Vısıons And Applıcatıons Of Admınıstratıons Of Schools Of Foreıgn Languages On Technology Plannıng

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki yedi farklı üniversitenin Yabancı Diller Yüksekokullarında son bir yıl içerisinde görev yapmış ve halen yapmakta olan yöneticilerin görüşleri doğrultusunda, söz konusu okulların teknoloji planlama vizyonlarını ve bu doğrultudaki uygulamaları ilgili alanyazındaki gelişmeler doğrultusunda incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, ilgili alanyazın incelenerek, araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen bir anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, genel olarak, veri toplanan okulların henüz teknoloji planlaması konusunda kuramsal ve uygulama bağlamlarında alanyazında belirtilen nitelikleri geliştirmemiş oldukları görülmüştür. Diğer taraftan, devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinin teknoloji planlaması, teknoloji ile ilgili sistem, araç ve mesleki gelişim etkinlikleri bağlamlarında belirgin bir ayrım içerisinde oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır. Vakıf üniversiteleri yenilikçi uygulama ve eğilimleri giderek daha etkin bir şekilde takip ederken, devlet üniversitelerinin teknoloji planlama vizyonlarını geliştirmede bütçe, personel ve bürokrasi noktalarında ciddi problemleri bulunmaktadır. Hemen tüm yüksekokulların teknoloji planlaması ve entegrasyonu ile ilgili yaşadıkları problemlerin temelinde yapılandırılmış bir karar alma mekanizmalarının olmaması ve teknoloji uzmanlığı noktasında yeterli personel ve bilgi desteğinden yoksun olmaları yatmaktadır.

Yabancı Diller Yüksek Okulları Yönetimlerinin Teknoloji Planlamasına Dönük Görüş Ve Uygulamaları

The aim of this paper is to unfold the perspectives of the administrators currently working or have recently given up their posts in the schools of foreign languages in seven Turkish Universities on technology planning and integration. The data were gathered via a questionnaire. In general, the results of the study revealed that none of the schools of which data were gathered has precisely been planning technology as defined in the relevant literature. Besides, there is a significant gap between the state and foundation universities’ visions and applications on the planning and integration of technology and professional development activities. While foundation universities gradually keep track of innovative applications and trends, state universities have fiscal, personnal, and bureaucratic problems to catch the technology train in order to plan their technology visions. One of the many problems nearly all of the participant institutions have with technology planning and integration is the lack of informed decisions and adequate guidance of technology expertise.

___

  • Hay, L. E., Educating the Net Generation - educational planning for technology-knowledgeable students, 2000. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JSD/is_4_57/ai_77204709/
  • Maxwell, D., Technology and Foreign Language Learning. A Report to the Charles E. Culpeper Foundation National Foreign Language Center. Washington DC, 1998. www.rbf. org/pdf/maxwellreport.pdf
  • See, J. Developing Effective Technology Plans. The Computing Teacher, Vol. 19, Number 8, May, 1992. www.nctp.com/john.see.html on March 10.
  • Bryom, E. Review of the Professional Literature on the Integration of Technology into Educational Programs, n.d. http://www.seirtec.org/publications/litreview.html
  • November, A., & Staudt, C. (with Costello, M.A., & Huske, L.). Developing a school or district technology plan (Rev. ed). Pathways to School Improvement, 1998. http://www. ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te300.htm
  • Cradler, J., Implementing technology in education:ecent findings from research and evalu ation studies, 1996. http://www.wested.org/techpolicy/recapproach.html
  • Regional Technology in Education Consortia, Guiding questions for technology planning, 1996. http://www.ncrtec.org/capacity/guidewww/gqhome.htm
  • Piele, P.K., The politics of technology utilization. In D.E. Mitchell & M.E. Goertz (Eds.), Educational politics for the new century: The twentieth anniversary yearbook of the Poli. tics of Education Association (pp. 93-106). London: Falmer Press, 1989.
  • North Central Regional Educational Laboratory & Illinois State Board of Education., Learning through technology: A planning and implementation guide, 1995. http://www. ncrel.org/tandl/homepg.htm
  • Northwest Educational Technology Consortium. Strategic Planning For Technology. n.d. http://www.netc.org/planning/planning/index.php
  • Dwyer, D. Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership. April, 1994. http://www.gmpdc.org/surveys/nhpdc_admin_eval.php17 Jan 2007
  • White C. T. Tips for Designing Online Professional Development. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction School Improvement Division Teacher Development Services Section, 2001. Retrieved from www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/schoolimprovement/development/ online/tips.ppt -
  • Professional Development Consultation Paper, Support for teaching and learning Questionnaire and Summary 20th April 2000 Consultation Teachers & Staffing, 2000. Retrieved from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/downloadableDocs/35_1.pdf on March 23
  • Bain, A. Secondary school reform and technology planning: Lessons learned from a ten year school reform initiative. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 149- 170. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/bain.html, 2004.
  • Education Technology Planning: A Guide for School Distric ts. The Commission on Technology in Learning, California State Board of Education. California, 2001. www.cde. ca.gov/re/pn/fd/documents/edtechplan.pdf
  • Krasne A. & Crabb, K. Good Advice on Technology Planning, 2005. Rerieved from http:// www.techsoup.org/learningcenter/techplan/page5077.cfm.
  • Diaz, D. P. Faculty and staff development taking technology to the classroom: Pedagogybased training for educators [Electronic Version]. The Technology Source Archives, 6, 2008. Retrieved Sept 8, 2009 from http://technologysource.org/article/taking_technology_ to_the_classroom/.
  • Sheingold, K. & Hadley, M., Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education, 1990.
Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-8811
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Halil İbrahim AKYÜZ