13; anormal) iki alt gruba ayrıldı ve istatistiksel farklılıklar araştırıldı.Bulgular: Reflü Semptom İndeksi alt grupları çürük diş sayısı hariç tüm intraoral parametrelerde anlamlı farklılık gösterdi (p0.05). Sonuç: Gastroözofageal reflü ve larengofaringeal reflülü hastaların dental ve periodontal durum sonuçları bildirilmeden önce hasta tarafından beyan edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılması gerekir. Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux are common public health problems, which are known to effect oral cavity. Subjective assessment of symptom severity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux can be made with self-reported “Reflux Symptom Index”. In this study, possible relation of dental and periodontal conditions with Reflux Symptom Index scores was evaluated. Material and Methods: This study was performed with 135 dental outpatients (52 female and 83 male; aged between 18-63 years). Demographic and clinical variables were procured and Reflux Symptom Index (a nine item and 45-point scale questionnaire) scores were evaluated. Dental and periodontal conditions were assessed with DMFT (decayed, missing, filled teeth) index and Community Periodontal Index scores. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to their RSI values (Reflux Symptom Index ≤13; normal and Reflux Symptom Index >13; abnormal) and differences were statistically investigated. Results: Reflux Symptom Index subgroups showed significant difference in all intraoral parameters except decayed teeth number (p0.05).Conclusion: Self-reported Reflux Symptom Index merits further investigation before declaring dental and periodontal conclusions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux. "> [PDF] Dental/Periodontal Durum ve Hasta Tarafından Beyan Edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi Skorları Arasındaki Olası İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi. Bir Pilot Çalışma | [PDF] ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL/ PERIODONTAL CONDITIONS AND SELF-REPORTED REFLUX SYMPTOM INDEX SCORES. A PRELIMINARY STUDY 13; anormal) iki alt gruba ayrıldı ve istatistiksel farklılıklar araştırıldı.Bulgular: Reflü Semptom İndeksi alt grupları çürük diş sayısı hariç tüm intraoral parametrelerde anlamlı farklılık gösterdi (p0.05). Sonuç: Gastroözofageal reflü ve larengofaringeal reflülü hastaların dental ve periodontal durum sonuçları bildirilmeden önce hasta tarafından beyan edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılması gerekir. "> 13; anormal) iki alt gruba ayrıldı ve istatistiksel farklılıklar araştırıldı.Bulgular: Reflü Semptom İndeksi alt grupları çürük diş sayısı hariç tüm intraoral parametrelerde anlamlı farklılık gösterdi (p0.05). Sonuç: Gastroözofageal reflü ve larengofaringeal reflülü hastaların dental ve periodontal durum sonuçları bildirilmeden önce hasta tarafından beyan edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılması gerekir. Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux are common public health problems, which are known to effect oral cavity. Subjective assessment of symptom severity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux can be made with self-reported “Reflux Symptom Index”. In this study, possible relation of dental and periodontal conditions with Reflux Symptom Index scores was evaluated. Material and Methods: This study was performed with 135 dental outpatients (52 female and 83 male; aged between 18-63 years). Demographic and clinical variables were procured and Reflux Symptom Index (a nine item and 45-point scale questionnaire) scores were evaluated. Dental and periodontal conditions were assessed with DMFT (decayed, missing, filled teeth) index and Community Periodontal Index scores. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to their RSI values (Reflux Symptom Index ≤13; normal and Reflux Symptom Index >13; abnormal) and differences were statistically investigated. Results: Reflux Symptom Index subgroups showed significant difference in all intraoral parameters except decayed teeth number (p0.05).Conclusion: Self-reported Reflux Symptom Index merits further investigation before declaring dental and periodontal conclusions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux. ">

Dental/Periodontal Durum ve Hasta Tarafından Beyan Edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi Skorları Arasındaki Olası İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi. Bir Pilot Çalışma

