___

• Akarsu, F. (2001). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar aileleri ve sorunları, Ankara: Eduser Yayınları.
• Akarsu, F. (2004). Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı, İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
• Altıntaş, E., & Gültekin, M. (2005). Psikolojik danışma kuramları. Aktüel Yayınları.
• Argyle, M. (Ed.). (2017). Social encounters: Contributions to social interaction. Routledge.
• Ataman, A. (2003). Üstün yetenekli/ zekalı çocuk ile yaşamak. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 4 (40), Haziran, 15-20.
• Berberoğlu, G. & Tansel, A. (2014). “Does private tutoring increase students‟ Academic performance? Evidence from Turkey”, International Review of Education, 60(5), 683-701, http://ftp.iza.org/dp8343.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 21.06.2017)
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they re-ally?. Educational psychology review, 15(1), 1-40.
• Brown, J.D., Dutton, K. A., & Cook, K. E. (2001). From the top down: Self-esteem and selfEvaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 615-631.
• Burleson, K. A. P. (2005). Social comparisons at gifted schools for the arts: Qualifications for the big fish little pond effect. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66, 1195.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of educational psycho-logy, 92(4), 703.
• Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill–Prentice Hall.
• Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. (1995). Appropriate differentiated services: Guides for best practices in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Today, 18(5), 32–33.
• Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W, & Print, M. (2000). Gifted, streamed, and mixed-ability programs for gifted students: Im-pact on self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51-75.
• Çivitçi, A. (1998). Lise öğrencilerinin çocukluk dönemlerine ilişkin algıladıkları anne-baba davranışları ile ken-dini kabul düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Ens-titüsü. Ankara.
• Dai, Y. D., & Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Edu-cational Psychology Review, 20, 283-317.
• Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Ferrer, M., & Fugate, A. M. (2003). Helping your school-age child develop a healthy self-concept. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS.
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
• Fiedler, E. D., Lange, R. E., & Winebrenner, S. (2002). In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24(3), 108–111.
• Freeman, J. (1997). The emotional development of the highly able European. Journal of Psychology in Education, XII, 479–493.
• Gross, M. U. M. (1999). Small poppies: Highly gifted children in the early years. Roper Rewiew, 21, 207-14
• Gross, M. U. M. (2002). Gifted children and the gift of friendship. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(3), 27–29.
• Guay, F., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2004). Academic self-concept and educational attainment level: A ten-year longitu-dinal study. Self and identity, 3(1), 53-68.
• Gubbins, E. J., Westberg, K. L., Reis, S. M., Dinnocenti, S. T., Tieso, C. L., Muller, L.M., Park, S., Emerick, L. J., Maxfi-eld, L. R., & Burns, D. E. (2002). Implementing a professional development model using gifted education strate-gies with all students (RM02172). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gif-ted and Talented.
• Hoge, R. D., & Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 449-465.
• Jackman, K., Wilson, I. G., Seaton, M., & Craven, R. G. (2011). Big Fish in a Big Pond: a study of academic self con-cept in first year medical students. BMC medical education, 11(1), 48.
• Karnes, F. A., & Wherry, J. N. (1981). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 49(3), 903-906.
• Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42, 64-68.
• Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of educational psycho-logy, 79(3), 280.
• Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their stu-dents’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445-480.
• Marsh, H. W. (2003). Big-fish-litde-pond effect on academic self-concept. Gennan foumal of Educational Psychology, 19, 119-127.
• Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285-319.
• Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The" big fish-little pond" effect. Academic Motivation of Adolescents,.
• Marsh H, & Craven R. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspecti-ve: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1(2):133-63.
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Craven, R. (2004). The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect Stands Up to Scrutiny.
• Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future rese-arch. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319-350.
• Metin, N., & Kangal, S. B. (2012). Bilim Sanat merkezlerine devam eden 12–14 yaş grubu üstün yetenekli çocukların benlik algılarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163).
• Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practi-ce. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 330-341.
• Nelson-Jones, R. (1995). Counselling and personality: Theory and practice. Allen & Unwin.
• Öner, N. (1996). Piers-Harris’ in Çocuklarda Öz-Kavramı Ölçeği El Kitabı. Türk Psikologlar Derneği, 1.
• Öner, N. (1997). Türkiyede Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler: Bir Başvuru Kaynağı, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 3. Basım, İstanbul. YÖK, 2006a. Yükseköğretim Kanunu (Kanun No: 2547 Kabul tarihi: 4.11. 1981).
• Passow, A. H. (1982). Differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented. In Curricula for the gifted: Selected proceedings for the First National Conference on Curricula for the Gifted/Talented (pp. 4-20).
• Precke, F., & Brüll, M. (2008). Grouping the gifted and talented: Are gifted girls most likely to suffer the consequen-ces?. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 54-85.
• Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students (Rev. ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educatio-nal practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396.
• Sak, U. (2017). Üstün zekalılar özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri. Vize Yayıncılık:Ankara
• Sankar–DeLeeuw, N. (2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 24(3), 172–177.
• Savaşır, I., Boyacıoğlu, G., & Kabakçı, E. (1996). Bilişsel davranışçı terapiler. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara.
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disor-ders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 260-271.
• Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 101(2), 403.
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of educational research, 46(3), 407-441.
• Siegle, D. & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 22–27.
• Super, D. E., & Bohn, M. J. (1970). Occupational psychology. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Thompson, R. A., & Goodman, M. (2011). The Architecture of Social Developmental Science. Social Development: Relationships in Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence.
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National Excellence: The case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
• VanTassel–Baska, J. L. (1992). Education decision making on acceleration and grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 68–72.
• Yörükoğlu, A. (1984). Değişen toplumda aile. Özgür Yayınevi, Ankara.