___

• Anderson, D. (2014). Outliers: Elementary teachers who actually teach social studies. The Social Studies, 105(2), 91-100, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00377996.2013.850055
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2003). Why don't more history teachers engage students in interpretation?. Social Education, 67(6), 358-358.
• Barton, K., & Smith, L. (2000). Themes or motifs? Aiming for coherence through interdisciplinary outlines. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 54-63. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/general/Publications/Journals/RT.aspx
• Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39(3), 370-380.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
• Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880's to the present). In P. Jackson (ed.), Contribution to Educational Change: Perspectives on Research and Practice (pp. 85-106). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Glaser, B. G., & Straus, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine. Guidry, A., Cuthrell, K., O’Connor, K., & Good, A. (2010). From the green mile to the yellow brick road: Using a practical model to fill in the social studies content gap. The Social Studies, 101(1), 22-29.
• Hinde, E. (2005). Revisiting curriculum integration: A fresh look at an old idea. The Social Studies, 96(3), 105-111.
• Hootstein, E. W. (1999). Differentiation of instructional methodologies in social studies at the secondary level. Journal of Social Studies Research, 23(1), 11-18. Retrieved from http://www.thejssr.com/
• Jewett, S. (2007). The stories of people’s lives: thematic investigations and the development of critical social studies. The Social Studies, 98(4), 165- 171.
• Kaiser, C. (2010). Redrawing the boundaries: a constructivist approach to combating student apathy in the secondary history classroom. The History Teacher, 43(2), 223-2 Retrieved from http://www.thehistoryteacher.org/
• Kalina, C. & Powell, K.C. (2009), Cognitive and social constructivism: developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130, 241-250. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/education.html
• Kerr, S. (1996). Visions of sugarplums: The future of technology, education, and the schools. In S. T. Kerr. (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling (pp. 1-27). National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Levy, H. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81 (4), 161-164.
• Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36.
• McBee, R. H. (2000). Why teachers integrate. The Educational Forum, 64, 254-260.
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• National Standards for Social Studies Teachers (2010). National Council for the Social Studies. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/teacherstandards
• Onosko, J. J. (1992). An approach to designing thoughtful units. The Social Studies, 83(5), 193-1
• Onosko, J. J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher-order thinking in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19(4), 341-366.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.
• Pederson, P. (2010). What is measured is treasured: The impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on nonassessed subjects. Clearing House: A Journal of Education Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 80, 287-291.
• Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Paul.
• Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10-18.
• Schmoker, M. (2006). Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers Press, Columbia University.
• Sheingold, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1). 17-27.
• Shernoff, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Stephens, P. (2007). Does integrated thematic instruction motivate and encourage culturally and linguistically diverse students in self-directed learning? Retrieved from Teachers Network website: http://www.teachersnetwork.org/tnli/research/stephens.pdf
• Tanner, L. (2008). No Child Left Behind is just the tip of the iceberg. The Social Studies, 99(1), 41-48.
• Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77-87.
• Tomlinson, C. (2000). Reconcilable differences? Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership. 58 (1), 6-11. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership.aspx
• Vars, G. & Beane, J. (2000). Integrative curriculum in a standards-based world. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EDO-PS-00-6)
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). The Development of Scientific Concepts in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• White, R. (1995). How thematic teaching can transform history instruction. The Clearing House 68(3), 160-162.
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72 (2), 131-175.
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
• Zhao, Y. & Hoge, J. (2010). What elementary students and teachers say about social studies. The Social Studies, 96, 216-221.