Volkan EMREN, Uğur KOCABAŞ, Fatih LEVENT, Ersin Çağrı ŞİMŞEK, Emre ÖZDEMİR, Nihan KAHYA EREN, Cem NAZLI, Mehmet TOKAÇ

Nörojenik Senkop Geçiren Hastalarda Sağ Ventrikül Kontraksiyonunun Rolü

Giriş: Nörojenik senkopun erken safhasında sol ventrikül kontraktilite artışının önemli rolü olduğu düşünülmektedir. Fakat senkop esnasında sağ ventrikül fonksiyonu net olarak ortaya konmamıştır. Bu çalışmada eğik masa testinde (EMT) nörojenik senkop geçiren hastalarda sağ ventrikül fonksiyonu değerlendirilmiştir. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Ocak 2016 ve Mart 2017 tarihleri arasında senkop geçiren 89 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Tüm hastalara EMT ve ardından transtorasik ekokardiyografi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Eğik masa testinde 50 hastada senkop gelişmiştir. Senkop gelişen ve gelişmeyen hastalarda cinsiyet, yaş ve ejeksiyon fraksiyonu açısından fark gözlenmemiştir (p> 0.05). Mitral lateral anüler sistolik (s’) velositesi (14 ± 3.8’e karşı 13.3 ± 3.6 p= 0.625), septal anuler s’ velositesi (11 ± 3.7’ye karşı 10.3 ± 2 p= 0.951) senkop gelişen ve gelişmeyen hastalarda benzer izlenmiştir. Fakat senkop geçiren hastalarda triküspit lateral anüler s’ velositesi daha yüksek saptanmıştır (17 ± 2.7’e karşı 15.1 ± 3.0, p= 0.003). Sonuç: Eğik masa testinde senkop gelişen hastalarda sol ventrikül fonksiyonları değişmezken sağ ventrikül kontraksiyonunda artış gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Ekokardiyografi, eğik masa testi, nörojenik senkop

The Role of Right Ventricular Contractility in Patients Who Experienced Neurogenic Syncope

Introduction: Left ventricular hyper contractility has been thought to have a major role at early phases of vasovagal syncope. However the right ventricular function during syncope has not been delineated clearly. The present study evaluated the right myocardial contractility in patients who experienced vasovagal syncope during head-up tilt test (HUTT). Patients and Methods: A total of 89 Patients, who experienced syncope between January 2012 and March 2014, were included in the study. All the patients underwent HUTT and were followed by transthoracic echocardiography. Results: Fifty patients experienced syncope during HUTT. There was no significant difference between the patients, who experienced syncope versus who did not, in terms of gender, age, ejection fraction (p> 0.05). Mitral lateral annular systolic (s’) velocity (14 ± 3.8 vs. 13.3 ± 3.6; p= 0.625), septal annular s’ velocity (11 ± 3.7 vs. 10.3 ± 2; p= 0.951) were similar following HUTT in patients with and without syncope respectively. However, tricuspid valve lateral annular s’ velocity after tilt testing was higher in patients, who experienced syncope (17 ± 2.7 vs. 15.1 ± 3.0; p= 0.003). Conclusion: While left ventricular functions are not affected, right ventricular contraction is more powerful in patients who experience syncope during HUTT.

Keywords:

Echocardiography, head-up tilt testing, neurogenic syncope,

PDF

___

1. Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). European Heart J 2009;30: 2631-71.
2. Blanc JJ, L’Her C, Touiza A, Garo B, L’Her E, Mansourati J. Prospective evaluation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J 2002;23:815-20.
3. Alshekhlee A, Shen WK, Mackall J, Chelimsky TC. Incidence and mortality rates of syncope in the United States. Am J Med 2009;122:181-8.
4. Vigar S, Bradley D, Shen W. Syncope units: impact on patient care and health related costs. Cardiol Clin 2013;31:39-49.
5. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Bartoletti A, Giada F, Lagi A, Ungar A, et al. A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals. Eur Heart J 2006;27:76-82.
6. Krediet CT, van Dijk N, Linzer M, van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W. Management of vasovagal syncope: controlling or aborting faints by leg crossing and muscle tensing. Circulation 2002;106:1684-9.
7. Kapoor WN. Syncope. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1856-62.
8. Zaqqa M, Massumi A. Neurally mediated syncope. Tex Heart Institute J 2000;27:268-72.
9. Benditt DG, Sakaguchi S, Schultz JJ, Remole S, Adler S, Lurie KG. Diagnostic considerations and the role of tilt table testing. Cardiol Rev 1993;1:146-56.
10. Brignole M, Menozzi C, Del Rosso A, Costa S, Gaggioli G, Bottoni N, et al. New classification of haemodynamics of vasovagal syncope: beyond the VASIS classification Analysis of the pre-syncopal phase of the tilt test without and with nitroglycerin challenge. Vasovagal Syncope International Study. Europace 2000;2:66-76.
11. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al; American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee; Task Force on Chamber Quantification; American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee; American Heart Association; European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:79-108.
12. Shalev Y, Gal R, Tchou PJ, Anderson AJ, Avitall B, Akhtar M, et al. Echocardiographic demonstration of decreased left ventricular dimensions and vigorous myocardial contraction during syncope induced by head-up tilt. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:746-51.
13. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Fernandez-Violante R, Tank J, Snell M, Cunningham G, Furlan R. Yohimbine in neurally mediated syncope. Pathophysiological implications. J Clin Invest 1998;102:1824-30.
14. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Fernandez-Violante R, Desai T, Snell M, Jarai Z. Sympathetic and baroreceptor reflex function in neurally mediated syncope evoked by tilt. J Clin Invest1997;99:2736-44.
15. Ellenbogen KA, Morillo CA, Wood MA, Gilligan DM, Eckberg DL, Smith ML. Neural monitoring of vasovagal syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:788-94.
16. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Tank J, Fernandez-Violante R. The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope. Circulation 2000;102:2898-906.
17. Forleo C, Guida P, Iacoviello M, Resta M, Monitillo F, Sorrentino S, et al. Head-up tilt testing for diagnosing vasovagal syncope: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:27-35.
18. Moon J, Kim H, Kim JY, Chung S, Choi EY, Min PK. Left ventricular hypercontractility immediately after tilting triggers a disregulated cardioinhibitory reaction in vasovagal syncope: echocardiographic evaluation during the head-up tilt test. Cardiology 2010;117:118-23.
19. Goel R, Caracciolo G, Wilansky S, Scott LR, Narula J, Sengupta PP. Effect of head-up tilt-table testing on left ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with neurogenic syncope. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1252-7.
20. Appleton CP, Jensen JL, Hatle LK, Oh JK. Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997;10:271-91.
21. Gulati VK, Katz WE, Follansbee WP, Gorcsan J. Mitral annular descent velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography as an index of global left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:979-84.
22. Yamada H, Oki T, Tabata T, Iuchi A, Ito S. Assessment of left ventricular systolic wall motion velocity with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging: comparison with peak dP/dt of the left ventricular pressure curve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:442-9.
23. Folino AF, Russo G, Buja G, Iliceto S. Contribution of decreased atrial function in the pathogenesis of neurally mediated syncope. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:1017-24.
24. Mangin L, Kobeissi A, Lelouche D, Dhérouville TY, Mansier P, Swynghedauw B, et al. Simultaneous analysis of heart rate variability and myocardial contractility during head-up tilt in patients with vasovagal syncope. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:639-44.

ISSN: 2149-2972
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
Başlangıç: 1990
Yayıncı: Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kartal Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi