SEMA ÖZKADİF, EMRULLAH EKEN, AYŞE HALIGÜR

The Biometric Ratios on the Tarsus of the Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Based on 3D Reconstructed Images

This study was undertaken to perform a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the tarsal bones of chinchillas using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images and reveal biometric ratio of the bones and compare between sexes. For this purpose, a total of 12 adult chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) of both sexes (six males and six females) were used. After anesthetizing the animals, MDCT images were obtained in DICOM format, and 3D reconstruction was performed on a computer using the Mimics 13.1 program. The volumes and surface areas of each of the bones that constitute the tarsus of the chinchilla were automatically measured by the program based on the 3D model. After all values of each tarsal bone were expressed as ratios with in tarsus, they were analyzed statistically to reveal diffrences between sexes. The results showed that there were statistical diffrences (P

Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Tarsus’unda Üç Boyutlu Rekontrüksiyon Görüntülerine Dayalı Biyometrik Oranlar

Bu çalışma şinşillanın tarsal kemiklerinin multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografi (MDBT) görüntülerini kullanarak üç boyutlu (3B) rekonstrüksiyonunu yapmak ve kemiklerin biyometrik oranlarını ortaya koymak ve cinsiyetler arasında karşılaştırmak amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Bunun için her iki cinsiyetten (6 erkek, 6 dişi) toplam 12 adet yetişkin şinşilla (Chinchilla lanigera) kullanıldı. Anestezi altında hayvanların MDBT görüntüleri alındıktan sonra DICOM formatında depolandı ve Mimics 13.1 programının olduğu bir bilgisayarda 3B rekonstrüksiyonları gerçekleştirildi. 3B modeli ortaya konulan şinşilla tarsus’unu oluşturan tarsal kemiklerin her birinin hacimleri ve yüzey alanları otomatik olarak program tarafından ölçüldü. Her bir tarsal kemik değerinin tarsus’daki oranları belirtildikten sonra, cinsiyetler arasındaki farklılıkları ortaya çıkarmak için istatistiki analiz yapıldı. Sonuçlar hacim oranına göre calcaneus, talus, os tarsi centrale ve os tarsale IV’de ve yüzey alanı oranına göre os tarsi centrale, os tarsale I ve os tarsale IV’de cinsiyetler arasında istatistiki farkın (P

PDF

___

Siddiqi N, Norrish M: Sexual dimorphism from femoral bone dimensions parameters among African Tribes and South Africans of European descent. Int J Forensic Sci Sexual, 2 (3): 1-11, 2018.

Navsa N, Steyn M, Iscan MY: Sex determination from the metacarpals in a modern South African male and female sample UPS Space University, Pretoria, 2008. www.up.ac.az/dspace/handle.net; Accessed: 23 September 2018.

Eshak GA, Ahmed HM, Abdel Gawad EA: Gender determination from hand bones length and volume using multidetector computed tomography: A study in Egyptian people. J Forensic Leg Med, 18, 246-252, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfl.2011.04.005

Harris SM, Case DT: Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: Implications for sex determination. J Forensic Sci, 57, 295-305, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02004.x

Smart TS: Carpals and tarsals of mule deer, black bear and human: an osteology guide for the archaeologist. MSc Thesis, Western Washington University, 2009.

Jain ML, Dhande SG, Vyas NS: Computer aided diagnosis of human foot’s bones. IJBES, 1, 17-26, 2014.

Brzobohata H, Krajicek V, Horak Z, Veleminska J: Sexual dimorphism of the human tibia through time: Insights into shape variation using a surface-based approach. PLoS One, 11 (11): e0166461, 2016. DOI:10.1371/ journal.pone.0166461

Shearer BM, Sholts SB, Garvin HM, Wärmländer SKTS: Sexual dimorphism in human browridge volume measured from 3D models of dry crania: A new digital morphometrics approach. Forensic Sci Int, 222 (1- 3): 400.e1-400.e5, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.013

Podhade DN, Shrivastav AB, Vaish R, Tiwari Y: Morphology and morphometry of tarsals of the leopard (Panthera pardus). Res J Anim Vet Fishery Sci, 2, 20-21, 2014.

Choudhary OMP, Ishwer S, Bharti SK: Gross and biometrical studies on the tarsal bones of Indian blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra). IJBAAR, 13, 453-456, 2015.

Ajayi IE, Shawulu JC, Zachariya TS, Ahmed S, Adah BMJ: Osteomorphometry of the bones of the thigh, crus and foot in the New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ital J Anat Embryol, 117, 125- 134, 2012.

Onwuama KT, Ojo SA, Hambolu JO, Dzenda T, Zakari FO, Salami SO: Macro-anatomical and morphometric studies of the hindlimb of grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus, Temminck-1827). Anat Histol Embryol, 47, 21-27, 2018. DOI: 10.1111/ahe.12319

Yadav S, Joshi S, Mathur R, Choudhary OP: Morphometry of tarsal and metatarsal of Indian Spotted Deer (Axis axis). Indian Vet J, 92, 43-46, 2015.

