Üniversiteyi Tercih Etme, Akademik İtibar ve Sosyal Etkinlik Arasındaki İlişki: Akdeniz ve Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Lisans Öğrencileri Örneği

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'deki kamu üniversitelerini seçen öğrencilerin tercih nedenlerini belirlemektir. Buna bağlı olarak kamu üniversitelerini tercih eden öğrencilerin seçimlerini hangi faktörlerin ne derece etkili olduğu sorusuna da yanıt aranmaktadır. Mevcut çalışma kapsamında öğrencilerin üniversiteyi seçme kararlarını etkileyen faktörler modellenmiştir. Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modelinde yürütülmüş, hedef evreni temsil etmek üzere Biglan sınıflandırma tekniği uygulanmıştır. Araştırmaya Akdeniz Üniversitesinden 591, Osmangazi Üniversitesinden 453 olmak üzere toplam 1044 birinci sınıf lisans öğrencisi katılmıştır. Araştırmada araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Üniversite Tercih Etme, Sosyal Etkinlikler ve Akademik İtibar ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 20.0 ve LISREL 8.70 istatistik paket programlarından yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmaya göre; lisans öğrencileri sırasıyla üniversitede eğitim alan öğrencilere, üniversitenin sunmuş olduğu maddi olanaklara, yakın tanıdıklara, eğitimin maliyetine, üniversite hakkında bilgilendirilmeye, iş olanaklarına, lise eğitiminin etkisine ve son olarak coğrafi konuma göre üniversite tercihi yapmaktadır. Geliştirilen modele göre; üniversiteyi tercih etmeyi sosyal etkinlik ve akademik itibar doğrudan etkilemektedir. Sosyal etkinliğe katılım arttıkça akademik itibar algısı da artmaktadır

The Relationship between University Choice Desicion, Academic Reputation and Social Activities:Example of Undergraduate Students of Akdeniz and Eskişehir Osmangazi Universities

The purpose of this study was to reveal the factors influencing students' choice of a public university to study. It also aims to reveal the extent to which these factors were influential. The factors influencing students' university choice were modelled. The study was conducted in relational survey model, and Biglan classification scheme was used to represent the target population. The participants of the study are composed of 591 and 453 first-year students from Akdeniz University and Osmangazi University, respectively. University Choice, Social Activities, and Academic Reputation scales developed by the researchers were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 and LISREL 8.70 statistical software packages. The results of the study reveal that the factors influencing first year students' choice of university are the students who are already studying at the university, financial opportunities offered by the university, acquaintances, the cost of education, being informed about the university, job opportunities, the impact of high school education and geographical position, respectively. According to the model, social activities and academic reputation directly affect university choice. As the participation in social activity increases, the perception of academic reputation also increases