Amaç: Oral kaviteyi etkilediği bilinen gastroözofageal reflü hastalığı ve larengofarengeal reflü genel toplum sağlığı problemidir. Gastroözofageal reflü ve larengofaringeal reflü hastalarında semptom şiddetinin subjektif olarak değerlendirilmesi hasta tarafından beyan edilen "Reflü Semptom İndeksi" ile yapılabilir. Bu çalışmada, dental ve periodontal durumların Reflü Semptom İndeksi skorları ile olası ilişkisi değerlendirildi.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, ayakta tedavi gören 135 hasta (52 kadın 83 erkek, yaşları 18-63 yıl) ile gerçekleştirildi. Demografik ve klinik değişkenler alındı ve Reflü Semptom İndeksi (dokuz madde ve 45 puanlı anket) skorları değerlendirildi. Dental ve periodontal durumlar DMFT (çürükkayıp-dolgulu diş) indeksi ve Toplum Periodontal İndeks skorları ile değerlendirildi. Hastalar Reflü Semptom İndeksi değerlerine göre (Reflü Semptom İndeksi ≤ 13, normal ve Reflü Semptom İndeksi >13; anormal) iki alt gruba ayrıldı ve istatistiksel farklılıklar araştırıldı.Bulgular: Reflü Semptom İndeksi alt grupları çürük diş sayısı hariç tüm intraoral parametrelerde anlamlı farklılık gösterdi (p0.05). Sonuç: Gastroözofageal reflü ve larengofaringeal reflülü hastaların dental ve periodontal durum sonuçları bildirilmeden önce hasta tarafından beyan edilmiş Reflü Semptom İndeksi hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılması gerekir.

ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL/ PERIODONTAL CONDITIONS AND SELF-REPORTED REFLUX SYMPTOM INDEX SCORES. A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux are common public health problems, which are known to effect oral cavity. Subjective assessment of symptom severity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux can be made with self-reported “Reflux Symptom Index”. In this study, possible relation of dental and periodontal conditions with Reflux Symptom Index scores was evaluated. Material and Methods: This study was performed with 135 dental outpatients (52 female and 83 male; aged between 18-63 years). Demographic and clinical variables were procured and Reflux Symptom Index (a nine item and 45-point scale questionnaire) scores were evaluated. Dental and periodontal conditions were assessed with DMFT (decayed, missing, filled teeth) index and Community Periodontal Index scores. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to their RSI values (Reflux Symptom Index ≤13; normal and Reflux Symptom Index >13; abnormal) and differences were statistically investigated. Results: Reflux Symptom Index subgroups showed significant difference in all intraoral parameters except decayed teeth number (p0.05).Conclusion: Self-reported Reflux Symptom Index merits further investigation before declaring dental and periodontal conclusions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux.

