___

• Alarcon, G. M., & Edwards, J. M. (2010). The relationship of engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Stress and Health, 27(3), 294-298.
• Arı, S. (2011). Örgüt ikliminin işle bütünleşme üzerine etkisi ve bir uygulama (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 303751).
• Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17-28.
• Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152.
• Bakker, A. B. (2009). Building engagement in the workplace. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The peak performing organization (pp. 50-72). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
• Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 74-88.
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(3), 209-223.
• Bakker, A. B., Gierveld, J. H., & Van Rijswijk, K. (2006). Succesfactoren bij vrouwelijke schoolleiders in het primair onderwijs: Een onderzoek naar burnout, bevlogenheid en prestaties (Success factors among female school principals in primary teaching: A Study onburnout, work engagement, and performance). Retrieved from http://www.onderwijsarbeidsmarkt. nl/sectoren/primair-onderwijs/
• Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 147-154.
• Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22(3), 187-200.
• Bal, E. A. (2008). Self-efficacy, contextual factors and well-being: The impact of work engagement (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 221379).
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
• Bermejo, L., Hernández-Franco, V., & Prieto-Ursşa, M. (2013). Teacher well- being: Personal and job resources and demands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 84, 1321-1325.
• Bollen, K. A. (1987). Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 37-69.
• Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Hetland, J. (2012). The measurement of state work engagement: A multilevel factor analytic study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 305-312.
• Brown, R. L. (1997). Assessing specific mediational effects in complex theoretical models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 142-156.
• Cevrioğlu, E. (2007). Lider-üye etkileşimi ile bireysel ve örgütsel sonuçlar arasındaki ilişki: Ampirik bir inceleme (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 205628).
• Cheung, M. W.-L. (2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 227-246.
• Christian, M. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2007). Work engagement: A meta-analytic review and directions for research in an emerging area. Paper presented at the Sixty-Seventh Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://aom.pace.edu/proceedings.
• Chughtai, A., & Buckley, F. (2008). Work engagement and its relationship with state and trait trust: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 10(1), 47-71.
• Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sarıkaya, H. (2005). Turkish version of the teachers' sense http://people.ehe.ohiostate.edu/ahoy/files/2009/02/ttses.pdf scale (TTSES). Retrieved from
• Çetin, Ş. (2011). Okul müdürlerinin liderliği ile müdür-öğretmen ilişkisinin öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi (Doktora tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 290711).
• Dalay, G. (2007). The relationship between the variables of organizational trust, job engagement, organizational commitment and job involvement (Master thesis). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 209238).
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Janssen, P. P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, & Health, 27(4), 279-286.
• Eryılmaz, A. ve Doğan, T. (2012). İş yaşamında öznel iyi oluş: Utrecht işe bağlılık ölçeğinin psikometrik niteliklerinin incelenmesi. Klinik Psikiyatri, 15, 49-55.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (Seventh Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Güneşer, A. B. (2007). The effect of person-organization fit on organizational commitment and work engagement: the role of person-supervisor fit (Doctoral dissertation). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 208825).
• Hakanen, J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. The Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495- 513.
• Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven- year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2-3), 415-424.
• Hallberg, U. E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). "Same same" but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11(2), 119-127.
• Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In Arnold B. Bakker & Michael P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102-117). The United Kingdom: Psychology.
• Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
• Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press
• Hİigaard, R., Giske, R., & Sundsli, K. (2012). Newly qualified teachers' work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347-357.
• Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2011). Positive psychology and educational administration: An optimistic research agenda. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 427-445.
• Hoyle, R.H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692- 724.
• Kirkpatrick, C. L. (2009). Engaging second-stage teachers in their work: The role of professional culture in schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI: 3385024).
• Koçak, E. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin yetki devri, otonomi ve hesap verebilirliklerine ilişkin algılarının belirlenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 278416).
