Bazı odun kabuk ekstraktları arasında karşılaştırma: Anti-fungal aktivite olarak

Özet Çalışmanın amacı: Çevre dostu ve doğada çözünebilen odun koruma maddelerine olan ihtiyaç son yıllarda artmıştır. Bu çalışmada, ağaç kabuklarının antifungal etkileri incelenmiştir.Çalışma alanı: Sahil çamı (Pinus pinaster L.), demir (Casuarina equisetifolia L.), mimoza (Acacia mollissima L.) kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.), ve göknar (Abies nordmanniana) ağaç kabukları kullanılmıştır.Materyal ve Yöntem: TAPPI standardına göre alkol-benzen ekstraksiyonu sonucu elde edilen ekstrakların iki farklı konsantrasyonu hazırlanmıştır. Kabuk ekstraklarının etkinliği esmer çürüklük mantarı Coniophera puteana, ve beyaz çürüklük mantarı; Trametes versicolor’a karşı değerlendirilmiştir.Sonuçlar: Sahil çamı ve göknar ağaç kabuk ekstraktları T. Versicolor mantarına karşı, C. puteana mantarından daha fazla dayanım göstermiştir. Bunun aksine demir ve mimoza ağaç kabuk ekstraktları esmer çürüklük mantarı C. puteana mantarına karşı daha dayanıklıdır. Mantar aktivitesinin engellenmesinde konsantrasyon en önemli faktördür. Mantar gelişiminin durdurulması konsantrasyona paralel bir şekilde artmıştır. Araştırma vurguları: Doğal fenolik bileşikler bakımından zengin olan kabuk ekstraktlarının mantar aktivitesini engellediği düşünülmektedir. Ağaç kabuklarının odun koruma maddesi olarak kullanılabilme potansiyeline sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity

AbstractAim of study: The need for eco-friendly and bio-soluble wood preservatives has increased recently. In this study, antifungal effects of tree barks were researched. Area of study: The maritime (Pinus pinaster L.), iron (Casuarina equisetifolia L.), mimosa (Acacia mollissima L.), calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.), and fir (Abies nordmanniana) tree barks were used.Material and Methods: The the solution at two concentrations was prepared to the substance obtained with alcohol benzene extraction method from the tree bark according to TAPPI standard. The effectiveness of bark extracts was evaluated against brown-rot fungus; Coniophera puteana, and white-rot fungus; Trametes versicolor. Main results: This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives. Maritime pine and fir tree barks showed good resistance against T. versicolor more than C. puteana. On the contrary, iron and mimosa tree barks were more resistance against brown-rot fungus, C. puteana. Concentration is the most important factor for inhibition of fungal activity. Inhibition of fungal growth increased parallel with concentration. Research highlights: It is thought that the rich structure of the bark extract in terms of natural phenolic compounds could inhibit fungal activity. This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives. 

