___

• Aderman, D. and Berkowitz, L. (1970). Observational set, empathy, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, pp. 141-148.
• Allport, G. W. and J. M. Ross. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5, pp. 423-43.
• Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. The Journal of Political Economy, 97, pp. 1447–1458.
• Andreoni, J., Brown, E. and Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable Giving by Married Couples Who Decides and Why Does It Matter? Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), pp. 111-133.
• Andreoni, J.and Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1, pp. 293–312.
• Anik, L., Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I. and Dunn, E. W. (2009). Feeling Good About Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior. Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper No. 10-012.
• Annis, L. V. (1976). Emergency helping and religious behavior. Psychological Reports, 39, pp. 151–158.
• Arcury, T.A. and Christianson E. H. (1993) Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Knowledge and Actions. The Journal of Environmental Education, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 19-25.
• Batson. C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 15(1), pp. 29-45.
• Batson, C. D. and Gray. R. A. (1981). Religious orientation and helping behavior: Responding to one’s own or to the victim’s needs’?
• Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 40(3), pp. 511-520.
• Batson, C. D. and Ventis. W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Becker, Gary S. (1974). “Theory of Social Interaction.” Journal of Political Economy 82(6). pp. 1064–1093.
• Belfield, C. R. and A. P. Beney. (2000). “What Determines Alumni Generosity? Evidence for the UK” Journal Education Economics, Vol. 8 Issue 1, pp. 65-80.
• Bendapaudi, N., S.N. Singh and V. Bendapaudi. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3): pp. 33-49.
• Bennett, R. (2003), Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8, pp. 12–29.
• Benson, P. L., Dehority, J., Garman, L., Hanson, E., Hochschwender, M., Leobold, C., Rohr, R., Sullivan, J. (1980), Intrapersonal correlates of nonspontaneous helping behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 110, pp. 87-95.
• Bernt, F. M. (1989). Being religious and being altruistic: A study of college service volunteers. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 10, Issue 6, pp. 663-669.
• Brendl, C. Miguel, Arthur B. Markman, and Claude Messner (2003). “The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated Choice Options,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), pp. 463-473.
• Brunel, Frederic F, Michelle R Nelson. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self” and “help-others” charity ad appeals: The mediating role of world-views. Journal of Advertising 29(3) pp. 15–28.
• Bryant, W. K., Jeon-Slaughter, H., Kang, H., and Tax, A. (2003). Participation in philanthropic activities: Donating money and time. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(1), pp. 43-73.
• Bussell, H., and Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), pp. 244-257.
• Carabain, C.L. and R. Bekkers, (2012). Explaining differences in philanthropic behavior between Christians, Muslims and Hindus in the Netherlands. Review of religious research., 53: pp. 419-440.
• Carroll, J., S. McCarthy and C. Newman, (2005). An econometric analysis of charitable donations in the republic of Ireland. Economic and Social Review 36(3): pp. 229-249.
• Chandran, S. and Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, pp. 375–389.
• Chau, L. L., Johnson, R. C., Bowers, J. K., Darvill, T. J., and Danko, G. P. (1990). Intrinsic and Extrinsic religiosity as related to conscience, adjustment, and altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, pp. 397-400.
• Chrenka, J., Gutter, M. S., and Jasper, C. (2003). Gender Differences in the Decision to Give Time or Money. Consumer Interests Annual, Vol. 40, pp. 1-4. 

• Clarke, P. and Mount, P. (2001). Nonprofit marketing: the key to marketing's ‘mid‐life crisis’? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 78-91.
• Coke, Jay S., C Daniel Batson, Katherine McDavis. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(7) 752.
• Correa, K.A., Stone, B. T., Stikic, M., Johnson, R. R. and Berka, C. (2015). Characterizing donation behavior from psychophysiological indices of narrative experience, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9:301.
• Danko, W. D. and Stanley, T. J. (1986). “Identifying and Reaching the Donation Prone Individual: A Nationwide Assessment”, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 2(1/2) 117-122.
• DeVoe, S. E. and Pfeffer, J. (2007). “When Time Is Money: The Effect of Hourly Payment on the valuation of Time,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 104(1) pp. 1-13.
• Dovidio, John F. (1984). “Helping Behavior and Altruism: An Empirical and Conceptual Overview,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 17, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press, 361–427.
• Dufwenberg, M., and Muren, A. (2006). Generosity, anonymity, gender. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61(1), 42-49.
• Eckel, C. C., and Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108(448), pp. 726-735.
• Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P.J. (2000). Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence. Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics, Charles Plott and Vernon L. Smith (Eds). New York: North Holland. 

