Eylem YILDIZ FEYZİOĞLU, Nilgün TATAR, Serkan BULDUR, Bülent AYDOĞDU

Öğretmenlerle Fen Programı Reformu Arasındaki Köprüyü Kurmak: Öğretmenlerin Hizmet Içi Eğitim Kursunun Etkileriyle İlgili Görüşleri

Bu araştırmanın amacı, fen öğretmenleri içi düzenlenen hizmet içi eğitim kursuna katılan öğretmenlerin kursun feni öğrenme ve fen öğretimiyle ilgili bilgilerine etkilerini belirlemek ve fen öğretim yöntemlerinin uygulanması sırasında karşılaşacakları sorunlarla ilgili görüşlerini sergilemektir. Çalışmaya 16 öğretmen katılmıştır. Çalışmada öğretmenlerin günlükleri veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Süre olarak kısa sürdüğü için öğretmenler üzerindeki etkileri sınırlı olmasına rağmen, kurs öğretmenlerin feni öğrenme fen öğretimiyle ilgili görüşlerine olumlu etkiler yapmıştır. Öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları içeriği yetiştirme, yetersiz malzeme, kalabalık sınıflar ve sınıf yönetimi gibi sorunlar, kursta bu yöntemlerle öğrendikleri

Bridging The Gap Between Teachers and Curriculum Reform: Teachers’ Opinions on The Effects of In-Service Training Course1

The aim of this study is to present teachers’ opinions on the effects of the course teachers’ knowledge related to science learning and teaching methods, and their opinions’ on the difficulties related with science teaching methods. The participants included 16 science teachers. The reflective journal was used as a database for the study. Despite the limitations of short-term effect to teachers, the course contributed to positive changes in teachers’ opinions about science learning and knowledge of science teaching methods. The improvement observed in teachers’ knowledge may trigger them to use the methods they learned in the course when they face with difficulties such as covering the content, insufficient science equipment, crowded classes, and classroom management problems

