Güney Kore'nin Kalkınmasında Kültür ve Devlet - State and Culture in South Korean Development
Güney Kore'nin ekonomik gelişmesindeki başarısı, diğer ülkelere örnek teşkil edip edemeyeceği açısından yoğun bir araştırma konusu olmuştur. Bu makale Güney Kore'de "kalkınmacı devlet" in ekonomik büyümedeki rolünü derinlemesine bir incelemeye tabi tutmakta ve toplum-devlet ilişkisi, uluslararası güçler ve kültürel niteliklerin özgün bir bileşimininin devletin ekonomik büyümeyi gerçekleştirmesinde büyük bir rol oynadığını ileri sürmektedir. Dolayısıyla Güney Kore'ye özgü koşulların diğer ülkelerde tekrar edilemeyeceği sonucuna ulaşmaktadır ki bu da Güney Kore'nin gelişmesini serbest piyasa ekonomisinin bir zaferi olarak gören Neo-Klasik yaklaşımla taban tabana zıt düşmektedir. Ama gene de Güney Kore deneyi diğer ülkelerin dikkate alması gereken şu ilginç sonuçları ortaya koymaktadır. Birincisi bazı devletlerin ekonomik büyümede önemli bir rol oynayabileceği. Ama burda dikkat edilmesi gereken nokta devletin toplumla olan ilişkisinin niteliğinin ekonomik sorunlara müdahalesinin başarısında çok etkin bir rol oynayacağı gerçeğidir. Ayrıca uluslararası ilişkiler ve ulusal kültür yapısı da devletin ekonomiye müdahalesinde bir yerde belirleyici olabilir
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Güney Kore, ekonomik kalkınma, kültür
Güney Kore'nin Kalkınmasında Kültür ve Devlet/State and Culture in South Korean Development
Economic growth in South Korea has been widely examined in the hopes that it can provide a model which can be applicable lsewhere in the world. The article takes an in depth analysis of the developmental state in South Korea and its role in the achievement of growth. it argues that the state's role in bringing about economic transformation was facilitated by a unique combination of state-society relations, international forces and cultural endowments. While neo-classical nd market friendly interpretations are influential. neither are congruent with the experience of South Korea whose economic growth has been shaped by a developmental state strengthened by its relationship with society and within the international system. Due to the uniqueness ofSouth Korean development it is not conducive asa model to be replicated in other LDCs. However, South Korean experience can provide some useful insights far other countries: certain states can play a key role in economic growth, their ties to society will effect the ability to effectively intervene in economic affa irs, these ties may be affected by the involvement of international actors as well as the·unique cultural endowments which exist, the international system must be conducive to growth and above and beyond anything else countries must develop strategies which are unique to their own individual circumstances.
Keywords:
Güney Kore Ekonomik Kalkınma, Kültür, Devlet,
___
Amsden, Alice (1989). Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Jndustrialisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Amsden Alice and Yoon-Dae Euh (1993). "Sbuth Korea's 1980s Financial Reforms: ' good-by Financial Repression (Maybe), Hello New lnstitutional Restraints", World Development, 21 (3): 379-390.
Amsden, Alice (1994a). "Review article of 'Making Capitalism: The Social and Cultural Construction of a South Korean Conglorrierate' and 'The Culture of Korean ındustry: An Ethnography of Poongsan Corporation"', Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32(2): 452-455 ..
Amsden Alice (1994b). "Why isn't the Whole world Experimenting with the East Asian ' Model to Develop7: Review of The E:ast Asian Miracle", World Development, 22(4): 627-633.
Appelbaum, Richard P. and Jeffrey Henderson (eds_.) (~992). States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim, London: Sage Publıcatıons. t ,.
Berger, Peter, L. (1987). The Capita/ist Revo/ution: Fi~ P:opositietfıs Ab~u'. Prosperity, Equality, and Liberty, Aldershot: Gower Publıshıng Company Lımıted.
Berger, Peter, L. and Hsin-Huang M. Hsiao (eds.) (1988)._in Sear:h of An East Asian . Development Model, New Brunswick: Transactıon Publıshers.
Brandt, Vincent and Lee Man-Gap ( 1981 ). "Community Develo~ment in the ~ep~blic ~f Korea" in Dore, Community Development: Comparatıve Case Studıes ın lndıa, the Republic of Korea, Mexico and Tanzania içinde Ron.ald & Mars, Zoe (eds.). London: Croom Helm Ltd.
castells Manuel (1992). "Four Asian Tigers With a Dragon Head: A Comparative Analysis ' of the State, Economy, and Society in the Asian Pacific Rim", States and Deve/opment in the Asian Pacific Rim içinde Richard P. Appelbaum and Jeffrey Henderson (eds.). London: Sage Publications. Cummings, Bruce (1984). "Northeast Asian Political Economy", Jnternational Organisation, 38 (11): 1-40.
Deyo, Frederick C. ( 1987). "State and labour: modes of political exclusion in East Asian development", in The Political Economy of the New Asian Jndustrialism Frederick Deyo (ed.). London: Cornell University Press.
Duncan, John ( 1994). "Confucianism in the Late Koryo and Early Choson", Korean Studies (18): 76-102.
Eckert, (arter (1993). "The South Korean bourgeoisie: A Class in Search of Hegemony" in State and Society in Contemporary Korea Hagen Koo (ed.). London: Cornell University Press.
Evans, Peter ( 1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and lndustrial Transformation, West Sussex: Princeton University Press.
Evans, Peter ( 1996). "Embedded Autonomy and lndustrial ı'ransformation", in Political Power and Social Theory Diane Davis (ed.). 1 O: 259-282.
Friedman, Edward (1996). "Review Article: Leaming from East Asian Economic Success: Avoiding,~ the Pitfalls of Soviet-Style Developmentalist Dead Ends", Economic Deve/opment and Cultural Change, 44(4).