• Eckel, C.C. and P.J. Grossman, 2004. Giving to secular causes by the religious and nonreligious: An experimental test of the responsiveness of giving to subsidies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2): 271-289.
• Eisenberg, N. and Miller, P.A. (1987) “The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviours” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 101(1) pp. 91-119.
• Flippen, Annette R., Harvey A. Hornstein, William E. Siegal, and Eben A. Weitzman (1996). A Comparison of Similarity and Interdependence as Trigger for In-Group Formation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (September), 882–93.
• Frey, K. P., and Eagly, A. H. (1993). Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), pp. 32–44.
• Gershon R. and Cryder, C. (2016). When Money Doesn’t Talk: Corporations Receive Less Credit For Monetary Donations, - Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 44, pp. 455-456.
• Glazer, Amihai, and Kai Konrad. (1996). “A Signaling Explanation for Charity.” American Economic Review 86:1019–1028.
• Gourville, J. T., (1998). Pennies-a-Day: The Effect of Temporal Reframing on Transaction Evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp. 395-408.
• Grau, S. and Folse, J.G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising ,36 (4): 19–33.
• Gwin, C.F. (2000). American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings, suppl. 2000 AMA Educators' Proceedings; Chicago Vol. 11, 348.
• Harris, M. B. and Huang, L. C. (1973). Helping and the attribution process. Journal of Social Psychology, 90, pp. 291-297.
• Hassay, D. N. and Peloza, J. (2007). A Typology of Charity Support Behaviors: Toward a Holistic View of Helping, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 17, 135-151.
• Herzog, A. R., Kahn, R. L., Morgan, J. N., Jackson, J. S., and Antonucci, T. C. (1989). Age differences in productive activities. Journal of Gerontology, 44(4), pp. 129-138.
• Hoge, D.R. and F. Yang, (1994). Determinants of religious giving in American denominations: Data from two nationwide surveys. Review of Religious Research 36(2).
• Hunsberger, B. and Platonow. E. (1986). Religion and helping charitable causes. The Journal of Psychology Vol. 120, Issue 6, pp. 517-528.
• Kitchen, H. and Dalton R. (1990). Determinants of Charitable Donation by Families in Canada: A Regional Analysis, Applied Economics, Vol. 22(3) pp. 285-299.
• Kogut, T. and I. Ritov. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3) pp. 157–167.

• Krebs, Dennis. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 32(6) 1134.
• Lee, Y.K. and C.T. Chang, (2007). Who gives what to charity? Characteristics affecting charitable donations. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(9): pp. 1173-1180.
• Leeds, Ruth, (1963). Altruism and the Norm of Giving, Merrill- Palmer Quarterly 9, pp. 229-239.
• List, J.A. and M.K. Price, (2009). The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69: pp. 160-169.
• Liu, W. and Aaker, J., (2008), Reflective versus transactional mindsets in donation requests: the “time-ask” effect, SCP 2008 Winter Conference.
• Macaulay, J.R. (1970). A Shill for Charity. Altruism and Helping Behavior. New York: Academic Press.
• McLeish, Barry, J. (1995). Successful Marketing Strategies for Nonprofit Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

• McPherson, J. M., and Rotolo, T. (1996). Testing a dynamic model of social composition: Diversity and change in voluntary groups. American Sociological Review, pp. 179-202.
• Mehrabian, A. and Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, pp. 525-543.
• Mesch, D. J., Brown, M. S., Moore, Z. I. and Hayat, A. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), pp. 342-355.

• Nelson, M.R., Brunel, F.F., Supphellen, M. and Manchanda, R.V. (2006) Effects of culture, gender, and moral obligations on responses to charity advertising across masculine and feminine cultures. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), pp. 45–56.
• Newman, R. (1996). Know your donor: gender differences in giving. Fund Raising Management, 27(5), pp. 31-32. 

• Nisbett, R.E. and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Nowell, C. and Tinkler, S. (1994). The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Behavior and Organization, Vol. 25, pp.25-36. 