___

  • Alise, M. A. (2008). Disciplinary differences in preferred research methods: A comparison of groups in the Biglan classification scheme (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, USA.
  • Anderson, R. E. (1976). Determinants of institutional attractiveness to bright, prospective college students. Research in Higher Education, 4(4), 361-371.
  • Baş, T. (2001). Anket: Anket nasıl hazırlanır? Anket nasıl uygulanır? Anket nasıl değerlendirilir? Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matters in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203.
  • Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structureand output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
  • Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705-722.
  • Briggs, S., & Wilson, A. (2007). Which university? A study of theinfluence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 57-72.
  • Brown, R. C., Hernandez, M. Y., Mitchell, T. D., & Turner, C. R. (1999). Factors influencing student college choice between in-state and out-of- state students. Journal of the Indiana University Student Personel Association. Retrived from https://education.indiana.edu/graduate/ programs/hesa/iuspa/archive/1999/1999-FactorsInfluencing.pdf
  • Bunoti, S. (2012). The quality of higher education in developing countries needs professional support. Retrived from http://www.intconfhighered.org/ FINAL%20Sarah%20Bunoti.pdf
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Ceja, M. (2006). Understanding the role of parents and siblings as Information sources in the college choice process of Chicana students. Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 87-104.
  • Chapman, D. W. (1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of HigherEducation, 52(5), 490-505.
  • Chen, Y., Liu, F., & Fang, C. H. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of word-ofmouth: an elasticity perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(1), 57-77.
  • Conard, M. J.,& Conard, M.A. (2000). An analysis of academic reputation as perceived by consumers of higher education. WCOB Faculty Publications. Paper 180. Retrived from http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wcob_fac/180
  • Dawes, P. L., & Brown, J. (2004). The composition of consideration and choice sets in undergraduate university choice: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 37-59.
  • Galotti, K. M., & Mark, M. C. (1994). How do high school students structure an important life decision? A short - term longitudinal study of the college decision - making process. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 589-607.
  • Hearn, J. (1984). The relative roles of academic ascribed and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education, 57(1), 22-30.
  • Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product attributeinformation on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462.
  • Hossler, D., Braxton, J., & Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. V, NY: Agathon press, 231-288. Retrived fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/200031194_Understanding_Student_College_Choice
  • Jackson, G. (1978). Financial aid and student enrolment. Journal of Higher Education, 49(6), 548-574.
  • Jackson, G. (1982). Public efficiency and private choice in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(2), 237-247.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). Lisrel 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kealy, M. J., & Rockel, M.L. (1987). Student perceptions of college quality The influence of college recruitment policies. Journal of Higher Education, 58(6), 683- 703.
  • Leister, D. V., & Menzel, R. (1976). Assessing the community college transfer market: A metamarketing application. Journal of Higher Education, 47(6), 661-80.
  • Ming, J. S. K. (2010). Institutional factors influencing students' college choice decision in Malaysia: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3), 53-58.
  • Moogan, Y. J., Baron, S., & Harris, K. (1999). Decision-making behaviour of potential higher education students. Higher Education Quarterly, 53(3), 211- 228.
  • Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Sistemi Kılavuzu (2016). Retrived from http://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2015/OSYS/2015
  • Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, I., & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21(10), 212-30.
  • Punj, GN. & Staelin, R. (1978). The choice process for graduate business schools. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(4), 588-598.
  • Reynolds, G. L., & Cain, D. (2006). Final report on the impact of facilities on the recruitment and retention of students. Alexandria, Virginia, USA: APPA Center for Facilities Research. Retrived from https://www.provost.ncsu. edu/governance/standing-committees/library/2006-2007/agendas/ documents/FinalReportFacilitiesImpact.pdf
  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan's classification of academic disciplines. Research in HigherEducation, 44(3), 352-353.
  • Somers, P., Haines, K., & Kene, B. (2006). Toward a theory of choice for community college students. College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(1), 53-67.
  • Soutar, G.N. & Turner, J.P. (2002). Students' preferences for university: a conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40-45.
  • Söderlund, M., & Rosengren, S. (2007). Receiving word-of-mouth from the service customer: An emotion-based effectiveness assessment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), 123-136. Retrived from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.10.001
  • Tatar, E. ve Oktay, M. (2006). Search, choice and persistence for higher education: a case study in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 115-129.
  • Tavares, D., Tavares, O., Justino, E., & Amaral, A. (2008). Students' preferences and needs in Portuguese higher education. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 107-122.
  • Tierney, M. L. (1983). Student college choice sets: Toward an empirical characterization. Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 271-284.
  • Wagner, K. & Fard, PY. (2009). Factors influencing Malaysian students' intention to study at a higher educational institution. Chinese American Scholars Association, New York, New York, USA, Retrieved 11 July, 2012. Retrived from, http://www.g-casa.com/PDF/malaysia/Wagner-Fard.pdf
  • Yamamoto, G.T. (2006). University evaluation-selection: a Turkish case. The International Journal of Educational Management, 20(7), 559-569.