___

• Cicero, Cicero. On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate, Stoic Paradoxes, On the Divisions of Oratory: A. Rhetorical Treatises, Çev. H. Rackham (Loeb Classical Library No. 349).
• Cicero, M. Tulli Ciceronis De Natura Deorum. De Divinatione. De Fato, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1886.
• Cicero, Cicero: On Fate, with Boethius, Consolation V (Classical Texts S), Çev. R.W. Sharples, Aris & Phillips, 1992.
• Cicero, M. Tulli Ciceronis ad Quintum Fratrem Dialogi Tres de Oratore, Libraria Weidmannia, Lipsiae, 1816.
• Cicero, M. T. Ciceronis Pars Tertia sive Opera Philosophica ad Optimos Codices, Ed. M. N. Bouillet (Col. Nicolaus Eligius Lemaire), vol.4, Paris, 1831.
• Akoğlu, S., “Cicero’da Tanrı, İnanç ve Yazgı: Özgür İstenç’te Assensio’nun Yeri” (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi, Latin Dili ve Edebiyatı, Ankara 2006.
• Albrecht, M. Von, A History of Roman Literature: From Livius to Boethius with Special Regard to Its Influence on World Literature, vol.1, Brill, 1997.
• Allott, P., Invisible Power 2. A Metaphysical Adventure Story, Xlibris, 2008.
• Astin, A. E., Scipio Aemilianus, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1967.
• Baraz, Y., A Written Republic. Cicero’s Philosophical Politics, Princeton University Press, 2012.
• Beeson, C. H., “Lupus of Ferrieres and Hadoard”, CPh 43, 1948, s.190-191.
• Bischoff, B., “Hadoardus and the Manuscripts of Classical Authors from Corbie”, In Didaskaliae. Studies in honor of Anselm M. Albareda, Ed. Sesto Prete, New York, 1961.
• Bobzien, S., “Chrysippus’ Theory of Causes”, Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Ed. Katerina Ierodiakonou, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1999.
• Botros, S., “Freedom, Causality, Fatalism and Early Stoic Philosophy”, Phronesis, 30, 1985, s.274-304.
• Cogniot, G., İlkçağ Materyalizmi, Çev. S. Selvi, Sarmal Yayınevi, 2. Baskı, 1992.
• Craig, E. (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge, London and New York, 1998.
• Cropsey, J., Plato’s World: Man’s Place in the Cosmos, The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
• Dihle, A., “Zur Schicksalslehre des Bardesanes”, Antike and Orient, Heidelberg, 1984, s.164-5.
• Dihle, A, The Theory of Will in Classical Antiquity, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1982.
• Dillon, J. M., The Middle Platonists, London, 1977.
• Dobbin, R., “προαίρεσις in Epictetus”, Ancient Philosophy, 11, 1991, s.111-135.
• Donini, P. L., “Crisippo e la nozione del possibile”, RFIC 101, 1973, s.333-351.
• Donini, P. L, “Fato e volunta umana in Crisippo”, Atti dell’Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 109, 1974/5, s.1-44.
• Donini, P. L, “Plutarco e il determinismo di Crisippo”, Aspetti dello stoicismo e dell’epicureismo in Plutarco, Ed. I. Gallo, Ferrara, 1988, s.21-32.
• Duhot, J. J., La Conception Stoicienne De La Causalite, J. Vrin, 1988.
• Dürüşken, Ç., “Stoa Mantığı”, Felsefe Arkivi 28, İstanbul 1991, s. 287-308. Falconer, W. A., “A Review of M. Durand’s La date du De Divination”, CPh 18, 1923, s.310-327.
• Forschner, M., Die stoische Ethik, Stuttgart, 1981.
• Frede, M., “The Original Notion of Cause”, Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Ed. J. Barnes - M. F. Burnyeat - M. Schofield, Oxford University Press, 1980, s.217-249.
• Hintikka, J., Time and Necessity. Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality, Oxford University Press, 2002.
• Inwood, B., Ethics and Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford University Press, 1985.
• Kidd, I. G. (Ed.), Posidonius. III. The Translation of the Fragments, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
• Kneale, W. – Kneale, M., The Development of Logic, Oxford Clarendon Press, 1962.
• Levene, D. S., Religion in Livy, E. J. Brill, 1993.
• Luck, G., Ancient Pathways and Hidden Pursuits: Religion, Morals, and Magic in the Ancient World, The University of Michigan Press, 2003. = “On Cicero, De Fato 5 and Related Passages”, The American Journal of Philology, vol.99, No:2, Summer 1978, s.155-158.
• Marwede, D. P., “A Commentary on Cicero’s ‘De Fato’” (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), The Johns Hopkins University, 1984.
• Mates, B., Stoic Logic, University of California Press, Berkeley ve Los Angeles, 1961.
• Michael, F. S., “(VII.) What is the Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus?”, American Philosophical Quarterly 13, No:3, July 1976, s.229-235.
• Mikel, A. F., “The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus” (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), The Florida State University, 1992.
• Morford, M., The Roman Philosophers. From the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius, Routledge, 2002.
• O’Keefe, T., Epicurus on Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• Öner, N., Klasik Mantık, Ankara Üniversitesi. İlahiyat Fakültesi Yayınları, No:173, Beşinci Baskı 1986.
• Özbayoğlu, E., Lucretius’ta Clinamen Kavramı, Klasik Yayınlar:1, İstanbul 1988.
• Özlem, D., Klasik / Sembolik Mantık. Mantık Felsefesi, İnkılâp Yayınevi, 7. Baskı, İstanbul, 2004.
• Philippson, R., “M. Tullius Cicero; Philosophische Schriften”, RE 13A, 1939, s.1104-1192.
• Pultar, M., Yıldız Adları Sözlüğü, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2007. Ragozin, Z. A., Chaldea. From the Earliest Times to the Rise of Assyria, Wildhern Press, 2008.
• Reiss, Timothy J., Mirages of the Selfe: Patterns of Personhood in Ancient and Early Modern Europe, Stanford University Press, 2003.
• Rescher, N., “A Version of the ‘Master Argument’ of Diodorus”, Journal of Philosophy 63, 1966, s.438-445.
• Robert, P., Philologische Wochenschrift 54, 1934, s.1030-1039.
• Schallenberg, M., Freiheit und Determinismus. Ein philosophischer Kommentar zu Ciceros Schrift De fato (Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 75), De Gruyter, Berlin / New York, 2008.
• Schmidt, P. L., “Die Überlieferung von Ciceros Schrift ‘De Legibus’” Studia et Testimonia Antiqua, 10, Munich 1974.
• Schofield, M., “Cicero for and against Divination”, JRS 76, 1986, s.47-65.
• Schwartzman, S., The Words of Mathematics: An Etymological Dictionary of Mathematical Terms Used in English, The Mathematical Association of America, 1994.
• Sedley, D., “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 231, 1977, s.74-120.
• Seidl, G. – Bonitz, H. – Mozart, J., Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien, (“Literarische Notiz über neue Fragmente von Cicero’s Schrift de fato”), Verlag und Druck von Carl Gerold und Sohn, Wien, 1854.
• Taylan, N., Mantık. Tarihçesi. Problemleri, Marifet Yayınları, 1981.
• Yonarsoy, Y. Kenan, Cicero’nun Felsefi Terminolojisi (Doktora Tezi), İstanbul Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Matbaası, İstanbul 1982. The Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology, vol.I, Deighton, Bell & Co., Cambridge 1854, s.104-105.