Mohamed A. HELAL, Shawky MAHMOUD, Shymaa S. BELAL, Ahlam E. YONIS, Abeer F. EL NAHAS

Kanatlı İnfluenza Virus Enfeksiyonunda Mx ve MHC Dayanıklı Allellerinin Mevcudiyeti ve Mısır’daki Tavuk Cinslerindeki Salgınlarla Karşılaştırılması

Bu çalışmada, Mısır’da toplam 12 tavuk cinsinde Kanatlı İnfluenza insidansı ile birlikte Mx ve MHC allellerinin varlığı araştırıldı. Çalışmada, 2014 ile 2017 yılları arasındaki dört yıllık periyotta meydana gelen Kanatlı İnfluenza vakaları kullanıldı. PCR, RFLP ve DNA sekans analizi kullanılarak 310 tavuğun genotiplendirilmesi gerçekleştirildi. Baldi (yerel) tavukları H5 ve H9 başta olmak üzere tüm kanatlı influenza tiplerinden en çok etkilenen idi. Ayrıca, Kanatlı influenzası ticari broiler tavuklarda yumurtacılardan daha ziyadesi ile gözlemlendi. Mx genotipi ile ilgili olarak, Baldi, Cobb ve Ross cinsleri arasında dirençli olan tek genotip (Mx/A+) olmakla beraber, bu cinsler kanatlı influenzasından en çok etkilenenlerdi. MHC haplotipi ile ilgili olarak, ne B21 (oldukça patojenik Kanatlı İnfluenza dayanıklı allel) ne de B13 (duyarlı allel) çalışmadaki kanatlılar arasında tespit edildi. Homozigot genotipler B4/B4 ve B11/B11 en yaygın olup yeni MHC allelleri de belirlendi. Kanatlı İnfluenza salgınlarında tavuk cinslerinin adlarının kayıt edilmesi deneysel enfeksiyonlardan daha ziyadesi ile salgınlarda duyarlı cinslerin belirlenmesinde faydalı olacaktır. Kanatlı influenzasına en duyarlı cinslerin tespitine yönelik ileri çalışmalara hastalığın epidemiyolosindeki rolünün açığa çıkarılması amacıyla ihtiyaç duyulmakta olup bu cinslerin hastalık salgınlarının meydana geldiği kış aylarında kullanımının kısıtlanması tavsiye edilebilir.

Survey on the Presence of the Mx and MHC Resistance Alleles to Avian Influenza Virus Infection Compared with its Outbreaks Among Chicken Breeds in Egypt

A parallel survey for the incidence of AI in chicken breeds in Egypt including 12 breeds was performed, together with the screening forthe presence of their Mx and MHC alleles. Four years’ worth of records of occurrences AI types extending from 2014 to 2017 were used.Also genotyping for the 310 birds under the study using PCR, RFLPs and DNA sequencing was performed. The Baldi (native) chickenswere the most affected with all types of AI, especially H5 and H9. In addition, AI was observed in the commercial broilers rather thanthe layers. Regarding the Mx genotypes, although the only detected genotype was the resistance one (Mx/A+) among the Baldi, Cobband Ross, they were the most affected with AI. Regarding the MHC haplotypes, neither the B21 (resistance allele to highly pathogenicAI [HPAI]) nor B13 (susceptible allele) was detected among the studied birds. The homozygous genotypes B4/B4 and B11/B11 were themost common, and new MHC alleles were recorded. We recommend recording the names of chicken breeds in AI outbreaks, which willfacilitate identification of susceptible breeds in AI outbreaks rather than experimental infection. Further study should be carried outon the most affected breeds with AI to explore their role in the disease epidemiology and whether it is recommended to limit their useduring winter, when AI outbreaks occur.

