Örgütsel Ustalığın Performans Yönetimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir

Örgütler, çoğunlukla bulundukları piyasalarda rekabet üstünlüğü sağlayabilmek için yenilik yapma yolunu seçerek çeşitli girişimlerde bulunmaktadırlar. Buna karşın, rekabet üstünlüğünün elde edilmesi sürecinde çeşitli zorluklarla karşılaşılmaktadır. Örgütlerin, hem mevcut yeteneklerinden faydalanmaları hem de yenilerini araştırıp keşfetmeleri, rekabet avantajı sağlama açısından oldukça önemli olmaya başlamıştır. Örgütsel ustalığın performans yönetimi üzerindeki etkisini araştırmak, bu çalışmanın ana amacını oluşturmaktadır. Birincil veri toplama aracı olarak ilgili literatürden türetilen anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Hazırlanan anketler, Kahramanmaraş'ın ana sektörlerinde uygulanmıştır. Başlangıçta 200 anket dağıtılmış olup, toplamda 142 kullanılabilir veriye ulaşılmıştır. Anketlerin cevaplanma oranı % 71 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Toplanan veriler SPSS programında değerlendirilmiş olup, ölçeklerin güvenirlilikleri test edilmiş, frekans analizi, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucu, örgütsel ustalığın, performans yönetimini anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir

The Effects of Organizational Ambidexterity on Performance Management: An Emprical Study

Organizations often undertake a variety of initiatives, choosing the way to innovate to provide competitive advantage in the markets . However, various difficulties are encountered in the process of achieving competitive advantage. Both exploiting existing abilities and exploring and discovering new ones have become important in terms of providing competitive advantage for organizations.The effects of organizational ambidexterity on performance management is the main purpose of this study. Questinnaire techniques was used derived from existing literature as the primary data collection. The prepared questionnaires were applied in the main sectors of Kahramanmaraş. Initially, 200 questionnaires were distributed, but we obtained totally 142 usable questionnaires with a response rate of 71%. First of all, scales’ reliability was tested, frequency, correlation and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The results indicate that organizational ambidexterity affect performance management in a meaningful and positive way

