Psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkide üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rolü

Bu araştırmanın amaçlarından biri kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma yolları ve patolojik üstbilişler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Araştırmanın ikinci amacı ise psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkide patolojik üstbilişlerin ve başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rollerini değerlendirmektir. Çalışma kapsamında 18-65 yaşları arasında 292’si kadın (%65.6), 153’ü erkek (%34.4) toplam 445 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Katılımcılara, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri, Yetişkinler için Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği, Başa Çıkma Yolları Envanteri ve ÜstBiliş Ölçeği-30 uygulanmıştır. Kaygı, psikolojik dayanıklılık, başa çıkma yolları ve patolojik üstbilişler arasındaki ilişkileri değerlendirmek için korelasyon analizi, değişkenlerin kaygıyı yordama güçlerini görmek için hiyerarşik regresyon analizi ve patolojik üstbilişler ile başa çıkma yollarının durumsal aracılık rollerini değerlendirmek için durumsal aracılık analizi yapılmıştır. Korelasyon analizine göre patolojik üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yolları arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır. Diğer ilişkilere ait korelasyon katsayılarının .10 ile .61 arasında değiştiği görülmektedir. Regresyon analizine göre psikolojik dayanıklılık, patolojik üstbilişler ve başa çıkma yolları değişkenleri kaygıya ait varyansın %58’ini açıklamaktadır. Son olarak patolojik üstbilişlerin, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık ettiği ve bu aracılık ilişkisinde duygusal başa çıkmanın düzenleyici rolünün olduğu görülmektedir. Mevcut çalışmanın sonuçlarına bir bütün olarak bakıldığında psikolojik dayanıklılığın, üstbilişsel süreçlerin ve başa çıkma yollarının kaygının önemli açıklayıcıları oldukları ve özellikle terapötik müdahalelerde söz konusu değişkenlerin çalışılmasının önemli olabileceği söylenebilir.

The moderated mediation role of metacognitions and ways of coping in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety

One of the purposes of this study was to examine the relationships between anxiety, psychological resilience, ways of coping, and pathological metacognition. The second purpose was to evaluate the moderated mediating role of pathological metacognition and ways of coping in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety. Within the scope of the study, data was collected from 445 individuals of whom 292 (65.6%) were females and 153 (34.4%) were males. The participants completed Demographic Information Form, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Resilience Scale for Adults, the Ways of Coping Inventory and the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30. Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationships between anxiety, psychological resilience, ways of coping, and pathological metacognitions; hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to see the predictive power of the variables on anxiety and moderated mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the moderated mediator roles of pathological metacognitions and ways of coping. According to the correlation analyses, there was no statistically significant relationship between pathological metacognitions and ways of coping. Correlation coefficients related to other relationships ranged between .10 and .61. According to the regression results psychological resilience, pathological metacognitions, and ways of coping explained 58% of the variance of anxiety. Finally, the findings indicated that pathological metacognitions had a mediating role in the relationship between psychological resilience and anxiety, and that emotional coping moderated this mediation. Taking all the findings of the current study together, it can be argued that psychological resilience, pathological metacognitions, and ways of coping are important factors in explaining anxiety and that working on these variables especially in a therapeutical context can be beneficial.

