___

• Al Majali, Y.D.S. (2013). The Impact of (5Es) learning cycle on the outcome and the development of creative thinking among students of seventh grade in Arabic language course in Alqaser/ karak brigade. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 31-40.
• Atasoy, B. (2004). Teaching and Learning of Science Education [Fen Eğitiminde Öğretme ve Öğ- renme]. Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
• Aydın, N. & Yılmaz, A. (2010). The impact of constructivist approach to meta cognitive skills of students. [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın öğrencilerin üst düzey bilişsel becerilerine etkisi]. Hac- ettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 57-68.
• Aykaç, N. & Ulubey, O. (2012). Pre-service teachers' opinions about the application level of elemen- tary school program. [Öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretim proramının uygulanma düzeyine ilişkin görüşleri]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1), 63-82.
• Boddy, N., Watson, K. & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five E's: A referent model for construc- tivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 27-42. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1023606425452#page-1
• Brooks,J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The Case for The Constructivist Classroom. Newyork: ASCD.
• Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for the Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Bybee, R. W., Buchwald, C.E., Crissman, S., Heil, D. R., Kuerbis, P. J., Matsumoto, C. & Melner- ney, J.D. (1989). Science and Technology Education for The Elementary Years: Frameworks for Curriculum and Instruction. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, Boulder, Colorado. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314237.pdf
• Bybee, R. W. & Landes, N.M. (1990). Science for life & living: An elementary school science program from biological sciences curriculum study. The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92-98. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4449042?sid=21 106284130683&uid=4&uid=2
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A. & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorada: Springs BSCS. Retrieved from http://bscs.org/sites/default/files/_legacy/BSCS_5E_ Instructional_Model-Full_Report.pdfCarr, Malcolm, Barker, Miles, Bell, Beverly, Biddulph, Fred, Jones, Alister, Kirkwood, Valda
• Demir, S., Önen, F., & Şahin, F. (2012). Investigating science education pre-service teachers' level of self-efficacy towards using constructivist approach. [Fen Bilgisi öğretmen aday- larının yapılandırmacı yaklaşımı uygulamaya yönelik öz yeterlilik inanc düzeylerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma]. Paper presented at the Congress of 10th National Science and Mathematics Education, Turkey: Niğde. Retrieved from http://Kongre. Nigde.Edu.Tr/Xufbmek/Dosyalar/Tam_Metin/Pdf/2323-29_05_2012-16_43_44.Pdf
• Dikici, A., Türker, H.H. & Özdemir, G. (2010). The impact of 5e learning cycle to meaningful learning. Journal of Education Faculty of Cukurova University 39, 100-128.
• Doğanay, A. & Tok, S. (2007). Contemporary Approaches for Teaching. In A. Doğanay (Eds.), In Methods and Principle of Learning. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
• Driver, R. Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific know- ledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. Retrieved from http:// calteach.ucsc.edu/aboutus/documents/Driver-Constructionofscikn.pdf
• Er Nas, S., Çoruhlu, T. S. & Çepni, S. (2010). An assessment on the effectiveness of the mate- rial developed for the elaborate stage of the 5e model. Journal of Education Faculty of May 19 University,29 (1), 17-36. Retrieved from http://www.arastirmax.com/system/files/1066/ uvt_116622.pdf
• Ev, H. (2006). Active learning and approaches of measurement and assessment.Paper presented at the Symposium of Seeking New Paradigm in Turkish Education System (November 5-6), Turkey: Ankara.
• Fensham, P.J., Gunstone, R. & White, R. (1994). Science Content and Constructivist Views of Lear- ning and Teaching. In P.J. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), In the content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 147-160). London: The Falmer Press.
• Gelbal, S. & Kelecioğlu H. (2007). Teachers' proficiency perceptions of about the measurement and evaluation techniques and the problems they confront. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 135-145.