Gereffi, G. ( 1990). "Paths of lndustrialisation: an overview", in Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of lndustrialisation in East Asia and Latin America G. Gereffi and D.L. Wyman (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Granovetter, Mark and Richard Swedberg (eds.) (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life, Oxford: Westview Press.
Haggard, Stephan (1990). Pathways from the Periphery: The Po/itics of Growth in the Newly Jndustria/ising Countries. London: Cornell University Press.
Haggard, Stephan and Chun-in Moon (1993). "The State, Politics, and Economic Development in Post-war South Korea" in State and Society in Contemporary Korea Ha-en Koo (ed.). London: Cornell University Press.
Hamilton, Gary and Nicole Woolsey Biggart (1992). "Market, Culture, c;ınd Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organisation in the Far East", in The Socio/ogy of Economic Life Mark Granovetter, and Richard Swedberg (eds.). Oxford: Westview Press.
Hart- Landsberg, Martin (1993)·. The Rush to Development: Economic Change and Political Struggle in South Korea, New York: Monthly Review Press.
Hoogvelt, Ankie (1997). Globalisation and the Postco/onial World: The New Politica/ Economy of Development, London: Macmillan Press Ltd. Janelli, Roger and Kim Dawnhee, (1993). Making Capitalism: the Social and Cultura/ Construction ofa South Korean Conglomerate, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Johnson, Chalmers ( 1987). "Political lnstitutions and Economic Performance: The Government Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan", in The Politica/ Economy of the New Asian lndustrialism Frederick Deyo. London: Cornell University Press.
Jun, Joosung (1994). "Taxes and Foreign direct lrıvestment in Korea", in The Korean Economy, ata Crossroad: Development Prospects, Liberalisation, and South North Economic lntegration Sung, Yeung Kwack (ed.). London: Praeger Publishers.
Kearney, Richard (1990). "Mauritius and the NIC Model Redux: Or How Many Cases Make a Model?", The Journal of Developing Areas, 24: 195-216.
Kim, Kwan-suk arid Park Joon-kyung ( 1985). Sources of Economic Growth in Korea: 79637982, Seoul: Korea Development lnstitute.
Kim, Wuee-Young {1988). "Korea's Confucian Heritage and Social Change", Journal of Developing Societies. 4(2): 255-269.
Kim, Dae-Jung {1994). "Is culture destiny? The myth of Asia's anti democratic values", Foreign Affairs. Vol. 73, No. 6: 189-194.
Kim, Choong Soon {1992). The Culture of Korean lndustry: An Etfmography of Poongsan Corporation. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Koo, Hagen and Eun Mee Kim (1992). "The Developmental State and Capital Accumulation in South Korea", in States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim Richard P. Appelbaum and Jeffrey Henderson .(eds.). London: Sage Publications.
Koo, Hagen {1987). "The lnterplay of State , Social Class, and Worlö System in East Asian , Development: The (ases of South Korea and Taiwan", in The Political Economy of the New Asian Jndustrialism Frederick Deyo (ed.). London: Cornell University Press.
Kuznets, Paul W. (1988). "An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan and South Korea." Economic Development and Cultural Change. 36(3): SIO - 543, Supplement.
Kuznets, Paul W. (1994). Korean Economic Development: An lnterpretative Model, London: Praeger Publishers.
Kwon, Jene {1994). "The East Asia Challenge to Neo-classical Orthodoxy", World Development, 22(4): 635-644.
Lee, Chung H. {1990). "Culture and lnstitutions in the Economic Development of Korea", Korean Studie~: Vol. 14: 39-49.
Luedde-Neurath ( 1988). "Stat.e lntervention and Export-oriented Development in South Korea", in Developmental States in East Asia White, Gordon (ed.). London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
McGuire, James (1994). "Development Policy and lts Determinants in East Asia and Latin America." Journal of Public Policy, 14(2): 205-242 ·
Morris, Paul and Colin Marsh {1992). "Curriculum patterns and issues in East Asia: a comparative survey of seven East Asian societies", Education Policy, 7(3): 251-266.
NCS 48 Draft Paper, 26 October 1949, in NC~ ~aterials, box 207, Harry S. Truman Library. Öniş, Ziya (1992). "The East Asian Model of Deiıelopment and the Turkish case: A Comparative Analysis", METU Studies in Development, 19(4): 495-528.
Pye, Lucian. (1988). "The New Asian ~~pitalism: A Political Portrait:J.Jn Searc:h of a_n East Asian Development Model ıçınde Berger, Peter, L. and Hsın-Huan, M. Hsıao (eds.). NewBrunswick:Transaction Publishers.
Seth, Michael (1997). "Strong State or Strong Society?: Educational Development in South Korea, 1961-66." Korean Studies, 21: 72-95.
Steinberg, David (1991 ). The Republic of Korea: economic transformations and social change. London:. Westview Press.
Swindler, Ann {1986). "Culture in Action: symbols and strategies", American Sociofogical Review, 51: 272-86.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) {1997). Human Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ISSN: 1301-7241
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1998
- Yayıncı: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Modernin "Yasası" Olarak Kamp: Şiddet ve Politika Uzerine Bir Değerlendirme
Teknik, Teknoloji ve "Miınari" Yaratıcılık Bina Üretimine Dair Birkaç Olay ve Örnek
Güney Kore'nin Kalkınmasında Kültür ve Devlet - State and Culture in South Korean Development
Akademik Kurumsallaşma veya "Disiplin Yöntemleri"
Behice Boran 'ın İletişim Alanına Katkıları
Coğrafya, Kültür ve Siyaset: Suriye'de Esad Rejimini Biçimleyen Koşullar ve Etmenler