Ali ERSOY, Bilal ÖNCÜL

Araştırma Yöntemleri Denizinde Yüzmek: Doktora Öğrencilerinin Erasmus Yoğun Program (IP) Deneyimleri

Yoğunlaştırılmış Erasmus Programı: Doktora Çalışmalarında Araştırma Yöntemleri, çeşitli ülkelerin enstitülerini temsil eden öğrenci ve öğretim elemanlarının katıldığı kısa süreli bir programdır. Programın temel amacı, katılımcı üniversitelerin doktora düzeyindeki araştırma deneyimlerini genişletmektir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, nitel araştırma hakkında uluslararası bir projeye katılan doktora öğrencilerinin bakış açılarını ortaya çıkarmaktır. İki haftalık proje süresince, katılımcılar kültürler arası etkileşim ve farklı danışmanlarla nitel araştırmaya ilişkin etkileşimde bulunmuşlardır. Bu araştırma fenomenoloji deseninde nitel bir araştırmadır. Uluslararası öğrenme fırsatı yaşamış 10 doktora öğrencisi ile yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik yaklaşım kullanılarak kodlanmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgulara dayalı olarak IP'nin katılımcıların bireysel ve araştırma yöntemleri bağlamında gelişimine olanak sağladığı, IP sürecinde bireysel sorumlulukların bulunduğu ve sürecin yüz yüze etkileşime olanak sağladığı sonuçları yer almaktadır. Benzer projelerin sayısının artırılması araştırmacı ve uygulayıcılar açısından önerilmektedir

Swimming in The Research Methodology: Doctoral Students' Erasmus IP Experiences

Erasmus Intensive Programme: Doctoral Studies in Research Methodologies is a shortterm study programme joining students and supervisors from various doctoral institutions representing the participants' countries. The main aim of the programme is to enhance the experience of doctoral studies across the participating universities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of PhD candidates who have engaged in an international doctoral project about qualitative methodology. During the two weeks project process, participants had carried out intercultural experiences and interactions about qualitative research methodological perspectives from different supervisors. This study utilized a qualitative, phenomenological design. 10 semi-structured interviews be conducted with students who engaged in international learning opportunities. The interviews be coded and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological approach. Based on the findings it was determined that IP allows participants to progress in the context of individual and research methods, there was individual responsibilities in IP process and the process allows to face to face interaction.Increasing the number of similar projects are recommended for researchers and practitioners

