Is Metaphysics a Feasible Philosophical Option?

Öz Before attempting to answer our primary question “is metaphysics a feasible philosophical option?”, I believe that it is necessary to explain and to discuss what the nature of philosophy is, and how it differs from science because my assumption that metaphysics is a feasible philosophical option will get its meaning by showing that metaphysics differs from science as well as philosophy differs from science; furthermore, it would be shown that metaphysics differs from the other options of philosophy. Therefore, in this paper, three concepts will be examined and compared with each other: Philosophy, science, and metaphysics.

___

ARISTOTLE. (1941) Metaphysics: The Basic Works of Aristotle. Edited and with an introduction by Richard McKeon, New York: Random House.

AYER, A. J. (1959) Logical Positivism. Illonois: The Free Press.

BECK, J. ( 1905) The Metaphysics of Descartes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Blackwell.

FRANKFURT, Heny J. ( 1992) Essay on Modern Philosophers. Edited by Vere Ckappell, New York: Gorland Publication Inc.

HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1962) Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Rabinson. Harper & Row, New York.

HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1962) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, translated by James Churchill. Bloomington: University Press, Indiana.

HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1977) “What is Metaphysics”, Basic Writings. New York: Harper & Row. Türkçeye çeviren Yusuf Örnek. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 1991 ve 1994.

HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1959) An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. by Ralph Manheim. New Haven and Yale University Press, London.

HEIDEGGER, Martin, (1981) Aristotle, Metaphysics, Frankfurt, Klostermann.

HAMFLING, Oswald (Editor) (1981) Essential Readings in Logical Positivism. Oxford: Basil

PLANCK, Max, (1931) The Universe in the Light of Modern Physics, George Allen And Unwin Limited. London.