Muhammad Bilal CHATTA, Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALİ, Muzaffar ALİ, Muhammad Anser BASHİR

3322

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF MONOCRYSTALLINE AND POLYCRYSTALLINE SOLAR MODULES AT DIFFERENT INCLINATION ANGLES

Photovoltaic modules have a potential market for off-grid applications in rural context with limited access to the electrical grid. For fixed photovoltaic systems, proper orientation of photovoltaic modules at specific conditions plays a significant role to have maximum performance. This paper presents the effects of different metrological parameters on the performance of photovoltaic modules at three different inclination angles (0°, 33.74° and 90°) with horizontal. Six 40W photovoltaic modules (three monocrystalline and three polycrystalline) were exposed to sunlight at three different inclination angles. Performance ratio, module efficiency, fill factor were calculated for photovoltaic module at different inclination angles and results presented. PV modules at 33.74° tilt angle received high solar radiation and showed high output power. As solar radiation increases, the radiation losses from the surface of the module increases and resultant decrease the module efficiency and increase the module temperature at high solar irradiance. During the winter months, the average efficiency of the monocrystalline PV module at 0° and 90° was 4% and 2% higher respectively than the 33.74° tilt angle. Similarly polycrystalline PV module showed 7% and 5% higher efficiency at 0° and 90° respectively than the 33.74°. Moreover, Fill factor of PV module at 33.74° tilt angle had the highest value as compared to other tilt angles. 
Keywords:

Photovoltaic Modules, Module Efficiency, Fill Factor, Inclination Angle,

PDF

___

  • [1] Carr, A. J. and T. L. Pryor (2004). "A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates." Solar energy 76(1-3): 285-294. [2] Sharma, V. and S. Chandel (2013). "Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: a review." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27: 753-767.
  • [3] Agroui, K., A. H. Arab, et al. (2011). "Indoor and outdoor photovoltaic modules Performances based on thin films solar cells." Revue des Energies Renouvelables 14(3): 469-480.
  • [4] Vikrant S., Chandel S.S., A review: Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27 (2013), pp.753–767.
  • [5] Almonacid F., Rus C., Hontoria L., Fuentes M., Nofuentes G., Characterisation of Si-crystalline PV modules by artificial neural networks, Renewable Energy, 34 (2009), pp.941–949.
  • [6] Ye, J.-Y., K. Ding, et al. (2013). "Outdoor PV module performance under fluctuating irradiance conditions in tropical climates." Energy Procedia 33: 238-247.
  • [7] Bashir, M. A., H. M. Ali, et al. (2013). "An experimental investigation of performance of photovoltaic modules in Pakistan." Thermal Science (00): 134-134.
  • [8] Congedo, P. M., M. Malvoni, et al. (2013). "Performance measurements of monocrystalline silicon PV modules in South-eastern Italy." Energy Conversion and Management 68: 1-10.
  • [9] Pantić, L. S., T. M. Pavlović, et al. (2014). "A practical field study of performances of solar modules at various positions in Serbia." Thermal Science (00): 81-81.
  • [10] Kaldellis, J. and D. Zafirakis (2012). "Experimental investigation of the optimum photovoltaic panels’ tilt angle during the summer period." Energy 38(1): 305-314.
  • [11] Ahmad, G. E., H. M. S. Hussein, et al. (2003). "Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of PV modules." Renewable Energy 28(8): 1159-1168.
  • [12] Chang, Y.-P. (2010). "Optimal the tilt angles for photovoltaic modules in Taiwan." International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 32(9): 956-964.
  • [13] Abdelkader, M., A. Al-Salaymeh, et al. (2010). "A comparative analysis of the performance of monocrystalline and multiycrystalline PV Cells in semi-arid climate conditions: the case of Jordan." Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 4(5): 543-552.
  • [14] Amin, N., C. W. Lung, et al. (2009). "A practical field study of various solar cells on their performance in Malaysia." Renewable Energy 34(8): 1939-1946.
  • [15] Rahman, S., Khallat, M. A., & Salameh, Z. M. (1988). Characterization of insolation data for use in photovoltaic system analysis models. Energy, 13(1), 63-72.
  • [16] Celik, A. N. (2003). Long-term energy output estimation for photovoltaic energy systems using synthetic solar irradiation data. Energy, 28(5), 479-493.
  • [17] Diaf, S., Notton, G., Belhamel, M., Haddadi, M., & Louche, A. (2008). Design and techno-economical optimization for hybrid PV/wind system under various meteorological conditions. Applied Energy, 85(10), 968-987.
  • [18] Sharma, V., & Chandel, S. S. (2013). Performance and degradation analysis for long term reliability of solar photovoltaic systems: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 753-767.
  • [19] Evans, D. L. (1981). Simplified method for predicting photovoltaic array output. Solar energy, 27(6), 555-560.
  • [20] Evans, D. L., & Florschuetz, L. W. (1977). Cost studies on terrestrial photovoltaic power systems with sunlight concentration. Solar Energy, 19(3), 255-262.
  • [21] Siegel, M. D., Klein, S. A., & Beckman, W. A. (1981). A simplified method for estimating the monthly-average performance of photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 26(5), 413-418.
  • [22] Stultz, J. W., & Wen, L. C. (1977). Thermal performance testing and analysis of photovoltaic modules in natural sunlight. LSA Task Report, 5101, 31.
  • [23] Ravindra, N. M., & Srivastava, V. K. (1979). Temperature dependence of the maximum theoretical efficiency in solar cells. Solar Cells, 1(1), 107-109.
  • [24] Jiang, H., L. Lu, et al. (2011). "Experimental investigation of the impact of airborne dust deposition on the performance of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules." Atmospheric Environment 45(25): 4299-4304.
  • [25] Mani, M. and R. Pillai (2010). "Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(9): 3124-3131.
  • [26] Chamoli, S., R. Chauhan, et al. (2012). "A review of the performance of double pass solar air heater." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(1): 481-492.
  • [27] Gautam, A., S. Chamoli, et al. (2017). "A review on technical improvements, economic feasibility and world scenario of solar water heating system." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 541-562.
  • [28] Ahmadi, A., D. D. Ganji, et al. (2016). "Analysis of utilizing Graphene nano platelets to enhance thermal performance of flat plate solar collectors." Energy Conversion and Management 126: 1-11.
  • [29] Taherian, H., A. Rezania, et al. (2011). "Experimental validation of dynamic simulation of the flat plate collector in a closed thermosyphon solar water heater." Energy Conversion and Management 52(1): 301-307.
  • [30] http://pveducation.org/pvcdrom/properties-sunlight/solar-radiation-tilted-surface.
Journal of Thermal Engineering-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

B. ALKAN, S.O. ATAYILMAZ

Eva TSVETANOVA

Muhammad Bilal CHATTA, Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALİ, Muzaffar ALİ, Muhammad Anser BASHİR

N. ALAGUMURTHİ, R. RAVİSANKAR, V.S.K. VENKATACHALAPATHY

Z. GEMİCİ

C. EVCİ, H. IŞIK

Hitesh BHARGAV, Bharat RAMANİ, V. Siva REDDY, Feng C. LAİ

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A DIESEL ENGINE WITHIN A MULTI- DIMENSIONAL FRAMEWORK

Hasan KOTEN