmektedir. Özellikle, bu yasal güvencenin varlığı, pozitif hukuk kurallarıyla kendisine verilen görevleri yerine getirirken kamu gücünü kullanma ayrıcalığına sahip olan idare ve bireyler arasındaki hukuki ilişkiler açısından daha anlamlı hale gelmektedir. Bu noktada yargının bağımsızlığı ve tarafsızlığı yanında yargısal yola erişebilmek de adil yargılanma hakkının bir gereği olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Öyle ki adil yargılanma hakkı, bireyler arasındaki hukuki ilişkilerin yanında idare ile bireyler arasındaki kamu hukuku ilişkilerinde de uygulama alanı bulabilmektedir. Bu anlamda Türk idari yargılama hukukunda adli yardım müessesinin adil yargılanma hakkı çerçevesinde mahkemeye erişim hakkı bakımından önemli bir değer taşıdığı ifade edilmelidir. Bununla birlikte adil yargılanma hakkı çerçevesinde adli yardım müessesesinin daha iyi kavranabilmesi ve kavramsal bütünlüğün sağlanabilmesi adına, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesinin vermiş olduğu kararların da irdelenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada, adli yardım müessesinin teorik temelinin ne olduğu belirtilerek, yargı kararları ışığında, bireylerin temel hak ve hürriyetleriyle bağıntısının ne şekilde kurulduğu irdelenecektir

___

Akıncı, Müslüm, İdari Yargıda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 2008.

Akyılmaz, Bahtiyar/Sezginer, Murat et al., Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku, Savaş Yayınevi, Ankara, 2018.

Atalay, O., Pekcanıtez Usûl Medenî Usûl Hukuku, 15. Edition, Istanbul, 2017, (pp.2383-2433).

Bedos, Jean Luc, “Acil Haklar: Fransa’da Yurttaşların Hukuki Bilgilere Erişimi” (transl. by Kaya, Cemil), Union of Turkish Bar Associations Review (TBBD), No.83, 2009, (ss.394-401).

Beitz, Charles R., The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, New York, 2009.

Burbano-Herrera, Clara/Viljoen, Frans, “Interim Measures Before the Inter-American and African Human Rights Commissions: Strengths and Weaknesses”, Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Ed. Haeck, Yves/Brems, Eva), Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, (pp.157-177).

Capelletti, Mauro, “Legal Aid in Europe: A Turmoil”, American Bar Association Journal, Vol.60, No.2, 1974, (pp.206-208).

Chhabra, Kirpal Singh, “Legal Aid in Criminal Proceedings”, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, Vol.22, No.3, 1980, (pp.371-376).

De Moor-van Vugt, Adrienne, “Administrative Sanctions in EU Law”, Review of European Administrative Law, Vol.5, No.1, 2012, (pp.5-42).

Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, Who Believes in Human Rights? Reflections on the European Convention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.

Demirkol, Selami, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesinin İdari Davalarla İlgili Yargılama Ayrıntıları, Beta Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2020.

Doğru, Osman/Nalbant, Atilla, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi Açıklama ve Önemli Kararlar Cilt-I, 2. Edition, Legal Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2013.

Duxbury, Alison, The Participation of States in International Organisations The Role of Human Rights and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.

Endicott, Timothy, Administrative Law, 4. Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.Erdoğan, Mustafa, İnsan Hakları Teorisi ve Hukuku, 3. Edition, Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2019.

Gözübüyük, A. Şeref/Tan, Turgut, İdare Hukuku II İdari Yargılama Hukuku, 7. Edition, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 2014.

Gruodyté, Edita/Kirchner, Stefan, “Legal aid for intervenors in proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights”, International Comparative Jurisprudence, Vol.2, No.1, 2016, (pp.36-44).

Huang-Thio, S. M., “Legal Aid: A Facet of Equality before the Law”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.12, No.4, 1963, (pp.1133- 1164).

İnceoğlu, Sibel, “Adil Yargılanma Hakkı”, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa (Ed. İnceoğlu, Sibel), 3. Edition, Beta Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2013, (pp.209-286).

İnceoğlu, Sibel, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, 4. Edition, Beta Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2013.

Kaplan, Gürsel, İdari Yargılama Hukukuna Giriş, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa, 2018.