• Konermann, J. (2011). Teachers' work engagement: A deeper understanding of the role of job and personal resources in relationship to work engagement, its antecedents, and its outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). 20/11/2012 tarihinde http://purl.utwente.nl/publications /79200 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
• Koyuncu, M., Burke, R. J., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2006). Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bank: Potential antecedents and consequences. Equal Opportunities International, 25(4), 299-310.
• Kreis, K., & Brockopp, D. Y. (1986). Autonomy: A component of teacher job satisfaction. Education, 107(1), 110-115.
• Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
• Liao-Holbrook, F. (2012). Integrating leader fairness and leader-member exchange in predicting work engagement: A contingency approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI: 1532615).
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
• Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825-841.
• Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
• MacEachen, E., Polzer, J., & Clarke, J. (2008). ''You are free to set your own hours'': Governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Social Science & Medicine, 66(5), 1019-1033.
• Mache, S., Vitzthum, K., Klapp, B. F., & Danzer, G. (2014). Surgeons' work engagement: Influencing factors and relations to job and life satisfaction. The Surgeon, 12(4):181-190.
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, USA: Taylor & Francis.
• MacKinnon, D. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 141-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
• Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54: 77-87.
• Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Makikangas, A., & Feldt, T. (2010). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A qualitative review and directions for future research. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), The handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 111- 128). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Do-it-yourself: An individual positive psychology intervention to promote positive emotions, self-efficacy, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 18(2), 173-195.
• Öncel, L. (2007). Öğretmenlerin işleriyle bütünleşme düzeylerinin performansları ve iş yerlerinden ayrılma niyetleriyle ilişkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 211897).
• Öner, Z. H. (2008). The mediating effect of organizational justice: Moderating roles of sense of coherence and job complexity on the relationship between servant leadership, and work engagement (Doctoral dissertation). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi'nden edinilmiştir. (Tez No: 221819).
• Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. C., (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-177.
• Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, M. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
• Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.
• Rothmann, S., Jorgensen, L. I., & Hill, C. (2011). Coping and work engagement in selected South African organizations. SA Journalof Industrial Psychology/SATydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 37(1), 1-11.
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004a). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004b). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Retrieved from http://www.schaufeli.com
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007a). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds), Research in Social Issues in Management: Managing Social and Ethical Issues in Organizations, Vol. 5 (135-177). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007b). Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 20(2), 177-196.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzàlez-Romà, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A two sample confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
• Schmitt, A., Zacher, H., & Lange, A. H. (2013). Focus on opportunities as a boundary condition of the relationship between job control and work engagement: A multi-sample, multi-method study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 505-519.
• Segers, J., DePrins, P., & Brouwers, S. (2010). Leadership and engagement: A brief review of the literature, a proposed model, and practical implications. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), The handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice(pp. 149-158). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
• Seppala, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 459-481.
• Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In D. Ganster & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Research in organizational stress and well-being. (Vol. 3, pp. 135- 165). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian school teachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285-304.
• Simons, J. C., & Buitendach, J. H. (2013). Psychological capital, work engagement and organizational commitment amongst call centre employees in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), 1-12.
• Sinclair, V. G., & Wallston, K. A. (2004). The development and psychometric evaluation of the brief resilient coping scale. Assessment, 11, 94-101.
• Slöetjes, T. (2012). Personal resources in the job demands-resources model: The influence of proactive behavior, assertiveness, and worker flexibility (Master thesis). Retrieved from http://studenttheses.library.uu.nl/search.php
• Tomas, J. M., Melendez, J. C., Sancho, P., & Mayordomo, T. (2012). Adaptation and initial validation ofthe BRCS in an elderly Spanish sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 283-289.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
• Turgut, T. (2011). Çalışmaya tutkunluk: İş yükü, esnek çalışma saatleri, yönetici desteği ve iş-aile çatışması ile ilişkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3-4), 155-179.
• Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 22(3), 277-294.
• Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2010). Personal resources and work engagement in the face of change. In J. Houdmont and S. Leka (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice, volume 1 (pp. 124- 150). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121-141.
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2009a). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235-244.
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009b). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183-200.