Gielen IM, De Rycke LM, Van Bree HJ, Simoens PJ: Computed tomography of the tarsal joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res, 621 (2): 1911-1915, 2001. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1911

Girgiri IA, Yahaya A, Gambo BG, Majama YB, Sule A: Osteomorphology of the appendicular skeleton of four-toed african hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris) Part (2): Pelvic limb. Glob Vet, 16, 413-418, 2016.

Kai Y, Matsumoto K, Kameoka S, Arai S, Matsumoto N, Komiyama K, Shimba S, Honda K: Observation of the tarsus joint in the Mop-3/ Bmal-1 gene knock-out mouse using “In vivo” Micro-CT: Inflence of diet and sex on calcification of the tendon of the tarsus joint. J Hard Tissue Biol, 21, 133-140, 2012. DOI: 10.2485/jhtb.21.133

Richbourg HA, Martin MJ, Schachner ER, Mcnulty MA: Anatomical variation of the tarsus in common inbred mouse strains. Anat Rec, 300, 450-459, 2017. DOI 10.1002/ar.23493

Bortolini Z, Lehmkuhl RC, Ozeki LM, Tranquilim MV, Sesoko NF, Teixeira CR, Vulcano LC: Association of 3D reconstruction and conventional radiography for the description of the appendicular skeleton of chelonoidis carbonaria (Spix, 1824). Anat Histol Embryol, 41, 445-452, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2012.01155.x

Getman LM, Ross MW, Smith MA: Surgical repair of fractures of the lateral and medial tibial malleoli in a yearling Arabian filly. Equine Vet Educ, 24, 496-502, 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00328.x

Brenner SZG, Hawkins MG, Tell LA, Hornof WJ, Plopper CG, Verstraete FJM: Clinical anatomy, radiography, and computed tomography of the chinchilla skull. Comp Cont Educ Pract, 27, 933-942, 2005.

Çevik-Demirkan A, Özdemir V, Demirkan I: Anatomy of the hind limb skeleton of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). Acta Vet Brno, 76, 501- 507, 2007. DOI: 10.2754/avb200776040501

Gasse CAS: Contribution radiologique et ostéologique à la connaissance du chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). These pour obtenir le grade de Docteur Veterinaire. Ministere de L’agriculture et de la Peche Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouse. France. 94-97. 2008.

Ozkadif S, Varlik A, Kalayci I, Eken E: Morphometric evaluation of chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) femur with different modelling techniques. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 22, 945-951, 2016. DOI: 10.9775/ kvfd.2016.15683

Ozkadif S, Eken E, Dayan MO, Besoluk K: Determination of sex-related diffrences based on 3D reconstruction of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) vertebral column from MDCT scans. Vet Med-Czech, 62, 204-210, 2017. DOI: 10.17221/19/2015-VETMED

Prokop M: General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol, 45, S4-S10, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00358-3

Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S: Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology, 230, 619-628, 2004. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021726

Lammers AR, Dziech HA, German RZ: Ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in Chinchilla lanigera (Rodentia: Chinchillidae). J Mammal, 82, 79-189, 2001. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0179:OOSDIC>2.0.CO;2

Yamada K, Taniura T, Tanabe S, Yamaguchi M, Azemoto S, Wisner ER: The use of multi- detector row computed tomography (MDCT) as an alternative to specimen preparation for anatomical insrtuction. J Vet Med Educ, 34:143-150, 2007.

Jaeger M, Briand D, Borianne P, Bonnel F: Knee anatomy 3D reconstruction and visualization from CT scans. Surg Radiol Anat, 15 (3): 231-231, 1993.

Gezer İnce N, Demircioğlu İ, Yılmaz B, Ağyar A, Dusak A: Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101, 2018.

Özkadif S, Eken E, Kalaycı I: A three-dimensional reconstructive study of pelvic cavity in the New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Sci World J, 2014:489854, 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/489854

Watanabe Y, Ikegami R, Takasu K, Mori K: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images of pelvic muscle in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg, 40, 1931-1934, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.010

Jun BC, Song SW, Cho JE, Park CS, Lee DH, Chang KH, Yeo SW: Three-dimensional reconstruction based on images from spiral highresolution computed tomography of the temporal bone: Anatomy and clinical application. J Laryngol Otol, 119, 693-698, 2005.

Miyamoto R, Tadano S, Sano N, Inagawa S, Adachi S, Yamamoto M: The impact of three-dimensional reconstruction on laparoscopic-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 12, 251-256, 2017. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.67996

Kim M, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC: Evaluation of accuracy of 3D reconstruction images using multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent, 42, 25-33, 2012. DOI: 10.5624/isd. 2012.42.1.25