Sibel ER NAS, Havva YAMAN, Şeyma TURAN, Zeynep TATLI

Ölçme Değerlendirme Amaçlı Geliştirilecek Bir Web 2.0 Aracına Yönelik İhtiyaç Tespiti

Araştırmanın amacı, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü (BÖTE) ve Temel Eğitim alan uzmanlarının görüşleri doğrultusunda sınıf öğretmenleri için geliştirilecek bir Web 2.0 ölçme ve değerlendirme aracının özelliklerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu araştırmada durum çalışması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar, mesleki deneyimleri 1 ile 27 yıl arasında değişen 10 BÖTE ve 10 Temel Eğitim Bölümü olmak üzere 20 alan uzmanından oluşmaktadır. Alan uzmanlarının görüşleri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla alınmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde sınıf öğretmenlerinin kullanımına yönelik geliştirilecek olan ölçme ve değerlendirme Web 2.0 aracının öğrenciler tarafından tercih edilmesi için kullanımı kolay bir arayüze ve multimedya destekli soru/cevap tasarımına sahip olması, ödül/yarışma ve takım çalışması etkileşimini içermesi gerektiği belirlenmiştir. Öğretmenler tarafından tercih edilmesi için ise kullanım kolaylığı sağlanmalı, MEB ve paydaşlar tarafından desteklenmesi belirtilmiştir. Geliştirilecek olan ölçme ve değerlendirme Web 2.0 aracının sonuca dayalı ve grafik tabanlı raporlama özelliklerini içermesi önerilmiştir. Özellikle Covid-19 pandemi sürecinde velilerin öğrencilere destek olabilmeleri ve öğrencinin gelişimini takip edebilmeleri için veli arayüzüne yer verilmesi ve bu arayüzde sadece kendi çocukları ile sınırlı olarak detaylı istatistiksel gelişim raporunun yer alması önerilmektedir.

Need Analysis of a Web 2.0 Tool to be Developed for Measurement and Evaluation in Education

The aim of this research is to reveal the features of a Web 2.0 tool for measurement and evaluation that will be developed for primary education teachers, in line with the opinions of experts from the Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology (CEIT) and Primary Education (PE). Case study is one of the qualitative research methods used in this research. Participants consisted of 20 (CEIT: 10, PE: 10) field experts, with professional experiences ranging from 1 to 27 years. The opinions of the field experts were received through semistructured interviews. The findings obtained in the research were evaluated in general. It has been determined that the measurement and evaluation Web 2.0 tool to be developed for the use of primary education teachers, should not only have a question/answer design with multimedia support, but also include awards/competition and teamwork’ interaction in order to be preferred by students. Additionally, it should provide ease of use and be supported by stakeholders in order to be preferred by teachers. It is recommended that the specified Web 2.0 tool should include outcome-based and graphical-based reporting features. Especially in the Covid-19 pandemic, in order for parents to support their child and follow the student’s progress, it is recommended that a detailed statistical development report be included in the parent interface limited to their children only.