___

  • Fradinho D.M., Neto C.P., Evtuguin D., Jorge F.C., Irle M.A., Gil M.H., Jesus J.P. 2002. Chemical characterization of bark and of alkaline bark extracts from maritime pine grown in Portugal. Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 23-32.
  • Gao H., Shupe T.F., Eberhardt L., Hse C.Y. 2007. Antioxidant activity of extracts from the wood and bark of Port Orford cedar. J. Wood Sci, 53, 147-152.
  • Hamburger M., Hostettmann K. 1991. Bioactivity in plants: The link between phytochemistry and medicine. Phytochemistry, 30, 3864-3874.
  • Harun J., Labosky P. 1985. Antitermitic and antifungal properties of selected bark extractives. Wood and Fiber Science, 17 (3), 327-335.
  • Jerez M., Selga A., Sineiro J., Torres J.L., Nùnez M.J. 2007. A comparison between bark extracts from Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiate: Antioxidant activity and procyanidin composition. Food Chemistry, 100, 439-444.
  • Jiang G.G., Fang G.Z, Li L.L., Shi Z.X., Zhang Z.R. 2014. Study on antioxidant activity of catalyzed hydrogen degradation product of polymeric proanthocyanidins (LPPC) from Larixgmelinii bark. BioResources, 9 (1), 662-672.
  • Kartal S.N., Hwang W.J., Imamura Y., Sekine Y. 2006. Effect of essential oil compounds and plant extracts on decay and termite resistance of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64 (6), 61-455
  • Kirker G.T., Blodgett A.B., Arango R.A., Lebow P.K., Clausen C.A. 2013. The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 82, 53-58.
  • Kocaefe D., Saha S. 2012. Comparison of the protection effectiveness of acrylic polyurethane coatings containing bark extracts on three heat-treated North American wood species: Surface degradation. Applied Surface Science, 258, 5283-5290.
  • Maoz M., Weitz I., Blumenfeil M., Freitag C., Morrell J.J. 2007. Antifungal activity of plant derived extracts against G. trabeum. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting, IRG/WP 07-30433, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mohan D., Shi J., Nicholas D.D., Pittman C.U., Steele PH., Cooper J.E. 2008. Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere, 71 (3), 65-456.
  • Mourant D., Yang D.Q., Lu X., Roy C. 2005. Anti-fungal properties of the pyroligneus liquors from the pyrolysis of softwood bark. Wood Fiber and Technology, 37 (3), 542-548.
  • Nemli G., Gezer E.D., Yıldız S., Temiz A., Aydın A. 2006. Evaluation of mechanical, physical properties and decay resistance of particleboard made from particles impregnation with Pinusbrutia bark extractives. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2059-2064.
  • Onuorah E.O. 2000. The wood preservative potentials of heartwood extracts of Milicia excelsa and Erythrophleum suaveolens. Bioresource Technology, 75 (2), 3-171.
  • Özgenç Ö., Durmaz S., Kuştaş S., Erişir E. 2016. The determination of antifungal specialties on some tree bark extracts. Journal of Advanced Technology Sciences, 5 (1), 147-152.
  • Panshin A.J., DeZeeuw C. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. ISBN: 0070484414, 722 s, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
  • Saha S., Kocaefe D., Boluk Y., Pichette A. 2011. Enhancing exterior durability of jack pine by photo-stabilization of acrylic polyurethane coating using bark extract. Part 1: Effect of UV on color change and ATR-FT-IR analysis. Progress in Organic Coatings, 70, 376-382.
  • Salem M., Abdel-Megeed A., Ali H.M. 2014. Stem wood and bark extracts of Delonixregia (Boj. Ex. Hook): Chemical analysis and antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. BioResources, 9 (2), 2382-2395.
  • Satish S., Mohana D.C., Ranhavendra M.P., Raveesha K.A. 2007. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against important seed borne pathogens of Aspergillus sp. An International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 3 (1), 109-119.
  • Singh T., Singh A.P. 2012. A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Sci. Technol, 46, 851-870.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Sen S., Akcay C., 2013. Antifungal properties of some plant extracts used as wood preservatives. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 85, 23-28.
  • Tascioglu C., Yalcin M., Troya T., Sivrikaya H., 2012. Termiticidal properties of some wood and bark extracts used as wood preservatives. BioResources, 7 (3), 2960-2969.
  • Taylor A.M., Gartner, B.L., Morrell, J.J. 2002. Heartwood formation and natural durability: A review. Wood and Fibre Science, 34 (4), 587-611.
  • Vázquez G., Fontenla E., Santos J., Freire M.S., González-Álvarez J., Antorrena G. 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 28, 279-285.
  • Vázquez G., González-Álvarez J., Santos J., Freire M.S., Antorrena G. 2009. Evaluation of potential applications for chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products, 29, 364-370.
  • Yang DQ. 2009. Potential utilization of plant and fungal extracts for wood protection. Forest Prod J., 59 (4), 97-103.
  • Wang S.Y., Wu J.H., Cheng S.S., Lo C.P., Chang H.N., Shyur L.F., Chang S.T. 2004. Antioxidant activity of extracts from Calocedrusformosana leaf, bark, and heartwood. J. Wood Sci., 50, 422-426.
Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-2399
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Kastamonu Üniversitesi