___

  • Mosca F, Rossillo V, Leone CA. Manifestations of gastro-pharyngo-laryngeal reflux disease. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006; 26(5): 247-51.
  • Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(8): 1900-20.
  • DeVault KR. Extraesophageal symptoms of GERD. Cleve Clin J Med. 2003; 70(5): 20-32.
  • Richter JE. Review article: extraoesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 22(1): 70-80.
  • Napierkowski J, Wong RK. Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Am J Med Sci. 2003; 326(5): 285-99.
  • Di Fede O, Di Liberto C, Occhipinti G, et al. Oral manifestations in patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease: a single-center casecontrol study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008; 37(6): 336-40.
  • Ersin NK, Oncag O, Tumgor G, Aydogdu S, Hilmioglu S. Oral and dental manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: a preliminary study. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28(3): 279-84.
  • Muñoz JV, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, et al. Dental and periodontal lesions in patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2003; 35(7): 461-7.
  • Linnett V, Seow WK, Connor F, Shepherd R. Oral health of children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a controlled study. Aust Dent J. 2002; 47(2):156-62.
  • Marsicano JA, de Moura-Grec PG, Bonato RC, Sales-Peres Mde C, Sales-Peres A, Sales-Peres SH. Gastroesophageal reflux, dental erosion, and halitosis in epidemiological surveys: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 25(2):135-41.
  • Corrêa MC, Lerco MM, Cunha Mde L, Henry MA. Salivary parameters and teeth erosions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arq Gastroenterol. 2012; 49(3): 214-8.
  • Yoshikawa H, Furuta K, Ueno M, et al. Oral symptoms including dental erosion in gastroesophageal reflux disease are associated with decreased salivary flow volume and swallowing function. J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47(4): 412-20.
  • Filipi K, Halackova Z, Filipi V. Oral health status, salivary factors and microbial analysis in patients with active gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Int Dent J. 2011; 61(4): 231-7.
  • Wang GR, Zhang H, Wang ZG, Jiang GS, Guo CH. Relationship between dental erosion and respiratory symptoms in patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease. J Dent. 2010; 38(11): 892-8.
  • Song JY, Kim HH, Cho EJ, Kim TY. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic periodontitis. Gut Liver. 2014; 8(1): 35-40.
  • Silva MA, Damante JH, Stipp AC, Tolentino MM, Carlotto PR, Fleury RN. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: New oral findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91(3): 301-10.
  • Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Symptom Index. J Voice. 2002; 16(2): 274-7.
  • Zucato B, Behlau MS. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms Index: Relation with the Main Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux, Voice Usage Level and Voice Screening. Rev Cefac. 2012; 14(6): 1197-1203.
  • Habermann W, Schmid C, Neumann K, Devaney T, Hammer HF. Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice. J Voice. 2012; 26(3): 123-7.
  • Naiboglu B, Durmus R, Tek A, Toros SZ, Egeli E. Do the laryngopharyngeal symptoms and signs ameliorate by empiric treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux? Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011; 38(5): 622-7.
  • Ramzy I, El Shazly M, Marzaban R, Elbaz T, Safwat M, Latif B. Laryngopharengeal Reflux in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Does “Silent Laryngopharengeal Reflux” Really Exist? Open Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014; 4(3): 130-40.
  • Park KH, Choi SM, Kwon SU, Yoon SW, Kim SU. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134(1):81-5.
  • World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods. 4th ed. UK: World Health Organization; 1997.
  • Ogut F, Ersin S, Engin EZ, et al. The effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on laryngeal findings and voice quality. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(4): 549-54.
  • Korkmaz M, Tarhan E, Unal H, Selcuk H, Yilmaz U, Ozluoglu L. Esophageal mucosal sensitivity: possible links with clinical presentations in patients with erosive esophagitis and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Dig Dis Sci. 2007; 52(2): 451-6.
  • Hayat E, Börekci S, Gemicioglu B. Reflux, Allergic Rhinitis, and Sleep Disorders with Asthma Control and Quality of Life. J Clin Anal Med. 2014; 5(6): 453-6.
  • Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms improve before changes in physical findings. Laryngoscope. 2011; 111(6): 979-81.
  • Catania RA, Kavic SM, Roth JS, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication effectively relieves symptoms in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11(12): 1579-87.
  • Pizzo G, Guiglia R, Lo Russo L, Campisi G. Dentistry and internal medicine: from the focal infection theory to the periodontal medicine concept. Eur J Intern Med. 2010; 21(6): 496502.
  • Logan RM. Links between oral and gastrointestinal health. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010; 4(1): 31-5.
  • Daley TD, Armstrong JE. Oral manifestations of gastrointestinal diseases. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007; 21(4): 241-4.
  • Nouraie M, Radmard AR, Zaer-Rezaii H, Razjouyan H, Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Malekzadeh R. Hygiene could affect GERD prevalence independently: a population-based study in Tehran. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(7): 1353-60.
  • Katunarić M, Jukić S, Staudt-Skaljac G, Mehulić K, Komar D. Some periodontological parameters in patients with oesophagogastric passage insufficiency. Coll Antropol. 1998; 22: 199-203.
  • Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(8): 1313-7.
  • Lien HC, Wang CC, Hsu JY, et al. Classical reflux symptoms, hiatus hernia and overweight independently predict pharyngeal acid exposure in patients with suspected reflux laryngitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 33(1): 89-98.
  • Mesallam TA, Stemple JC, Sobeih TM, Elluru RG. Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007; 116(6): 436-40.
  • Belafsky PC, Rees CJ. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: the value of otolaryngology examination. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008; 10(3): 278-82.
  • Holde GE, Oscarson N, Trovik TA, Tillberg A, Jönsson B. Periodontitis Prevalence and Severity in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Norwegian Circumpolar Communities. J Periodontol. 2017; 3: 1-17.
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-9645
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1999
  • Yayıncı: KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ KÜTÜPHANE VE DOKÜMANTASYON BAŞKANLIĞI
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ASSESSMENT OF THE POSSIBLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DENTAL/ PERIODONTAL CONDITIONS AND SELF-REPORTED REFLUX SYMPTOM INDEX SCORES. A PRELIMINARY STUDY