PDF

___

Acar, S., Peker, B., & Küçükgençay, N. (2020). Opinions of secondary school teachers from various departments about online education platforms. Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 6(27), 901-925. https://doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.347
Adıgüzel, A. (2020). Teachers’ views on distance education and evaluation of student success in the pandemic process. The Journal of National Education, 49(1), 253- 271. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.781998
Akgül, F., Küpeli, E., & Kır, İ. (2015). Identifying the computer literacy skill levels of primary school teachers: The case of Kahramanmaras. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(55), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.44589
Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802368173
Almazon, R. S., Gil-García, J. R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Luna, D. E., & Díaz-Murillo, G. (2011). The use of Web 2.0 on Mexican state websites: A three-year assessment. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 9(2), 107-121.
Altınışık, S., & Orhan, F. (2002). The effects of multimedia learning environment on the students’ attitudes and achievement in social studies. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 41-49.
Amoroso, D. (2005). Use of online assessment tools to enhance student performance in large classes. Information Systems Education Journal, 3(4), 1-10.
Arslan, S., & Şendurur, P. (2017). Investigation of changes in factors affecting the technology integration in education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(3), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.21927
Assessment Reform Group [ARG]. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. University of Cambridge School of Education.
Aytaçlı, B. (2012). A detailed analysis on case study. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Education Sciences, 3(1), 1-9.
Bakar, F., & Avan, Ç. (2019). Use of technology in measurement and evaluation: Electronic portfolios. Social Scientific Centered Issues, 1(2), 37-42.
Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). Science teachers’ views on distance education in the COVID-19 pandemic process. Turkish Studies, 15(4),109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-144.
Bozkurt, A. (2020). The coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic process and evaluations on education in the post-pandemic world: New normal and new education paradigm. AUAd, 6(3), 112-142.
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
Bower, M. (2015). A typology of Web 2.0 learning technologies. Educause, 8(2), 2015.
Brader, A., Luke, A., Klenowski, V., Connolly, S., & Behzadpour, A. (2014). Designing online assessment tools for disengaged youth. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(7), 698-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.817617
Buluş-Kırıkkaya, E., Dağ, F., Durdu, L., & Gerdan, S. (2016). CAI software for 8th grade natural processes unit and its effect on academic success. Elementary Education Online, 15(1) 234-250. : http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.11845
Burke, J., & Dempsey, M. (2020). COVID-19 practice in primary schools in Ireland report. Maynooth University of Education. http://www.into.ie/app/uploads/2020/04 /Covid-19-Practice-in-Primary-Schools-Report-1.pdf
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Publications.
Çakır, H., & Topçu, H. (2005). Internet as a communication language. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 19(2), 71-96.
Can, E. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and its pedagogical reflections: Open and distance education practices in Turkey. AUAd, 6(2), 11-53.
Çelebi, C., & Satırlı, H. (2021). Usage areas of Web 2.0 tools at primary school level. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 75-110. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.938122
Çelik, T. (2021). Examining formative evaluation experiences of prospective social studies teachers using Web 2.0 applications. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(231), 173- 198. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.713075
Cesur, E., & Yelken, T. (2015). Teachers’ opinions about intel teacher programme inservice training with face to face education and distance education. Journal of International Social Research, 8(38), 673-688. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20153813677
Chiheb, R., Faizi, R., & Afia, A. E. (2011). Using objective online testing tools to assess students’ learning: Potentials and limitations. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 24(1), 69-72.
Cho, V., Cheng, T. E., & Lai, W. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology-A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Doğan, S., & Koçak, E. (2020). A study on distance learning activities in the context of the EBA system. Journal of Economics and Social Research, 7(14), 111-124.
Drenoyianni, H., & Selwood, I. D. (1998). Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers’ perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 3(2), 87-99.
Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2017). An examination of the factors that affect teachers’ technology use proficiency. In H. F. Odabaşı, B. Akkoyunlu & A. İşman (Eds.), Educational technology readings 2017 (pp. 537-556). TOJET-The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.
Eken, Ö., Tosun, N., & Tuzcu-Eken, D. (2020). Urgent and Compulsory Move to Distance Education upon COVID-19: A General Evaluation. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.780722
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 182-188.
Ertmer, P. A., Paul, A., Molly, L., Eva, R., & Denise, W. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1999.10782269
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195-219.
Guha, S. (2003). Are we all technically prepared? —Teachers’ perspective on the causes of comfort or discomfort in using computers at elementary grade teaching. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1), 317-349.
Günther, J. (2007). Digital natives and digital immigrants. Studienverlag.
Handal, B. (2004). Teachers’ instructional beliefs about integrating educational technology. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 17(1), 1-10.
Hart, J. (2008). Understanding today’s learner. Learning Solutions Magazine, 22,1-11.
Harvey, T. (2019). Using ipads and seesaw for formative assessment in k2 classrooms. [Conference presentation]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) 2019, Philadelphia, United States. https://conference.iste.org/2019/program/ search/detail_session.php?id=112113249