PDF

___

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research (Vol. 6). Sage.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). Growing and developing as a university researcher. Higher Education, 55(2), 241-254.
APEC (2010). Skills and competencies needed in the research field objectives 2020. http://www. eurocadres.org/IMG/pdf/APEC_EN_Skills_and_competencies_needed.pdf 02.02.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir. adresinden
Barrett, A. M., Crossley, M., & Dachi, H. A. (2011). International collaboration and research ca- pacity building: Learning from the EdQual experience. Comparative Education, 47(1), 25-43.
Beerkens, M., & Vossensteyn, H. (2011). The effect of the Erasmus Programme on European High- er Education. In Reform of Higher Education in Europe (pp. 45-62). Sense Publishers.
Bennett, M. J. (1998). Intercultural communication: A current perspective. Basic concepts of inter- cultural communication: Selected readings, s. 1-34.
Biasutti, M. (2014). An intensive programme on education for sustainable development: the partici- pants' experience. Environmental Education Research, (ahead-of-print), 1-19.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Educa- tion, 26(3), 271-285.
Bruce, C., Pham, B., & Stoodley, I. (2004). Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 219-238.
Chiang, K. H. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(1/2), 4-32.
Conrad, S., & Mauranen, A. (2003). The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. Tesol Quarterly, 37(3), 513-527.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Crystal, D. (1998). English as a global language. European Review-Chichester-, 6, 371-373.
Declaration, B. (1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education. European Union, Brussels. www. bologna-berlin2003. de/pdf/bolog- na_declaration. pdf adresinden 02.02.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2000). Doctoral students' access to research cultures-are some more unequal than others?. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-165.
Diana, P., Maddaloni, D., Melillo, L., & Moffa, G. (2015). Teaching migration studies through collaborative learning practices in an intercultural environment: The case of the Erasmus ip IP sono un migrante. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 510-517.
Dolga, L., Filipescu, H., Popescu-Mitroi, M. M., & Mazilescu, C. A. (2015). Erasmus mobility im- pact on professional training and personal development of students beneficiaries. Procedia-So- cial and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1006-1013.
Engel, C. (2010). The impact of Erasmus mobility on the professional career: Empirical results of international studies on temporary student and teaching staff mobility. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, (4), 351-363.
Ersoy, A. (2013). Türk öğretmen adaylarının kültürlerarası deneyimlerinde karşılaştıkları sorunlar: Erasmus değişim programı örneği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 154-166.
Ersoy, A., & Günel, E. (2011). Cross-cultural experiences through Erasmus: Pre-service teachers' individual and professional development. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 63- 78.
EU Councıl (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training ('ET 2020'). Official Journal of the European Union.
European Commision (2015) Erasmus facts, figures and trends. http://ec.europa.eu/education/li- brary/statistics/ay-12-13/facts-figures_en.pdf adresinden 23.02.2015 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Fargion, S., Gevorgianiene, V., & Lievens, P. (2011). Developing entrepreneurship in social work through international education. Reflections on a European intensive programme. Social Work Education, 30(8), 964-980.
Gibbons, M. (1998). Higher education relevance in the 21st century. Presented at the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Göksu, F. (2011). Bir kültürlerarası iletişim incelemesi: Erasmus Programı ile Avusturya'ya gi- den Türk öğrencilerin yaşantı ve beklentileri üzerine yapılan odak grup çalışması. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
Gudykunst, W. B. (2000). Methodological issues in conducting theory-based cross-cultural re- search. Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures, 293-315.
Higgins, R., Robinson, L., & Hogg, P. (2014). An evaluation of the student and tutor experience of a residential summer school event (OPTIMAX). Radiography, 20(4), 363-368.
Holligan, C., Wilson, M., & Humes, W. (2011). Research cultures in English and Scottish university education departments: an exploratory study of academic staff perceptions. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 713-734.
Ingerman, Å., & Booth, S. (2003). Expounding on physics: A phenomenographic study of physi- cists talking of their physics. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25(12), 1489-1508.
James, C. (2013). Enhancing the QLD: internationalisation and employability: the benefits of Eras- mus Intensive Programmes. The Law Teacher, 47(1), 64-82.
Jones, H. C. (2005). Lifelong learning in the European Union: whither the Lisbon Strategy?. Euro- pean Journal of Education, 40(3), 247-260.
Karakaş, A. (2012, May). English as a langua franca: Practices of academics in A Turkish Universi- ty. In Fifth International Conference of English as a Lingua Franca.
Karakütük, K. (2002). Öğretim üyesi ve bilim insanı yetiştirme: Lisansüstü öğretimin planlanması. Anı Yayıncılık.
Kasapoğlu-Önder, R., & Balcı, A. (2010). Erasmus öğrenci öğrenim hareketliliği programının 2007 yılında programdan yararlanan Türk öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 93-116.
Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna Process and the Lisbon Research Agenda: The European Com- mission's expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 203-223.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors' conceptions of research: What are they?. Scandinavi- an Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245-262.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Kotzabassaki, S., Alabaster, E. S., And, K., Larsson, U., & de Vree, W. (2003). Care of older people in nursing homes: an Intensive Programme as an educational activity within Erasmus-Socrates. Nurse Education Today, 23(2), 138-145.
Krzaklewska, E., & Krupnik, S. (2008). The role of the Erasmus programme in enhancing inter- cultural dialogue. Presentation of the results from the Erasmus student network survey 2007.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Ljosland, R. (2011). English as an Academic Lingua Franca: Language policies and multilingual practices in a Norwegian university. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 991-1004.
McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning. In ASCILITE conference. Perth, Australia (Vol. 327).
Miles, B. M. & Huberman, M. A. (2015). Nitel veri analizi (S. Akbaba Altun ve A. Ersoy Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Pegema Akademi.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. B., & Gibbons, M. T. (2013). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons.
Odabaşı, H. F., Fırat, M., İzmirli, S., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2010). Küreselleşen dünyada akademisyen olmak. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (3), s. 127 -142.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). On Becoming a Bi-Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quanti- tative and Qualitative Research Methodologies.
Özdem, G. (2013). Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında ERASMUS Programının Değerlendirilmesi (Gi- resun Üniversitesi Örneği). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(1), 61-98.
Papatsiba, V. (2005). Student mobility in Europe: An academic, cultural and mental journey? Some conceptual reflections and empirical findings. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, 3, 29-65.
Pépin, L. (2007). The History of EU Cooperation in the Field of Education and Training: how lifelong learning became a strategic objective. European Journal of Education, 42(1), 121-132.
Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a lingua franca. ELT journal, 59(4), 339.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage.
Süngü, H. ve Bayrakçı, M. (2010). Bolonya süreci sonrası yükseköğretimde akreditasyon çalışma- ları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 895-912.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioral sciences: a US perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(1): 61-77.
Teichler, U. (2001). Changes of ERASMUS under the umbrella of SOCRATES. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(3), 201-227.
Ünal, Ç., & İlter, İ. (2010). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Lisansüstü Eğitime Olan Tutumları (Fırat, Erzincan ve İnönü Üniversitesi Sınıf Öğretmenliği ABD Örneği)/Attitudes of Classroom Te- acher Candidates toward Graduate Education. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2).
Vural, S. M., Polatoğlu, Ç., & Griffith, L. A. (2013). Learning with different cultures in high educa- tion; an LLP Erasmus intensive programmed "Cultural Layers of Public Space". Procedia-So- cial and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 418-421.
Yağcı, E., Ekinci, C. E., Burgaz, B., Kelecioğlu, H., & Ergene, T. (2007). Yurt dışına giden hacet- tepe üniversitesi erasmus öğrencilerinin memnuniyet düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(33).
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Ankara: seçkin.
Yücel, M. S. (2013). Language and Cultural Experiences of German Language Pre-service Teach- ers within ERASMUS Programme. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sci- ences, 46(1), 23-47.
Yükseköğretim Kurumu. (2007). Türkiye'nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. http://www.yok.gov.tr/do- cuments/10279/30217/yok_strateji_kitabi/27077070-cb13-4870-aba1-6742db37696b adresin- den 25 Şubat 2016 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
Zufic, J., & Cvilinder, H. (2013, May). ICT learning experience in the multilingual and multicultural environment of ERASMUS IP TAARLoG project. In Information & Communication Techno- logy Electronics & Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2013, 36th International Convention on (pp. 616-621). IEEE.