Metronidazole resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from different animal species

Bu çalışmada çeşitli hayvanlardan izole edilen Campylobacter jejuni ve Campylobacter coli suşlarında metronidazol direnç sıklığının belirlenmesi ve karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Çalışmada tavuk, sığır, koyun ve köpek kökenli 240 C. jejuni/C.coli izolatının metronidazol Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyon (MIC) değerleri agar dilusyon tekniği ile incelendi. Direnç sıklığı 133 tavuk, 32 sığır, 48 koyun ve 27 köpek orijinli izolatlar için sırasıyla %91.7, %18.75, %16.7, ve %18.5 oranlarında bulundu. Yüz yetmiş C. jejuni izolatının %52.9’unda ve 70 C. coli suşunun %72.85’inde metronidazol dirençliliği saptandı. Farklı hayvan izolatları için metronidazol MIC (mcg/ml) aralıkları şu şekilde bulundu; tavuk, 2->64; sığır, 0.25-32, koyun, 0.12-16 ve köpek, 0.25-32. Farklı hayvan izolatları için metronidazol MIC50/MIC90 değerleri; tavuk 16/64 (mcg/ml), sığır 2/8 (mcg/ml), koyun 1/8 (mcg/ml) ve köpek 2/8 (mcg/ml) olarak tespit edildi. Çalışma sonucunda kampilobakterlerde metronidazol duyarlılığı bakımından çeşitlilik olduğu ve direnç sıklığının suşun kökenine göre değiştiği anlaşıldı. Dirençli suşların tavuklarda neden daha sık görüldüğü açıklanamamakla birlikte metronidazol dirençliliği bakımından bir konak fenotip varlığının olduğu ortaya konuldu.

Farklı hayvan türlerinden izole edilen Campylobacter jejuni ve Campylobacter coli türlerinin metronidazol duyarlılıkları

In this study, we aimed to screen animal isolates of Campylobacter jejuni/Campylobacter coli for resistance to metronidazole and compared the resistance of selected groups of isolates. A total of 240 C. jejuni/C. coli isolates isolated from chickens, cattle, sheep and dogs were tested by an agar dilution technique to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of metronidazole. The frequency of resistance in 133 avian, 32 bovine, 48 ovine and 27 canine isolates were 91.7%, 18.75%, 16.7% and 18.5%, respectively. Of 170 C. jejuni and 70 C. coli isolates tested, 52.9% and 72.85% were resistant to metronidazole, respectively. MIC (mcg/ml) ranges of metronidazole for animal isolates were as follows: chicken, 2->64; cattle, 0.25-32; sheep, 0.12-16 and dog, 0.25-32. MIC50/MIC90 values of metronidazole for animal isolates were as follows: chicken 16/64 (mcg/ml), cattle 2/8 (mcg/ml), sheep 1/8 (mcg/ml) and dog 2/8 (mcg/ml). We observed a wide range of sensitivity to metronidazole among campylobacters and frequency of resistance differed in relation to the origin of the isolate. Although it was not clear why the resistant isolates were common in chickens, a host-phenotype relationship for metronidazole resistance was demonstrated..

