205

AMAÇ: Genel anestezi altında endotrakeal entübasyon gerektiren hastalarda dua eden işareti (DEİ) ve avuç içi baskısı (AİB) testlerinin görülme sıklığını belirleyip, zor entübasyon tanı yöntemleri olan ağız açıklığı, baş boyun ekstansiyonu, mandibulanın malpozisyonu, tiromental mesafe, modifiye Mallampati skoru (MMS), Cormack ve Lehane skoru (CLS) ile ilişkisini araştırmayı amaçladık. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmamız; elektif şartlarda, genel anestezi altında ameliyat olan ASA I-III 330 hastayı kapsadı. Anestezi polikliniğine başvuran hastaların demografik özellikleri, zor entübasyon hikayesi ve kronik hastalıkları kayıt edildi. Ayrıca baş ekstansiyon, mandibulanın malpozisyonu, ağız açıklığı ve tiromental mesafe ölçümleri; MMS, DEİ ve AİB testleri uygulandı. Hastalara en az iki yıl deneyimli anestezi doktoru tarafından entübasyon gerçekleştirildi. Kullanılan laringoskop ve bleyd türü, endotrakeal tüp, rehber tel, CLS, larinks maske, entübasyon larinks maske, fiberoptik entübasyon kullanımına, dışarıdan bası uygulama gerekliliği, zor entübasyon varlığı ve olası komplikasyonlar belirlendi. P

RELATIONHIPS BETWEEN PALM PRINT AND PRAYER SIGN TESTS WITH DIFFICULTCULT INTUBATION DIAGNOSIS TESTS

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the prayer sign (PS) and palm print (PP) tests for diicult intubation diagnostic tests including open mouth distance, movement of neck and mandibula, thyromental distance, modified Mallampati scores (MMS), and Cormack-Lehane scores (CLS) in patients who required endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty patients as ASA I-III status who required endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia were included in this study. Patient’s demographic datas and chronic diseases were recorded. Diagnostic tests including open mouth distance, movement of neck and mandibula, thyromental distance, MMS, PS and PP tests were performed to all patients and recorded. All patients were intubated by an anesthesiologist who has at least two year experience. The kind of laryngoscope and blade, CLS, the necessity of guide, laryngeal mask airway, intubation laryngeal mask airway, fiber optic intubation, and cricoid pressure, the incidence of the diicult intubation were recorded. P

___

1. Keçik Y(Editör). Temel anestezi. In: Alkış N. Zor havayolu. 1.Baskı, Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitapevi. 2012: 907-15.

2. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of diicult airway: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on management of the diicult airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118(2): 251-70.

3. C. Frerk, V. S. Mitchell, A. F. McNarry et al. Diicult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated diicult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115(6): 827–48.

4. Reissell E, Orko R, Maunuksela EL, Lindgren L. Predictability of diicult laryngoscopy in patients with long-term diabetes mellitus. Anaesthesia 1990; 45(12): 1024-7.

5. Erden V, Basaranoglu G, Delatioglu H, Hamzaoglu. NS Relationship of diicult laryngoscopy to long-term non-İnsulin dependent diabetes and hand abnormality detected using the 'prayer sign'. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91(1): 159-60.

6. Rae R, Kinsella J, Daniel M, Booth M. The palm print as predict of diicult intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45(8): 1053.

7. Nadal JL, Fernandez BG, Escobar IC, Black M, Rosenblatt WH.The palm print as a sensitive predictor of diicult laryngoscopy in diabetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998 ; 42(2): 199-203.

8. Vani V, Kamath SK, Naik LD. The palm print as a sensitive redictor of diicult laryngoscopy in diabetics: a comparison with other airway evaluation indices. J Postgrad Med 2000; 46(2):75-9.

9. Singh VP, Bali A, Singh N, Jaggi AS. Advanced glycation end products and diabetic complications. The Korean J of Physiology & Pharmacology 2014;18(1):1-14.

10. Megan L Krause, Eric L. Matteson. Perioperative management of the patient with rheumatoid arthritis. World J Orthop 2014; 5(3): 283-91.

11. Salzarulo HH, Taylor LA. Diabetic “sti joint syndrome” a cause of diicult endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 366-368.

12. Chang K, Uitto J, Rowold EA, Grant GA, Kilo C, Williamson JR. Increased collagen cross linkages in experimental diabetes, reversal by B-amino proprionitrile and D-penicillamine. Diabetes 1980; 29(10): 778-81.

13. Hogan K, Rusy D, Springman SR. Diicult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 1161- 5.

14. Hasim K, Thomas M. Sensitivity of palm print sign in prediction of diicult laryngoscopy in diabetes: A comparison with other airway indices. Indian J Anaesth 2014; 58(3): 298–302.

15. George SP, Jacob R. Predictability of airway evaluation indices in diabetic patients. Indian J Anaesth 2003; 47(6):476-8.

16. Mahmoodpoor A, Soleimanpour H. Sensitivity of palm print, modified Mallampati score and 3-3-2 rule in prediction of diicult intubation. Int J Prev Med 2013; 4(9): 1063-9.