___

  • Clary, E. G., & Miller, J. (1986). Socialization and situational influences on sustained altruism. Child Development, 57, 1358-1369.
  • Avero, P., Corace, K. M., Endler, N. S., & Calvo, M. G. (2003). Coping styles and threat processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 843-861.
  • Bahtiyar, B., & Gençöz, T. (2018). The association between metacognition and social anxiety: Moderator role of coping strategies. T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 57-78.
  • Basım, N., & Çetin, F. (2011). Yetişkinler için psikolojik dayanıklılık ölçeğinin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 22(2), 104-114.
  • Brailovskaia, J., Schönfeld, P., Zhang, X. C., Bieda, A., Kochetkov, Y., & Margraf, J. A. (2018). Cross-cultural study in Germany, Russia, and China: Are resilient and social supported students protected against depression, anxiety, and stress? Psychological Reports, 121(2), 265- 281.
  • Booth, J. W., & Neill, J.T. (2017). Coping strategies and the development of psychological resilience. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 20, 47-54.
  • Cisler, J. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Emotion regulation and anxiety disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14(3), 182-187.
  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Compas, B. E. (2002). Vulnerability to social stress: Coping as a mediator or moderator of sociotropy and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 39-55.
  • Corcoran, K. M., & Segal, Z. V. (2008). Metacognition in depressive and anxiety disorders: Current directions. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(1), 33-44.
  • Cüceloğlu, D. (1991). İnsan ve davranışı (2. edition). Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Dağ, İ. (1999). Psikolojinin ışığında kaygı. Doğu Batı, 6, 167-174.
  • Davey, G. C., & Wells, A. (Ed.). (2006). Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dragan, M., & Dragan, W. (2014). Temperament and anxiety: The mediating role of metacognition. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(2), 246-254.
  • Dragan, M., Dragan, W. Ł., Kononowicz, T., & Wells, A. (2012). On the relationship between temperament, metacognition, and anxiety: Independent and mediated effects. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 25(6), 697-709.
  • Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Sage.
  • Ebner, K., & Singewald, N. (2017). Individual differences in stress susceptibility and stress inhibitory mechanisms. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 54-64.
  • Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience:A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12-23.
  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219-239.
  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Ways of coping questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Foster, J. R. (1997). Successful coping, adaptation and resilience in the elderly: An interpretation of epidemiologic data. Psychiatric Quarterly, 68(3), 189-219.
  • Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., & Martinussen M. (2003). A new rating scale for adult resilience: What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 65-76.
  • Gençöz, F., Gençöz, T., & Bozo, Ö. (2006). Hierarchical dimensions of coping styles: A study conducted with Turkish university students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(5), 525-534.
  • Genet, J. J., & Siemer, M. (2011). Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience. Cognition & Emotion, 25(2), 380-388.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2. edition). Guilford Publications.
  • Kay, S. (2016). Emotion regulation and resilience: Overlooked connections. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 411-415.
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
  • Leahy, R., Wupperman, P., Edwards, E., Shivaji, S., & Molina, N. (2018). Metacognition and emotional schemas: Effects on depression and anxiety. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 12(1), 25-37.
  • Matthews, G., Panganiban, A. R., Wells, A., Wohleber, R. W., & Reinerman-Jones, L. E. (2019). Metacognition, hardiness, and grit as resilience factors in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) operations: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 640.
  • Mayordomo, T., Viguer, P., Sales, A. Satorres, E., & Meléndez, J. C. (2016). Resilience and coping as predictors of well-being in adults. The Journal of Psychology, 150(7), 809-821.
  • Newman, M. G., Llera, S. J., Erickson, T. M., Przeworski, A., & Castonguay, L. G. (2013). Worry and generalized anxiety disorder: a review and theoretical synthesis of evidence on nature, etiology, mechanisms, and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 275-297.
  • Öner, N., & Le Compte, A. (1985). Durumluk-sürekli kaygı envanteri elkitabı. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
  • Öztürk, M. O., & Uluşahin A. (2014). Ruh sağlığı ve bozuklukları. (12. edition). Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Piryaei, S., & Khademi, M. (2014). The moderating role of metacognition in relationship of perceived job stress and negative affect. European Psychiatry, 29(1), 1.
  • Quiles, C., Prouteau, A., & Verdoux, H. (2015). Associations between self-esteem, anxiety and depression and metacognitive awareness or metacognitive knowledge. Psychiatry Research, 230(2), 738-741.
  • Scherer-Dickson, N. (2004). Current developments of metacognitive concepts and their clinical implications: Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for depression. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17(2), 223-234.
  • Sladek, M. R., Doane, L. D., Luecken, L. J., & Eisenberg, N. (2016). Perceived stress, coping, and cortisol reactivity in daily life: A study of adolescents during the first year of college. Biological psychology 117, 8-15.
  • Smith, G. D., & Yang, F. (2017). Stress, resilience and psychological well-being in Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 49, 90-95. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Tosun, A., & Irak, M. (2008). Üst-Biliş-Ölçeği Türkçe uyarlaması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(1), 67-80.
  • Vesell, L., Waller, K., Dowden, J., & Fotso, J. C. (2015). Psychosocial support and resilience building among health workers in Sierra Leone: interrelations between coping skills, stress levels and interpersonal relationships. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), S3.
  • Visu‐Petra, L., Miclea, M., & Visu‐Petra, G. (2013). Individual differences in anxiety and executive functioning: A multidimensional view. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 649-659.
  • Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 301-320.
  • Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Wiley.
  • Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy: Cognition applied to regulating cognition. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(6), 651-658.
  • Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ 30. Behaioral Research and Theory, 42(4), 385-396.
  • Wu, Y., Yu, W., Wu, X., Wan, H., Wang, Y., & Lu, G. (2020). Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students: A crosssectional study. BMC Psychology, 8, Article 79.
  • Yi, F., Li, X., Song, X., & Zhu, L. (2020). The underlying mechanisms of psychological resilience on emotional experience: Attention-bias or emotion disengagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1993.