___

  • 1. Samuelson J: Why metronidazole is active against both bacteria and parasites. Antimicrob Agents Ch, 43, 1533-1541, 1999.
  • 2. Smith MA, Jorgensen MA, Mendz GL, Hazell SL: Metronidazole resistance and microaerophily in Campylobacter species. Arch Microbiol, 170, 279-284,1998.
  • 3. Harada K, Asai T, Kojima A, Sameshima T, Takahashi T: Characterization of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter coli isolates from food-producing animals on farms across Japan during 2004. J Vet Med Sci, 68, 1109-1111, 2006.
  • 4. Kaneene JB, Padungton P: Campylobacter spp. in human, chickens, pigs and their antimicrobial resistance. J Vet Med Sci, 65, 161-170, 2003.
  • 5. Moreno Y, Hernandez M, Ferrus MA, Alonso JL, Botella S, Montes R, Hernandez J: Direct detection of thermotolerant campylobacters in chicken products by PCR and in situ hybridization. Res Microbiol, 152, 577-582, 2001.
  • 6. Bawa EK, Adekeye JO, Oyedipe EO, Umoh JU: Prevalence of bovine campylobacteriosis in indigenous cattle of three states in Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod, 13, 157-160, 1991.
  • 7. Doyle MP: Association of Campylobacter jejuni with laying hens and eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol, 47, 533-536, 1948.
  • 8. Uysal H: Glycosylated proteins of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 14 (2): 179-184, 2008.
  • 9. Mendz GL, Mégraud F: Is the molecular basis of metronidazole resistance in microaerophilic organisms understood? Trends Microbiol, 10, 370-375, 2002.
  • 10. Bolton FJ, Holt AV, Hutchinson DN: Campylobacter biotyping scheme of epidemiological value. J Clin Pathol, 37, 677-681, 1984.
  • 11. On SLW: Identification methods for Compylobacters, Helicobacters and related organisms. Clin Microbiol Rev, 9, 405422, 1996.
  • 12. Aydin F, Atabay HI, Akan M: The isolation and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni subsp jejuni from domestic geese (Anser anser). J Appl Microbiol, 90, 637-642, 2001.
  • 13. Atabay HI, Corry JEL: The isolation and prevalence of campylobacters from dairy cattle using a variety of methods. J Appl Microbiol, 84, 733-740, 1998.
  • 14. Skirrow MB, Benjamin J: Campylobacter: Cultural characteristics of intestinal campylobacters from man and animals. J Hyg, 85, 427-442, 1980.
  • 15. Stanley KN, Jones K: High frequency of metronidazole resistance among strains of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from birds. Lett Appl Microbiol, 27, 247-250, 1998.
  • 16. Hayward CL, Erwin ME, Barrett MS, Jones RN: Comparative antimicrobial activity of gatifloxacin tested against Campylobacter jejuni including fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 34, 99-102, 1999.
  • 17. Hannah MW, Molitoris D, John SS, Vu A, Read EK, Finegold SM: In vitro activities of faropenem against 579 strains of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Ch, 46, 3669-3675, 2002.
  • 18. Land KM, Johnson PJ: Molecular basis of metronidazole resistance in pathogenic bacteria and protozoa. Drug Resist Update, 2, 289-294, 1999.
  • 19. Tankovic J, Lamarque D, Delchier JC, Soussy CJ, Labigne A, Jenks PJ : Frequent association between alteration of the rdxA gene and metronidazole resistance in French and North African isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Ch, 44, 608613, 2000.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Establishing the optimum cutting date and additives for pasture Grass silage and ıts Mycotoxin levels

CAVİT ARSLAN, Dinç EŞSİZ

The effects of hen age, genotype, period and temperature of storage on egg quality

ZEHRA BOZKURT, Mustafa TEKERLİ

Repair of peroneal paralysis by muscle transposition in sheep

ENGİN KILIÇ, ÖZGÜR AKSOY, İSA ÖZAYDIN, SAVAŞ ÖZTÜRK, MAHMUT SÖZMEN, BAŞAK KURT

İpekböceği (Bombycidae: Bombyx mori)'nde juvenil ve ekdizon hormonları uygulaması sonucu olası değişimler

GAMZE TURGAY İZZETOĞLU, Ferda ÖZKORKMAZ, Özlem ZEKA, Ayla ÖBER

Immunohistochemical distribution of ınsulin-, glucagon- and somatostatin-containing cells in the pancreas of the rat (Wistar albino)

Hakan KOCAMIŞ, EBRU KARADAĞ SARI, Mümtaz NAZLI, Nurhayat GÜLMEZ, ŞAHİN ASLAN, TURGAY DEPREM

Dikim sıklığının yerelmasının (Helianthus tuberosus L.) hasıl verimi ve silaj kalitesi üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi

M. Akif KARSLI, N. Tuğba BİNGÖL

DMBA ile indüklenmiş kobayların beyin dokusundaki bazı elemetler üzerine alfa lipoik asidin etkisi

HARUN ÇİFTÇİ, AHMET ÖZKAYA, ALPASLAN DAYANGAÇ, ALİ ÖLÇÜCÜ, Sait ÇELIK, Zafer ŞAHİN, Sema ATEŞ

Comparison of two different methots to predict meat quality and prediction possibility using digital ımage analysis

YALÇIN BOZKURT, SERKAN ÖZKAYA, Bürol KILIÇ

Variance components and genetic parameter estimates using random regression models on test day milk yields of holstein friesians

ÇİĞDEM TAKMA, Yavuz AKBAŞ

The problem of cystic echinococcosis in Van province

HASAN YILMAZ, Zeynep Taş CENGIZ, MUTALİP ÇİÇEK