HÜSEYİN GENCAY KEÇELİ, HASAN HATİPOĞLU, Faik YAYLAK, Hümeyra Aydemir TURKAL

TİP 2 DİYABETLİ HASTALARIN SAĞLIK İNANCI, HASTALIK TUTUMLARI VE METABOLİK KONTROLÜNÜN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Selin YAĞCI, ELANUR YILMAZ KARABULUTLU

DENEYSEL TESTİS TORSİYONU SONRASI İSKEMİ/REPERFÜSYON HASARINDA İLOPROST VE DÜŞÜK DOZ METOTREKSAT’IN KORUYUCU ETKİSİ

Ercan YUVANÇ, Devrim TUĞLU, Üçler KISA, Önder BOZDOĞAN, Ertan BATİSLAM, Erdal YILMAZ

AMYAND HERNİLERDE APENDEKTOMİ İLE EŞZAMANLI FITIK ONARIMINDA GREFT KULLANIMI GÜVENLİ MİDİR?

İBRAHİM TAYFUN ŞAHİNER, MURAT KENDİRCİ

KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ HASTANESİ İÇİN YATAN HASTA MEMNUNİYETİ: BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

FUNDA ERDUGAN, SERAP YÖRÜBULUT

DENEYSEL TESTİS TORSİYONU SONRASI İSKEMİ/REPERFÜZYON HASARINDA İLOPROST VE DÜŞÜK DOZ METOTREKSAT’IN KORUYUCU ETKİSİ

ERCAN YUVANÇ, DEVRİM TUĞLU, ÜÇLER KISA, Önder BOZDOĞAN, Ertan BATİSLAM, Erdal YILMAZ

MYOMETRİUM LOKALİZASYONLU RAHİM İÇİ ARAÇ

CEMİLE DAYANGAN SAYAN, ZEHRA SEMA ÖZKAN, GÜLÇİN AYDIN, Funda ERDOĞAN, Zeynep İSLAMBAY

YÜKSEK DOZ SERTRALİN ALIMINA BAĞLI GELİŞEN SEROTONİN SENDROMU

GÜLÇİN AYDIN, IŞIN GENÇAY, SELİM ÇOLAK

HEMŞİRELİK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN AĞIZ DİŞ SAĞLIĞI ALGILARININ BELİRLENMESİ

HÜSNA ÖZVEREN, EMEL GÜLNAR, DİLEK ÖZDEN

POSTPARTUM DEPRESYONUN BEBEKLE İLİŞKİLİ RİSK FAKTÖRLERİ

NAZAN KARAHAN, Nimet Sevgi GENÇALP, FADİME BİNGÖL, REYHAN AYDIN, ALİ RAMAZAN BENLİ