Karan, Ulaş, Uluslararası İnsan Hakları Hukuku ve Anayasa Hukuku Işığında Eşitlik İlkesi ve Ayrımcılık Yasağı, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2017.

Keller, Helen/Ulfstein, Geir, “Introduction”, UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies Law and Legitimacy (Ed. Keller, Helen/Ulfstein, Geir), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, (pp.1-15).

Kingsbury, Benedict/Krisch, Nico et al., “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law”, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, Vol.68, No.3-4, 2005, (pp.15-61).

Köksal, Mustafa, Adli Yardım (Müzahereti Adliye) Kurumunun İdari Yargıdaki Uygulaması, Terazi Law Journal (Terazi Hukuk Dergisi), Vol.4, No.40, 2009, (pp.97-112).

Latournerie, Roger, Conseil d’Etat’nın Yargılama Yöntemleri Üzerine Bir Deneme (transl. by Yayla, Yıldızhan), İÜSBF Yayınları, İstanbul, 1982.

Lautenbach, Geranne, The Concept of the Rule of Law and The European Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.

Lavrysen, Laurens, “Protection by the Law: The Positive Obligation to Develop a Legal Framework to Adequate Protect ECHR Rights”, Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Ed. Haeck, Yves/Brems, Eva), Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, (pp.69-129).

Madsen, Mikael R., “The Protracted Institutionalization of the Strasbourg Court: Legal Diplomacy to Integrationist Jurisprudence”, The European Courof Human Rights between Law and Politics (Ed. Christoffersen, Jonas/Madsen, Mikael R.), Oxford University Press, USA, 2011, (pp.43-60).

Özenç, Berke, Hukuk Devleti Kökenleri ve Küreselleşme Çağındaki İşlevi, İletişim Yayınları, Istanbul, 2014.

Palmer, Ellie, Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Right Act, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007.

Petrescu, Oana-Măriuca, “Ensuring Equal Legal Aid to the Citizens in the European Procedural Law”, Acta Juridica Hungarica, Vol.55, No.1, 2014, (pp.57-70).

Robertson, David, A Dictionary of Human Rights, 2. Edition, Europa Publications, London, 2004.

Rønning, Olaf H., “Legal Aid in Norway”, Outsourcing Legal Aid in the Nordic Welfare States (Ed. Rønning, Olaf H./Hammerslev, Ole), Palgrave Macmillan, Switzerland, 2018, (pp.15-41).

Rousset, Michel, L’idée de puissance publique en droit administratif, Paris, Librairie Dalloz, 1960.

Schwarze, Jurgen, “Judicial Review of European Administrative Procedure”, Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol.68, No.1, 2004, (pp.85-105).

Seerden, René/Stroink, Frits, “Administrative Law in the Netherlands”, Administrative Law of the European Union, its Member States and the United States: A Comparative Analysis (Ed. Seerden, René/Stroink, Frits), Intersentia, Antwerpen, 2002, (pp.145-197).

Sellers, Mortimer, “An Introduction to the Rule of Law in Comparative Perspective”, (Ed. Sellers, Mortimer/Tomaszewski, Tadeusz), Springer, Dordrecht, 2010, (pp.1-10).

Settem, Ola Johan, Applications of the ‘Fair Hearing’ Norm in ECHR Article 6(1) to Civil Proceedings: With Special Emphasis on the Balance Between Procedural Safeguards and Efficiency, Springer, Switzerland, 2016.

Sever, Tina, “Procedural Safeguards Under The European Convention on Human Rights in Public (Administrative) Law Matters”, DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, Vol.9, No.2, 2018, (pp.97-116).

Stavros, Stephanos, “Fair Trial in Emergency Situations”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.41, No.2, 1992, (pp.343-365). Tambakaki, Paulina, Human Rights, or Citizenship?, Birkbeck Law Press, USA, 2010.

Van As, Hennie, “Legal Aid in South Africa: Making Justice Reality”, Journal of African Law, Vol.49, No.1, 2005, (pp.54-72).

Varadi, Agnes, “The Concept of Legal Aid in the Most Recent Case Law of ECJ”, Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 2015, (pp.461-478).