• Gökçe, E., İşcan Demirhan, C. & Erdem, A. (2012). The observation of teacher candidates on app- ropriate studies for constructive classroom. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching,1(1), 111-127. Retrieved from http://jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/12.gokce.pdf
• Gould, J.S. (2007). Dil becerilerinin öğrenimi ve öğretimine oluşturmacı bir perspektif. [A constructive perspective to learning and teaching of language skills]. In Fosnot, C.T. (Ed.), Durmuş, S. Translat- ed by Yapılandırmacılıkta Teori, Perspektifler ve Uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Yayın-Dağıtım.
• Gray, A. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning. SSTA Research Centre Report. Retrieved fromhttp://www.saskschoolboards.ca/old/ResearchAndDevelopment/ResearchRe- ports/Instruction/97-07.htm
• Karplus, R. (1980). Teaching for the development of reasoning. Research in Science Education, 10, 1-10. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02356303#page-1
• Kaya, N. (2013). The attitude of class teachers to constructivism and self-efficacy belief on con- structivist practices (Afyonkarahisar sample). [Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yapılandırmacılığa ilişkin tutumu ve yapılandırmacı uygulamalara ilişkin öz yeterlik inancı: Afyonkarahisar örneği]. (Un- published master thesis), Afyonkocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar.
• Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R. & Renner, J.W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills. National Association for Rese- arch in Science Teaching, College of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincin- nati, OH45221.Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED324204.pdf (ED 324204).
• Leinhardt, G. (1992). What research on learning tells us about teaching. Educational Leaders- hip, 49 (7), 20. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/ el_199204_leinhardt.pdf
• Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cor- win Press. Matthews, M.R. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism in science education. Science and Education, 6(1-2), 5-14.
• Metin, M. & Özmen, H. (2009). Difficulties of pre-service teachers in developing and implementing teaching activities based on 5e model in constructivist approach. [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşım- da 5e modeline dayalı etkinliklerin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanmasında öğretmen adaylarının karşılastığı zorluklar]. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Math- ematics Education 3(2), 94-123.
• Newby, D.E. (2004). Using inquiry to connect young learners to science. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nationalcharterschols.org/uploads/pdf/resource20040617125804us- ing%20Inguiry.pdf
• Öz, F. (2006). Practical with Turkish Teaching-Improved According to the New Curriculum. [Yeni Programa Göre Geliştirilmiş Uygulamalı Türkçe Öğretimi]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Pınar, M. A. (2013). The views of science and technology teachers toward classroom practices of constructivist approach (Diyarbakir sample). [Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın sınıf uygulamalarına ilişkin Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmenlerinin görüşleri: Diyarbakır örneği]. (Unpublished master thesis), Mus Alparslan University, Mus.
• Rainer, J., Guyton, E. & Bowen, C. (2000). Constructivist pedagogy in primary classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, USA: New Orleans, LA, (April 24-28). Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440760.pdf (ED 440 760).
• Richardson V. (1997). Constructivist Teacher Education. New York: Falmer Press.
• Savaşçı, F. & Berlin, F. D. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to cons- tructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education,23 (1), 65-86. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9262-z.
• Schunk, H.D. (2004). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspectives. (4th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Settlagh, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the appro- ach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43-50.
• Simpson, L. T. (2002). Dare I oppose constructivist theory?. The Educational Forum, 66, 633-662. doi: 10.1080/00131720208984854.
• Tanner, K. D. (2010). Order matters: Using the 5e model to align teaching with how pe- ople learn. CBE Life Science Education, 9(3),159-164. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-06-0082.
• Tsai, C.C. (1998). Science learning and constructivism. Curriculum and Teaching, 13,31-52.
• Ün Açıkgöz, K. (2005). Effective Teaching and Learning. [Etkili Öğretme ve Öğrenme]. İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası.
• Vermette, P., Foote, C., Bird, C., Mesibov, D., Harris-Ewing, S. & Battaglia, C. (2001). Understanding constructivism(s): a primer for parents and school board members. Education, 122(1), 87.
• Wilder, M. & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). 5E learning cycle lesson. Science Activities, 41 (1), 25-31. doi: 10.3200/SATS.41.4.37-43.
• Wilson, B.G. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.