Kendiliknesnesi İhtiyaçları Envanterinin Türk toplumundaki psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Bu çalışmada, narsistik bozukluklarda gözlenen kendiliknesnesi aktarımlarının anlaşılması amacı ile geliştirilen Kendiliknesnesi İhtiyaçları Envanteri’nin (KİE) Türk toplumundaki psikometrik özelliklerinin incelemesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, iki farklı örneklem grubu ile yürütülmüştür. Ortalama yaşı 38.9 (SS = 6.32) olan 391 kişiden (305 kadın, 86 erkek) oluşan ilk örneklem ile Temel Bileşenler Analizi ve güvenirlik çalışması, ortalama yaşı 29.9 (SS = 10.65) olan 104 kişiden (76 kadın, 28 erkek) oluşan ikinci örneklem ile ise ölçüt geçerliği çalışması yürütülmüştür. Temel Bileşenler Analizi sonucu ortaya çıkan üç faktörlü yapı, “aynalanma/idealizasyon/ikizlik ihtiyacına yaklaşma”, “idealizasyon/ikizlik ihtiyacından kaçınma” ve “aynalanmadan kaçınma” olarak adlandırılmıştır. Bu faktörlerin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları sırasıyla .84, .79 ve .65; madde-toplam test puanı korelasyon katsayıları ise .25 ile .60 arasında bulunmuştur. Ölçüt geçerliği analizleri için faktörlerin Kişilerarası İlişki Boyutları Ölçeği (KİBÖ) ve Temel Kişilik Özellikleri Ölçeği (TKÖÖ) boyutları arasındaki ilişkisi incelenmiştir.

Investigating psychometric properties of Selfobject Needs Inventory in Turkish society

Selfobject Needs Inventory (SONI) is a scale developed to measure the orientation of an adult toward selfobject needs. The aim of this study was to investigate psychometric properties of SONI in Turkish society. The research was carried out on two samples. Principal Component Analysis and reliability analysis were performed on 391 subjects (305 women and 86 men) with the average age of participants as 38.9 years (SD = 6.32). Criterion- related validity indicators were investigated on 104 subjects (76 women and 28 men) with the average age of participants as 29.91 years (SD = 10.65). Principal Component Analysis results revealed 3-factor structure and factors were named as “approach orientation toward mirroring, idealization/twinship”, “avoidance orientation from idealization/twinship” and “avoidance orientation from mirroring”. Cronbach’s alphas for the factors were found as .84, .79, and .65, respectively; and item-total correlation coefficients ranged between .25 and .60. The relationships between SONI subscales, subscales of Scale of Dimensions of Interpersonal Relationships (SDIR) and subscales of Basic Personality Traits Inventory (BPTI) were used for concurrent validity.

___

  • Allen, K. D. (2011). Selfobject needs, homophobia, heterosexism among gay men during emerging adulthood, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi).Walden University, USA.
  • Banai, E., Mikulincer ve M., Shaver, P. R. (2005). “Selfobject” needs in Kohut’s Self Psychology, Links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation, and adjustment, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(2), 224-260.
  • Bardone-Cone, A. M., Lin, S. L. ve Butler, R. M. (2017) Perfectionism and contingent self-worth in relation to disordered eating and anxiety, Behavior Therapy, 48(3), 380-390.
  • Brewer-Johnson, A. M. (2005). A qualitative method to evaluate sense of self and self object experiences in mothers of children with autism, Alliant International University, San Diego, Calif, USA.
  • Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: An introduction. Standard Ed. Vol. 14, 67-102. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Gençöz, T. ve Öncül, Ö. (2012). Examination of personality characteristics in a Turkish sample: development of basic personality traits inventory, The Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 194-216.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing, but distinct and complementary, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
  • İmamoğlu-Erden ve S., Aydın, B. (2009). Kişilerarası İlişki Boyutları Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Psikoloji Çalışmaları Dergisi, 29(1), 39-64.
  • Kins, E., Beyers, W. ve Soenens, B. (2012). When the separation-individuation process goes awry, distinguishing between dysfunctional dependence and dysfunctional independence, International Journal of Behavioral Develeopment, 37, 1-12.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1990). Family and socialization in crosscultural perspective: A model of change. In J. Berman (Ed.) Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on motivation, 1989 (pp. 135-200). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Karaırmak, Ö., Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. ve Şirin, Ş. (2014). Dengeli bütünleşme-ayrışma ölçeğinin psikometrik özellikleri: Ergenlerde geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması, Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(22), 237-257.
  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press,
  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? USA: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lee, R. M. ve Robbins, S.B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 232-241.
  • Lopez, F. G., Siffert, K. J., Thorne, B., Schoenecker, S., Castleberry, E. ve Chaliman, R. (2013). Probing the relationship between selfobject needs and adult attachment orientations, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 247-263.
  • Mahler, M. S. (1971). A study of separation-individuation process, The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 403-424.
  • Marmarosh, C. L. ve Mann, S. (2014). Patients’ selfobject needs in psychodynamic psychotherapy: How they relate to client attachment, symptoms, and the therapy alliance, Psychoanalytic Psychology, 3 (3), 297-313.
  • Mattanah, J. F., Hancock, G. R. ve Brand, B. L. (2004). Parental Attachment, Separation-Individuation, and College Student Adjustment: A Structural Equation Analysis of Mediational Effects, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 213-225.
  • McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality. A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 330-361.
  • McCrae, R. R. ve John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five factor theory perspective, NewYork: The Guilford Press.
  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P. T., (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. O.P. John, R.W. Robbins, L.A.Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theoryand Research (3rd ed.,pp.159-181) içinde. NewYork: The Guilford Press.
  • Ornstein, P. (2008). Heinz Kohut’s self psychology -and ours- Transformations of Psychoanalysis, Internati-onal Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 3(2), 195-214.
  • Piotrowski, M. (2018). Selfobject experience in long-term friendships of midlife women, Psychoanalytic So-cial Work, 25(1), 17-41.
  • Robbins, S. B. ve Patton, M. J. (1985). Self-psychology and career development: Construction of the supe-riority and goal instability scales. Journal of Coun-seling Psychology, 32, 221-231.