Do women in top management have an impact on banks' profitability? the case of north cyprus

Bu çalışma banka yönetim kurullarında kadın üyelerin olması ile finansal performans arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını analiz etmektedir. Bu doğrultuda 2003-2009 yılları arasında KKTC ticari bankaları üzerine yapılan analiz sonucunda banka karlılığı (aktifler üzerinde getiri) ve yönetim kurullarında kadın sayısı arasında herhangi bir bir ilişki tesbit edilmemiştir. Diğer yandan, yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü ve karlılık ve de kadın sayısı arasında positif bir ilişkiye rastlanılmıştır. KKTC bankalarında yönetim kurullarında çok az sayıda kadın üye olması cam tavan sendromunu ortaya koyarken şube müdürlerinin %40’ nın kadın olduğu görülmektedir. Analiz sonucu banka kadın şube müdürü sayısı ve banka finansal performansı arasında negatif bir ilişki tesbit edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre üst yönetimde ve banka şube müdürü olarak kadınların banka karlılığında rolü olduğunu görebilmekteyiz.

Üst düzey yönetimde kadın temsiliyetinin şirket finansal performansına etkisi: Kuzey Kıbrıs bankaları üzerine bir çalışma

This study aims to investigate whether female participation in management is a valuable management tool for commercial banks in North Cyprus or not. The women in top management who are board members and branch managers are taken into consideration. The article examines the commercial banks operating in North Cyprus between the years of 2003 and 2009. The analysis is made in regard to the number of females in top management and the financial performance ratios. The study can not detect any significant relationship between ROA (return on assets), the profitability measure, and the number of females on boards. However, there is a significance relationship between the board size and profitability and also between board size and the female member on boards. Although the number of female branch managers is comparatively higher, a negative significance is detected between profitability and the number of female branch managers. The results show that, there is no significant impact of women participation on boards and as branch managers on bank profitability in North Cyprus.

___

  • Adams R. & Ferreira D. (2003). Diversity and incentives: Evidence from Corporate Boards. Working Paper, University of Stockholm.
  • Adams R. B. & Ferreira D. (2004). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom. ECGI - Finance Working Paper #57/2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com.
  • Arfke D. E., Belalr S. L. & Helms M.M. (2004). The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisted: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards’. Journal of Business Ethics, 50:177-186.
  • Argawal A. & Knoebe C. (2001). Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44: 179-198.
  • Burke R. (2000a) Company Size, Board Size and the Numbers of Women Corporate Directors. In R. Burke and M. Mattis (Eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers:157–167.
  • Cabo R. M., Nogues R. G. & Nieto M. J. (2009). Gender Diversity on European Banks' Board of Directors: Traces of Discrimination. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com. Carter D., Simkins B. & Simpson W. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38: 33–53.
  • Catalyst (2003). Women in US Corporate Leadership: 2003. Retrieved October 8, 2012 from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/93/women-in-us-corporate-leadership- 2003.
  • Catalyst (2004). The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity (2004-2008), retrieved October 8, 2012 from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/479/the-bottom-line-corporate-performance-and- womens-representation-on-boards-20042008. Catalyst (2005). 2005
  • Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500, retrieved October 8, 2012 from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/19/2005- catalyst-census-of-women-board-directors-of-the-fortune-500
  • EPWN (2004). European Board Women Monitor 2004, European Profesional Women’s Network & Egon Zehnder International. Available at: http://www.europeanpwn.net.
  • EOWA (2006). Equal Opportunity for Women in Workplace2006, European Profesional Women’s Network & Egon Zehnder International, Available at: http://www.europeanpwn.net. Farrell K. A. & Whidbee D. A. (2005). Additions to Corporate Boards: The Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11: 85-106.
  • Farrell K. A. and P. L. Hersch (2004). Additions to Corporate Boards: The Effect of Gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10: 703-728.
  • Higgs D. (2003). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive Directors. Available at: http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_execs_review.
  • Kanter R. M. ( 1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Özataç N. (2010). Gender Diversity in Board of Directors and Top Management: The Case of Turkish Banks. Actual Problems of Economics, 115 (1): 311-319.
  • Richard, OC (2000), Racial Diversity, Business Strategy, and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2): 164- 177.
  • Shrader C. B., Blackburn V. B. & Lies P. (1997). Women in Management and Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9: 355–372.
  • Smith N., Smith V. & Verner M. (2006). Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55: 569–593.
  • Quack S. & Hancké B. (1997). Women in Decision-Making in Finance. European Commission and European Expert Network, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforchung retrieved October 8, 2012 http://www.eurit.it. Yoder J. D. (1991). Rethinging Tokenism, Gender and Society, 5 (2): 178-192.
  • Vinnicombe S., Sealy R. & Singh V. (2008). The Female FTSE Report 2008. A
  • Decade of Delay. International Center for Women Leaders, Cranfield School of Management.
  • Wolfers J. (2006). Diagnosing Discrimination: Stock Returns and CEO Gender. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2–3): 531–541.
  • Zahra S. A. & Stanton W. W. (1988). The Implications of Board of Directors’ Composition for Corporate Strategy and Performance. International Journal of Management, 5: 229-236.