___

  • Akal, Z (2002), İşletmelerde Performans Ölçüm ve Denetimi, Çok Yönlü Performans Göstergeleri, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları, 5. Basım, No: 473, Ankara.
  • Akdoğan, Ş., Akdoğan, A., and Cingöz, A (2009), “Organizational Ambidexterity: An Emprical Examination of Organizational Factors as Antecedents of Organizational Ambidexterity”, Journal of Global Strategic Management, No:6, ss. 17-27.
  • Attar, M (2015), Üst Düzey Yöneticilerin Liderlik Özelliklerinin Örgütsel Ustalık (Organizational Ambidexterity) Düzeyine Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Gazi Kitabevi, 1. Baskı, Ankara.
  • Auh, S. and Menguc, B (2005), “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: The moderating Role of Competitive intensity”, Journal of Business Research, No:58, ss. 1652-1661.
  • Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L (2003), “Exploitation, Exploration and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited”, Academy of Management, Vol.28, No:2, ss. 238-256.
  • Bingöl, D (2014), İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 9. Baskı, İstanbul.
  • Birkinshaw, J. and Gibson, C (2004), “Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.45, No:4, ss. 47-55.
  • Bodwell, W. and Chermark, T. J (2012), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Integrating Deliberate and Emergent Strategy with Scenario Planning”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, No:77, ss. 193- 202.
  • Boumgarden, P., Nıckerson, J. and Zenger, T (2012), “Sailing Into the Wind:Exploring the Relationships Among Ambidexterity, Vacillation and Organizational Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, No:33, ss. 587-610.
  • Cao, Q. , Gedalovıc, E. and Zhang, H (2009), “Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects”, Organization Science, ss.781-796.
  • Chang, Y. and Hughes, M (2012), “Drivers of İnnovation Ambidexterity in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms”, European Management Journal, 30, ss.1– 17.
  • Che-Ha, N., Mavondo, F. and Said, S (2014), “Performance or Learning Goal orientation:Implications for Business Performance”,Journal of Business Research, No:67, ss.2811–2820.
  • Chen, E.L. and Katila, R (2008), “Rival Interpretations of Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: Simultaneous or Sequential?”, Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, John Wiley. Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N. and Dimov, D (2013), “Shedding New Light On The Relationship Between Contextual Ambidexterity And Firm Performance: An İnvestigation Of İnternal contingencies”, Technovation, No:33, ss.119–132.
  • Çiftçi, G.E (2017), “Örgütsel Ustalık Çalışmalarının Personel Güçlendirme Üzerine Etkisi”, International Journal of Academic Value Studies, Vol.3,No: 10, ss.188-202.
  • Erşahan, B., Büyükbeşe, T., Bakan, İ. ve Sezer, B (2014), Çağdaş Yönetim Yaklaşımları, Edt. İsmail BAKAN, Beta Yayıncılık, 5. Basım, İstanbul.
  • Fettahlıoğlu, Ö., Fettahlıoğlu, S. Ve Birin, C (2016), Pazarlama Sektöründe Örgütsel Ustalığa Ulaşabilme Yolunda Otantik Liderlik Davranışlarının Rolü”, 3rd International Congress On Social Sciences, China To Ardiatic, Ekim, 27-30, Antalya.
  • He, Z. and Wong, P (2004), “Exploration Vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test Of The Ambidexterity Hypothesis”, Organization Science, Vol.15, No:4, ss.481-493.
  • Helvacı, M.A (2002), “Performans Yönetimi Sürecinde Performans Değerlendirmenin Önemi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.35, No:1.
  • Jansen, J.J.P., Bosch, A. J. and Volberda, H. W (2005), “Managing Potential And Realized Absorptive Capacirt: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter?”, The Academy Of Management Journal, ss.1-41.
  • Javier, T., Leopoldo, G. and Antonia, R (2014), “The Relationship Between Exploration And Exploitation Strategies, Manufacturing Flexibility And Organizational Learning: An Empirical Comparison BetweenNon-ISO And ISO Certified Firms”, European Journal Of Operational Research, 232, ss.72–86.
  • Karahan, A. ve Özgür, E (2011), Hastanelerde Performans Yönetim Sistemi ve Veri Zarflama Analizi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2. Basım, Ankara.
  • Kortmann, S., Gelhard, C., Zimmermann, C. and Piller, F.T (2014), “Linking Strategic Flexibility And Operational Efficiency: The Mediating Role Of Ambidextrous Operational Capabilities”, Journal Of Operations Management, Vol.32, ss.475–490.
  • Lee, C. and Huang, Y. (2012), “Knowledge Stock, Ambidextrous Learning And Firm Performance”, Management Decision, Vol. 50, No:6, ss.1096- 1116.
  • Lubatkin, M.H., Sımsek, Z., Ling, Y. and Veiga, J.F (2006), “Ambidexterity and Performance in Small to Medium-Sized Firms: ThePivotal Role of Top Managemant Team Behavioral Integration”, Journal of Management, Vol.32, No:5, ss.646-672.
  • March, J. G (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organizational Science, Vol.2, No:1, ss.71-87.
  • Menguc, B. and Auh, S (2008), “The Asymmetric Moderating Role of Market Orientation On The Ambidexterity- Firm Performance Relationship For Prospectors and Defenders”, Industrial Marketing Management, 37, ss.455-470.
  • Mirze, S. K (2010), İşletme, Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Nunally, J.C (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York. O’Reilly, C. A. and Tushman, M. L (2008), “Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma”, Organizational Behaviour, 28, ss.185-206.
  • O’Reilly, C. A. and Tushman, M. L (2013), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future”, Academy of Management Perspectives (in press), ss.1-30.
  • Paliokaite, A. and Pacesa, N (2014), “The Relationship Between Organizational Foresight and Organizational Ambidexterity”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 20, ss.1-17
  • Philpott, L. and Sheppard, L (1992), Managing for Improved Performance, Edit. Michael Armstrong, “Strategiesfor Human Resource Management”,British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, British Library, London.
  • Pinnington A. and Edwards, T (2000), Human Resource Management, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. and Tushman, M.L (2009), “ Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration For Sustained performance”, Organization Science, Vol.20, No:4, ss.685-695.
  • Raisch, S. and Birkinshaw, J (2008), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents Outcomes, and Moderators”, Journal of Management, 34, ss.1-36.
  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., and Thusman, M (2009), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance”, Organization Science, Vol.20, No:4, ss.685-695. Reeves, M., Haanas, K., Hollingsworth, J. and Pasini, F. L. S (2013),
  • Ambidexterity: The Art of Complex Environments, Perspectives, The Boston Colsulting Group. Şimşek, M.Ş. ve Öge, H.S (2007), Stratejik ve Uluslararası Boyutları ile İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Tansley, C., Kırk, S., Williams, H., and Barton, H (2014), “Tipping the scales: Ambidexterity Practices On E-HRM Projects”, Employee Relations, Vol.36, No:4, ss. 398-414.
  • Tunçer, P (2013), “Örgütlerde Performans Değerlendirme Ve Motivasyon”, Sayıştay Dergisı̇ , 88.
  • Turner, N., Maylor, H. and Swart, J (2011), “Ambidexterity-as-Practice: Understanding the Role of the Manager in IT-Services Projects”, School of Management, ss.1-17.
  • Tushman, M.L. and O’Reilly, C (1996), “Ambidexterious Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change,” California Management Rev. 38, ss.8-30.
  • Tutar, H. ve Altınöz, M (2010), “Örgütsel İklimin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Ostim İmalât İşletmeleri Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65, 2.
  • Uysal, Ş (2015), “Performans Yönetimi Sisteminin Tanımı, Tarihçesi, Amaç Ve Temel Unsurlarına Genel Bir Bakış”, Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges-October/Ekim.
  • Voss, G. and Voss, Z.G (2012), “Strategic Ambidexterity In Small And medium sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration Andexploitation In Product And Market Domains”, Organization Science, Articles İn Advance, ss.1-9.