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(3), 1-15.
İnal, E., & Arslanbaş, F. (2021). In teaching Turkish as a foreign language communication focused Web 2.0 tools and application examples. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 16(Special Number), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.850781
Kapuler, D. (2014). Top 100 sites and apps of 2014. Tech &Learning, 35(6),14-16.
Karadağ, A. (2020, May 5). MEB kurumları yönetmeliğinde değişiklik resmî gazete'de. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/egitim/meb-kurumlari-yonetmeligindedegisiklik-resmi- gazetede/1833220
Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., & Binay-Eyüboğlu, F. A. (2018). Investigation of the relationships between lifelong learning attitudes, digital native status and technology acceptance of teachers in terms of each other and various variables. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 4(1), 1-17.
Kayacan, K., & Ulker, F. T. (2020). Technology for Education. In M. Zayyad & A. A. Unsal (Eds.), Education research highlights in mathematics, science and technology 2020 (pp. 33-46). ISRES Publishing
Keskin, M., & Kaya, D. Ö. (2020). Evaluation of students’ feedbacks on web-based distance education in the COVID-19 process. İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Health Science Journal, 5(2), 59-67.
Konan, N. (2010). Computer literacy levels of teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2567-2571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.374
Lake, R., & Olson, L. (2020). Learning as we go: Principles for effective assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33, 363-374.
Martínez-Villaseñor, M. D. L., González-Mendoza, M., & Danvila Del Valle, I. (2014). Enrichment of learner profile with ubiquitous user model interoperability. Computación Sistemas, 18(2), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-18-2-2014- 037
Ministy of National Education [MoNE]. (2020). Sınıf eğitimi öğretmen rehber kitapçığı. https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_08/26145857_Sinif.pdf
Orhan-Göksün, D., Filiz, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2018). Education bag: Development of a social website which presents Web 2.0 tools in a categorical way. Ege Education Journal, 19(2), 505-533. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.437670
Özer, M. (2020). Educational policy actions by the ministry of national education in the times of covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1124- 1129. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.722280
Özpınar, İ. (2020). Preservice teachers’ use of Web 2.0 tools and perspectives on their use in real classroom environments. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(3), 814-841. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.736600
Pamuk, S., Ülken, A., & Dilek, N. (2012). The investigation of preservice teachers’ technology integration competencies from technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 9(17), 415-438.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin A Sage Company.
Seo, Y. J., & Woo, H. (2010). The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 55(1), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.002
Şimşek, Ö., Bars, M., & Zengin, Y. (2017). The use of information and communication technologies in the assessment and evaluation process in mathematics instruction. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies (IJOCIS), 7(13), 189-207.
Sugar, W. (2002). Applying human-centered design to technology integration: Three alternative technology perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(1), 12-17.
Süral, İ., & Girmen, P. (2019). Digital assessment in social studies course. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(04), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.548361
Taşlıçay-Arslan, Ș. (2019). New generation exam tool Flipquiz. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(4), 1538-1549. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2019..-518445
Tatlı, Z. (2019). Ölçme değerlendirmede Web 2.0 [Web 2.0 in assessment]. Pegem Publications.
Tatlı, Z., Er-Nas, S., Turan, Ş., & Yaman, H. (2021). Determination of the Classroom Teachers’ Measurement and Assessment Needs in the Emergency Distance Education Processes. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 22(2), 953-987. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.901997
Tatlı, Z., İpek Akbulut, H., & Altınışık, D. (2019). Changing attitudes towards educational technology usage in classroom: Web 2.0 tools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.02.001
Tuluk, A., & Yurdugül, H. (2020). Design and development of a Web based dynamic assessment system to increase students’ learning effectiveness. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(4), 631-656. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.730454
UNESCO. (2020a). School closures caused by Coronavirus (Covid-19). UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
UNESCO. (2020b). Startling digital divides in distance learning emerge. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/news/startling-digital-divides-distance-learning-emerge
UNICEF. (2020). UNICEF and Microsoft launch global learning platform to help address COVID-19 education crisis. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/pressreleases/unicef-and-microsoft-launch-global-learning-platform-help-address-covid19-education
Vitanova, V., Atanasova-Pachemska, T., Iliev, D., & Pachemska, S. (2015). Factors affecting the development of ICT competencies of teachers in primary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1087-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.344
Wang, W.-T., & Wang, C.-C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of webbased learning systems. Computers & Education, 53, 761-774.
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2020, March). WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarksat-the-media-briefing-on-COVID-19
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publisher.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.
Yurdugül, H., & Bayrak, F. (2014). The acceptance of Web based formative assessment system for primary school students. Educational Sciences and Practice,13(26), 167-186.
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar?. Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17-36.
Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers’ perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311-333.