Vaurs-Chaumette, Anne-Laure, “Provisional Release in International Criminal Proceedings: The Limits of the Influence of Human Rights Law”, The Influence of Human Rights on International Law (Ed. Weiß, Norman/ Thouvenin, Jean-Marc), Springer, Switzerland, 2015, (pp.131-144).

Vidaj Gil, Ernesto J., “The Social State Based on the Rule of Law in the Europa of Rights”, Golbalization and Human Rights Challenges and Answers from a European Perspective (Ed. Ballesteros, Jesús/Fernandez Ruiz-Galvez, Encarnacion/Talavera, Pedro), Springer, Dordrecht, 2012, (pp.179-204).

Wright, Jane, Tort Law and Human Rights, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001.

Wade, H. W. R./Forsyth, Christopher F., Administrative Law, 11. Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.Sine Tsaggarakis A.E.E. v. Greece, App No.17257/13, 23.05.2019

Kaba v. Turkey, App. No:1236/05, 01.03.2011

Airey v. Ireland, App. No:6289/73, 09.10.1979

Golder v. United Kingdom, App. No:4451/70, 21.02.1975

Mikhaylova v. Russia, App. No:46998/08, 19.11.2015

Granos Organicos Nacionales S.A. v. Germany, App. No:19508/07, 24.09.2012

Hood v. The United Kingdom, App. No:27267/95, 18.02.1999

İlbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v. Turkey, App. No:19986/06, 10.07.2012

McVicar v. The United Kingdom, App. No:46311/99, 07.08.2002

Gnahore v. France, App. No:40031/98, 19.09.2000

P., C. and S. v. The United Kingdom, App. No:56547/00, 16.10.2002 Siałkowska v. Poland, App. No:8932/05, 22.03.2007

Sürmeli v. Germany, App. No:75529/01, 08.06.2006

Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey, App. No:52658/99, 17.07.2007

TCC. App. of Elif Dandan and İpek Melis Dandan, App. No:2014/9973, 05.04.2018

TCC. App. of Mahmut Can, App. No:2013/3008, 06.02.2014

TCC. App. of Mehmet Şerif Ay, App. No:2012/1181, 17.09.2013

TCC. App. of Rıdvan Uzuntok, App. No:2014/17300, 21.11.2017

TCC. App. of Sabri Çetin, App. No:2103/3007, 06.02.2014TCC. App. of Sadegül Baykuş and Devrimci Sağlık İşçileri Sendikası, App No:2014/2197, 21.09.2017

TCC. App. of Tuncay Gürsen, App. No:2016/35379, 15.01.2020

D2D. E.2018/4013, K.2019/1520, 28.03.2019

D3D. E.2018/4122, K.2019/1668, 08.03.2019

D4D. E.2010/8142, K.2010/5098, 20.10.2010

D6D. E.1987/331, K.1987/377, 16.04.1987

D6D. E.2014/2387, K.2014/4122, 27.05.2014

D8D. E.2009/3631, K.2009/3579, 01.06.2009

D10D. E.2008/2007, K.2010/1843, 09.03.2010

D10D. E.2008/1136, K.2011/4131, 10.10.2011

D10D. E.2008/1136, K.2011/4131, 10.10.2011

D10D. E.2010/3571, K.2013/901, 12.02.2013

D10D. E.2009/3442, K.2013/1174, 15.02.2013

D10D. E.2009/16671, K.2013/2098, 11.03.2013

D15D. E.2011/12209, K.2013/870, 06.02.2013

D15D. E.2012/335, K.2013/1490, 21.02.2013

D15D. E.2013/311, K.2013/1491, 21.02.2013

D15D. E.2013/100, K.2013/1943, 14.03.2013

D15D. E.2015/5251, K.2015/6403, 22.10.2015

D15D. E.2016/2380, K.2016/2544, 12.04.2016

D15D. E.2016/2708, K.2019/312, 05.02.2019

DİDDK. E.2018/722, K.2018/1125, 21.03.2018

- https://www.ohchr.org

- http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/ibb

- https://www.lexpera.com.tr

- https://www.unhcr.org

- https://www.constituteproject.org

- http://www.danistay.gov.tr

- https://kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr

- https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr

- https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr

- https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf