___

• Akgül, Y. (2018). Banking websites in Turkey: An accessibility, usability and security evaluation. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 10(1), 782–796.
• Akıncılar A., Dağdeviren M. (2014). A hybrid multi criteria decision making model to evaluate hotel websites, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 263-271.
• Baloğlu S., Pekcan Y.A. (2006). The website design and internet site marketing practices of upscale and luxury hotels in Turkey, Tourism Management, 27 (1), 171– 176.
• Bilsel R.U., Büyüközkan G., Ruan D. (2006). A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21, 1181-1197.
• Booth, D., & Jansen, B. J. (2010). A review of methodologies for analyzing websites. web technologies concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, Hershey, 145-166.
• Büyüközkan G., Çifçi G. (2012). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare ındustry, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2341- 2354.
• Büyüközkan G., Çifçi G., Güleryüz S. (2011). Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9407–9424.
• Büyüközkan G., Ruan D. (2007). Evaluating government websites based on a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15 (3), 321– 343.
• Chmielarz, W. and Zborowski, M. (2018a). Analysis of e-banking websites’ quality with the application of the TOPSIS method - appractical study. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1964–1976.
• Cyr, D. ve Bonanni, C. (2005). Gender and website design in e-business. International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(6), 565-582.
• Ecer, F. (2014). A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: A turkey case. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 758–782.
• Elisa, N. (2017). Usability, accessibility and web security assessment of e-government websites in Tanzania, International Journal of Computer Applications, 164 (5), 42–48.
• Ertuğrul, İ. ve Deniz, G. (2018). 4.0 Dünyası: Pazarlama 4.0 ve Endüstri 4.0. BEÜ SBE Dergisi. 7(1), 158-170.
• Esrock SL, Leichty GB. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages; self presenting or agenda setting?. Public Relations Review, 24:305-19.
• Kent ML, Taylor M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24:321-34.
• Kumar, V., Kalita, K., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). A SWARA-CoCoSo-based approach for spray painting robot selection. Informatica, 33(1), 35-54.
• MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decisionmaking among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. Rand Corp Santa Monica Ca.
• Maruf, M. (2021). Türkiye’de e- ticaret sitelerinin SWARA ve WASPAS yöntemleri ile web sitesi performansına göre sıralanması. TroyAcademy International Journal of Social Sciences. 6(2), 411-422.
• Maruf, M. ve Özdemir, K. (2021). Türkiye’deki ticari bankalara ait web sitelerin performanslarının SWARA ve ARAS yöntemi ile sıralanması. OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(Yönetim ve Organizasyon Özel Sayısı), 1514-1537.
• Miller, D.W., Starr, M.K. (1969), Executive Decisions and Operations Research. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey;
• Okay, A. ve Güçdemir, Y. (2011). Halkla ilişkilerde internet uygulamaları: Bugüne ve geleceğe dair bir bakış. M. Işık ve M. Akdağ (ED.), Dünden Bugüne Halkla İlişkiler içinde. Eğitim Kitabevi, Konya.
• Oppenhuisen, J. ve Zoonen, L. (2006). Supporters or customers? fandom, marketing and the political economy of Dutch football. Soccer & Society. 7:1, 62-75, DOI: 10.1080/14660970500355595.
• Özüpek MN. (2010). Belediyelerin halkla ilişkiler çalışmalarında internet kullanımı: Büyükşehir belediyeleri web siteleri üzerine uygulamalı bir çalışma. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 6(3).
• Pajić, V., Andrejić, M., & Kilibarda, M. (2021). Evaluation and selection of KPI in procurement and distribution logistics using SWARA-QFD approach. International Journal For Traffic And Transport Engineering (IJTTE), 11(2), 267-279.
• Sarkar, A. ve Pal, A. (2018). Websites of Indian banks: A webometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1-18.
• Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B. ve Karabasevic, D. (2015). Selection of candidates in the process of recruitment and selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS Methods, QUAESTUS Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6, (1), 53-62.
• Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D. ve Zavadskas, E.K. (2015). A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Engineering Economics, 26(2), 181-187.
• Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1989). An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox. Decision Support Systems, 5(3), 303-312.
• Uçak N, Çakmak T. (2009). Web sayfası kullanılabilirliğinin ölçülmesi: Hacettepe üniversitesi bilgi ve belge yönetimi bölümü web sayfası örneği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 22:278-98.
• Wan C.S. (2002). The web sites of international tourist hotels and tour wholesalers in Taiwan, Tourism Management, 23 (2), 155–160.
• Yücenur, G. N., & Ipekçi, A. (2021). SWARA/WASPAS methods for a marine current energy plant location selection problem. Renewable Energy, 163, 1287-1298.
• Yücenur,G.N. ve İpekçi, A. (2021). SWARA/WASPAS methods for a marine current energy plant location selection problem. Renewable Energy, 163, 1287-1298.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, 122(6), 3-6.