PDF

___

Aksit, N. (2007). Educational Reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129-137.
Alger, C. (2009). Secondary Teachers’ Conceptual Metaphors of Teaching and Learning: Changes over the Career Span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 743-751.
Anderson, RD. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13 (1), 1-12.
Asilsoy, Ö. (2007). Biyoloji öğretmenleri için proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı konulu bir hizmet içi eğitim kurs programı geliştirilmesi ve etkililiğinin araştırılması. Unpublished master’s thesis, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education Over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, S., Weiss, 1. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., Weis, A. M. (2013).
Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33 (8), 3-15.
Bransford, D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bürnen, N. T. (2009). Possible Effects of Professional Development on Turkish Teachers’ SelfEfl'ıcacy and Classroom Practice. Professional Development in Education, 35 (2), 261-278.
Cheung, D. (2007). Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-Based Laboratory Work.
Intemational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 107-130. Cimer, S. O., Çakır İ. ve Çimer, A. (2010). Teachers’ Views on the Effectiveness of In-Service Courses on the New Curriculum in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33 (1), 31-41.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. Morrison, K. (2000). Reserch methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge/Falmer.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the Essence of Inquiry: New Roles for Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (9), 916-937.
Çınar, S. (2011). Sımf öğretmenleri için fen-teknoloji-toplum (FTT) yaklaşımma yönelik bir hiz— met-içi eğitim kurs programı geliştirilmesi ve etkinliliğinin araştırılması. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from Three-Year Longitudinal Study.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 (2), 81-112. Doğan, Y. (2010). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Prograrnınm Uygulanması Sürecinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar.
Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (1), 86-106. Ekinci, A. ve Öter, Ö.M. (n.d.). İlköğretim okulları ders kitapları, öğrenci çalışma kitapları ve öğretmen kılavuz kitaplanmn branşlara göre incelenmesi çalıştayları raporu, http://duabpo.dicle.edu. tr/oygem/dosya/DERS_KiTAPLAR_iNCELEME_RAPORU.pdf(01. 10.201 1)
Elmas, R, Öztürk, N., Irmak, M., Cobern, W.-W. (2014). An investigation of teacher response to national science curriculum reforms in turkey Eurasian Journal ofPhysics anal Chemistry Education, (1 ), 2-33.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from national sample of teachers. American Educatio— nal Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945.
Güneş, T., Dilek, N. S., Hoplan, M., Çelikoğlu, M. ve Demir, E. S. (2010). Öğretmenlerin alternatif değerlendirme konusundaki görüşleri ve yaptıkları uygulamalar. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11-13 November, Antalya, Turkey.
Hurd, D. (1988). Scientific literacy: New minds for changing world. Science Education, 82, 407—416.
Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R., Karaca, F. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centered education: Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 350—356.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668-690.
Karadağ, E., Deniz, S., Korkmaz, T. ve Deniz, G. (2008). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı: Sınıf öğ- retmenleri görüşleri kapsamında bir. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakiiltesi Dergisi, 21 (2), 383-402.
Kozcu—Cakır, N., Şenler, B. ve Göçmen-Taşkın, B. (2007). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersirıe yöneliktutumlannrn belirlenmesi. Turk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, (4), 637-655.
Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P, Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal ofResearch in Science Te— aching, 41 (10), 1021-1043.
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: the impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers’. International Journal ofScience Education, 23 (5), 517-534.
Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B. (2013). Teachers’ transformation to inquiry-based instructional practice. Creative Education, (2), 132-142.
McMillan, J. H. Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88 (6), 970-983.
Öztürk, İ. H. (2011). Curriculum reform and teacher autonomy in turkey: The case of the history teaching. International Journal ofInstruction, 4(2), 1308-1470.
Park, S., Lee, S., Oliver, J. S., Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers‘ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 7, 37-64.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44 (4), 921-958.
Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: an analysis of teacher self-eflicacy beliefs and professional development model. Journal ofSci— ence Teacher Education, 13 (2), 189-220.
Reap, M. A. (2000). Master and novice science teachers’ understandings and use of the learning cycle. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma.
Roberts, M. R. (2010). Lesson study: professional development and its impact on science teacher self—efi‘icacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York.
Sandholtz, J. H. (2002). Inservice training or professional development: contrasting opportunities in school/university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 815—830.
Seung, E., Park, S., Narayan, R. (2011). Exploring elementary pre-service teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and learning as revealed in their metaphor writing. Journal ofScience Educa— tion and Technology, 20(6), 703-714.
Şenel-Coruhlu, T., Er—Nas, S. ve Çepni, S. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenleri için altematif ölçme ve değerlendirme tekniklerine yönelik bir hizmet içi eğitim programından yansımalar: Trabzon örneği. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, (2), 1-22.
Şimşek, H., Hırça, H. ve Coşkun, S. (2012). İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmenlerinin öğretim yöntem ve tekniklerini tercih ve uygulama düzeyleri: Şanlıurfa ili. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (18), 249-268.
Tekbıyık, A. ve Akdeniz, A. R. (2008). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programını kabullenmeye ve uygulamaya yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi UVEF—EFMED), (2), 23-37.
Timperley, H. S., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and de— velopment: best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Tosa, S., Martin, F. (2010). Impact of professional development program using data-loggers on science teachers’ attitudes towards inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathema— tics and Science Teaching, 29, 303-332.
Wang, D. (2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, 157-164.
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Open University Press: Berkshire, England.
Wilson, S. M., Berne, J. (1999). Teacher leaming and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review ofResearch in Education, 24, 173-209.
Yilmaz, K. (2007). Leamer—centred instruction as means to realise democratic education: The problems and constraints confronting learner-centred instruction in Turkey. Studies in Learning, Evaluation Innovation and Development, (3), 1-28.
Zhu, X., Ennis, C. D., Chen, A. (2011). Implementation challenges for constructivist physical education curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16 (1), 83-99.