PDF

___

1. Bacon LD, Hunt HD, Cheng HH: Genetic resistance to Marek’s disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 255, 121-141, 2001.
2. Taylor RL Jr: Major histocompatibility (B) complex control of response against Rous sarcomas. Poult Sci, 83, 636-649, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/ps/ 83.4.638
3. Lee SH, Vidal SM: Functional diversity of Mx proteins: variations on a theme of host resistance to infection. Genome Res, 12 (4): 527-530, 2002. DOI: 10.1101/gr.20102
4. Briles WE, Briles RW: Identification of haplotypes of the chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex (B). Immunogenetics, 15, 449-459, 1982.
5. Boonyanuwat K, Thummabutra S, Sookmanee N, Vatchavalkhu, V, Siripholvat V, Mitsuhashi T: Influences of MHC class II haplotypes on Avian influenza traits in Thai indigenous chicken. J Poult Sci, 43, 120-125, 2006. DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.43.120
6. Chazara O, Juul-Madsen HR, Chang CS, Tixier-Boichard M, Bed’hom B: Correlation in chicken between the marker LEI0258 alleles and major histocompatibility complex sequences. BMC Proc, 5 (Suppl. 4): S29, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S29
7. Watanabe T: Polymorphisms of the chicken antiviral MX gene. Cytogenet. Genome Res, 117 (1-4), 370-375, 2007. DOI: 10.1159/000103200
8. Ko JH, Takada A, Mitsuhashi T, Agui T, Watanabe T: Native antiviral specificity of chicken Mx protein depends on amino acid variation at position 631. Anim Genet, 35, 119-122. 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052. 2004.01096.x
9. Sartika T, Sulandari S, Zein MSA: Selection of Mx gene genotype as genetic marker for Avian Influenza resistance in Indonesian native chicken. BMC Proc, 5 (Suppl. 4): S37, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S37
10. Quan TZ, Wei WX, Min S, Yan YH, Bing CG, Wei RL, Chun LB: The genetic distribution and polymorphism analysis of antiviral resistant Mx gene locus in fifteen Chinese indigenous chicken breeds. J Anim Vet Adv, 9 (2): 402-405, 2010. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.402.405
11. Ommeh S, Jin N, Eding H, Muchadeyi FC, Sulandari S, Zein MSA, Danbaro G, Wani C, Zhao SG, Nie QH, Zhang XQ, Ndila M, Masiga D, Preisinger R, Chen GH, Hanotte O, Jianlin H, boWeigend S: Assessment of the geographical distribution of G/A SNP at nucleotide position 1.892 of coding sequence of the chicken Mx gene. Int J Poult Sci, 9 (1): 32-38, 2010.
12. Goto RM, Afanassieff M, Ha J, Iglesias GM, Ewald SJ, Briles WE, Miller MM: Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) assays for major histocompatibility complex B genotyping in chickens. Poult Sci, 81, 1832-1841, 2002. DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.12.1832
13. Fulton JE, Juul-Madsen HR, Ashwell CM, McCarron A, Arthur JA, O’Sullivan NP, Taylor Jr RL: Molecular genotype identification of the Gallus gallus major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics, 58 (5-6): 407-421, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00251-006-0119-0
14. FAO: Agriculture Department. Animal Production and Health Division CHAPTER 3. H5N1 HPAI in Different Species. http://www.fao.org/avianflu/ documents/key_ai/key_book_ch3.3.htm; Accessed: 12/09/2018.
15. Sims LD, Ellis TM, Liu KK, Dyrting K,Wong H, Peiris M, Guan Y, Shortridge KF: Avian influenza in Hong Kong 1997-2002. Avian Dis, 47, 832-838, 2003, DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-47.s3.832
16. Ellis TM, Bousfield RB, Bissett LA, Dyrting KC, Luk GS, Tsim, ST, Sturm-Ramirez K, Webster RG, Guan Y, Peiris JSM. Investigation of outbreaks of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in waterfowl and wild birds in Hong Kong in late 2002. Avian Pathol, 33, 492-505, 2004. DOI: 10.1080/03079450400003601
17. Bertran K, Lee DH, Balzli C, Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Spackman E, Swayne DE: Age is not a determinant factor in susceptibility of broilers to H5N2 clade 2.3.4.4 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus. Vet Res, 47:116, 2016; DOI: 10.1186/s13567-016-0401-6
18. Fadhil M, Mercan L: Molecular characterization of mx gene polymorphism in gerze chicken breed and pure line chicken breed. Anim Res Int, 13 (3): 2540-2543, 2016.
19. Hassanane MS, Hassan AAM, Ahmed FM, El-Komy EM, Roushdy KM, Hassan NA: Identification of Mx gene nucleotide dimorphism (G/A) as genetic marker for antiviral activity in Egyptian chickens. J Genet Eng Biotechnol, 16 (1): 83-88, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.11.002
20. Schusser B, Reuter A, von der Malsburg A, Penski N, Weigend S, Kaspers B, Staeheli P, Hartle S: Mx is dispensable for interferon-mediated resistance of chicken cells against influenza a virus. J Virol, 85 (16), 8307- 8315, 2011. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00535-11
21. Sironi L, Williams JL, Moreno-Martin AM, Ramelli P, Stella A, Jianlin H, Weigend S, Lombardi G, Cordioli P, Mariani P: Susceptibility of different chicken lines to H7N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus and the role of Mx gene polymorphism coding amino acid position 631. Virology, 380,152-156, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.07.022
22. Sironi L, Williams JL, Stella A, Minozzi G, Moreno A, Ramelli P, Han J, Weigend S, Wan J, Lombardi G, Cordioli P, Mariani P: Genomic study of the response of chicken to highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. BMC Proc, 5 (Suppl. 4): S25, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S25
23. Hunt HD, Jadhao S, Swayne DE: Major histocompatibility complex and background genes in chickens influence susceptibility to high pathogenicity avian influenza virus. Avian Dis, 54 (S1): 572-575, 2010. DOI: 10.1637/8888-042409-ResNote.1
24. Shavakand FI: A molecular genetic survey of immune response genes and biodiversity of industrial and non-industrial chickens. PhD. Thesis. The University of British Columbia (Vancouver). Canada, 2011.
25. Matsuu A, Kobayashi T, Patchimasiri T, Shiina T, Suzuki S, Chaichoune K, Ratanakorn P, Hiromoto Y, Abe H, Parchariyanon S, Saito T: Pathogenicity of genetically similar, H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strains in chicken and the differences in sensitivity among different chicken breeds. PLoS One, 11 (4): e0153649, 2016. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0153649
26. More S, Bicout D, Bøtner A, Butterworth A, Calistri P, Depner K, Edwards S, Garin-Bastuji B, Good M, Gortazar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda MA, Nielsen SS, Raj M, Sihvonen L, Spoolder H, Thulke H-H, Velarde A, Willeberg P, Winckler C, Breed A, Brouwer A, Guillemain M, Harder T, Monne I, Roberts H, Baldinelli F, Barrucci F, Fabris C, Martino L, Mosbach-Schulz O, Verdonck F, Morgado J and Stegeman JA: EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW). EFSA J, 15 (10): e04991, 2017. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4991
27. Şentürk B, Güler H: Financial effects of HPAI H5N1 cases on backyard poultry in the Kızılırmak Delta. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20 (1): 73-78, 2014. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.9454