• Peltier, James, Schibrowsky, John, and Schultz, Don (2002). Leveraging Customer Information to Develop Sequential Communication Strategies: A Case Study of Charitable Giving Behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, July-August, pp. 23-33. 

• Pew Research Center. (2012). The Global Religious Landscape. Retrieved from: http://www. pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global‐religious‐landscape‐exec/, accessed 12–4‐16.
• Pope, J. A., Isely, E. S. and Tutu, F. A., (2009). Developing a Marketing Strategy for Nonprofit Organizations: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 21, Issue 2, 184-201.
• Radley, A. and M. Kennedy (1995). Charitable giving by individuals: A study of attitudes and practices. Human Relations, Vol. 48, pp. 685-710. 

• Reitsma, J., P. Scheepers and M.T. Grotenhuis, (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross-national effect differences in European countries. Review of religious research, 47(4): pp. 347-362.
• Repoport, A. (1988). Provision of Step-level Public Goods; Effect of Inequality in Resources, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54 pp. 432-440.
• Sablosky, R. (2014). Does religion foster generosity? The Social Science Journal, 51, pp. 545-555.
• Sargeant Adrian, John B. Ford, Douglas C. West. (2006). Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behaviour, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, Issue 2, pp. 155-165.
• Sargeant, A. (1999). Charitable giving: Towards a model of donor behaviour, Journal of Marketing Management, 15, pp. 215–238.
• Scheepers, P. and M.T. Grotenhuis, (2005). Who cares for the poor in Europe? European Sociological Review, 21(5): pp. 453-465.
• Schibrowsky, J.A. and Peltier, J.W. (1995). Decision frames and direct marketing offers: a field study in a fundraising context. Journal of Direct Marketing, 9(1), pp. 8–16.
• Schlegelmilch, B.B., A. Diamantopoulos and A. Love, (1997). Characteristics affecting charitable donations: empirical evidence from Britain, Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science 3(1): pp. 14-28.
• Sherman S. J., Beike D. R., Ryalls, K. R., (1999). Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guiford Press.
• Sherry, John F. (1983). Gift-Giving in Anthropological Perspective, Journal of Consumer Research. 10, pp. 157-168.
• Simmons, W. O., and Emanuele, R. (2007). Male-female giving differentials: are women more altruistic? Journal of Economic Studies, 34(6), pp. 534-550.
• Small, D.A. and Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), pp. 5–16.
• Small, D. A. and Nicole M. Verrochi (2009). The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements, Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (6), pp. 777–87.
• Smith, Scott M.,(1980). Giving to Charitable Organizations: A Behavioral Review and a Framework for Increasing Commitment, in Advances in Consumer Research, Jerry Olson (ed.). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 753-743.
• Sober, E. (1988). What is Evolutionary Altruism, Canadian Journal on Philosophy, Vol. 14, pp. 75- 99.
• Sundeen, R. A., and Raskoff, S. A. (1994). Volunteering among teenagers in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(4), pp. 383-403.
• Taylor, S.E. and Thompson, S. (1982). Stalking the Elusive “Vividness” Effect. Psychological Review, 89, pp.155-191.
• Tversky A., D. Kahneman, (1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice, Science, Vol. 211, Issue 4481, pp. 453-458.
• Watson, P. I., Hood, R. W., Morris, R. J. and Hall. J. R. (1984). Empathy. religious orientation and social desirability. The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 117, Issue 2, pp. 211-216.
• Wiepking, P., and Breeze, B. (2012). Feeling poor, acting stingy: The effect of money perceptions on charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(1), pp. 13-24.

• Winterich, K. P., and Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, Issue 2, pp. 274-293.
• Women's Philanthropy Institute, the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. (2010). Women Give 2010. 

• Women's Philanthropy Institute, the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. (2014). Women Give 2014.
• Yao, Kimberly, (2015). Who Gives? The Determinants of Charitable Giving, Volunteering, and Their Relationship. Wharton Research Scholars Journal. Paper 126.
• Yen, S. T. (2002). An Econometric Analysis of Household Donations in the USA. Applied Economic Letters, 9, pp. 837-41.
• Giving USA, https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2019-americans-gave-427-71-billion-to-charity-in-2018-amid-complex-year-for-charitable-giving