Attitudes of Students towards Violations of Academic Integrity in Online English Courses

Attitudes of Students towards Violations of Academic Integrity in Online English Courses

Online education became widespread during the Covid pandemic and is likely to continue to have an important role in our education into the future. A notable aspect of the shift from traditional classroom to virtual teaching has been the collegiate challenge of extending a learning environment founded on mutual trust and academic endeavor, remotely. This study examines the attitudes of students towards violations of academic integrity in online English courses, as attitude can be a trigger for behavior. Student attitudes concerning cheating were assessed for exams, assignments and online sessions. To this end, a questionnaire was implemented with faculty and vocational school students located in the west of Turkey. The participants were two groups of students who attended online English courses and delivered online assignments. One of the groups was comprised of faculty students who attended traditional exams while the other group was tested online. The attitudes of both groups were compared and the results indicated similarity in the most and the least frequently preferred behaviors in general. The most frequently acknowledged violations were using a dictionary during online exams, getting help from translation websites for online assignments and pretending to attend online courses with the camera or microphone turned off. On the other hand, students didn’t show willingness to use remote connection software or give account details to a friend to get help in online courses. Although, students in both groups had similar attitudes towards academic misconduct, some item-based differences were revealed that may influence the delivery of language courses in the online setting.

___

  • Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(2), 151-170.
  • Ahmadi, A. (2014). Plagiarism in the academic context: A study of Iranian EFL learners. Research Ethics, 10(3), 151-168.
  • Alhaisoni, E., & Alhaysony, M. (2017). An investigation of Saudi EFL university students’ attitudes towards the use of Google Translate. International Journal of English Language Education, 5(1), 72-82. URL: http://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v5i1.10696
  • Alharbi, A. T. (2019). An Experience of Using Computer Technology in the ESL Classroom. Multi-Knowledge Electronic Comprehensive Journal for Education & Science Publications (MECSJ), 27, 1-15.
  • Agustine, I., & Permatasari, K. M. (2021). Students’ Attitude on the Use of Machine Translation in Japanese Language Class. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2557-2564. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1461
  • Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017
  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.
  • Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2020). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 182, 196-211. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3691363 Best, W. J., & Khan, V. J. (1998). Research in education (8th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bista, K. (2011). Academic dishonesty among international students in higher education. To Improve the Academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 30(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2011.tb00655.x
  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
  • Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer.
  • Christensen Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Understanding Academic Misconduct. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/ 10.47678/cjhe.v36i1.183525. Christensen, K. M. (2011). Attitudes of and Behaviors Towards Academic Integrity Between Community College Students Who Enroll in Online Courses Versus Traditional Courses Doctor of Philosophy [Doctoral Dissertation, Old Dominion University]. ODU Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1096&context=efl_etds
  • Clifford, J., Merschel, L., & Munné, J. (2013). Surveying the landscape: what is the role of machine translation in language learning?. @ tic. revista d'innovació educativa, 10, 108-121. https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.10.2228. Çelik, Ö., & Lancaster, T. (2021). Violations of and threats to academic integrity in online English language teaching. The Literacy Trek, 7(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.932316. Çolak, M. K., & Glendinning, I. (2021). Embracing community-building in online classes to promote academic integrity. The Literacy Trek, 7(1), 5-33.
  • Dağtaş, A., & Şahinkarakaş, Ş. (2019). The experience of uncertainty in foreign language learning within dynamic systems framework. Folklor/edebiyat, 25(97), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.943. Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T. B. (2011). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ellis, C., Mason, J., & Dunn, A. (2021). Contract cheating: An increasing challenge for global academic community arising from COVID-19. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(24), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00166-8. Eminoğlu E., & Nartgün, Z. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik sahtekarlık eğilimlerinin ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 217-240. https://www.insanbilimleri.com
  • European Communities. (2006). Key competences for lifelong learning: European reference.
  • Farisi, I. M. (2013). Academic dishonesty in distance higher education: Challenges and Models for Moral Education in the Digital Era. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 176-195. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1042597.pdf
  • Fernandez, J. (2019). The effects of parental pressure and peer pressure on the academic dishonesty of college students during examinations. College Academic Skills in English. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20590.36164
  • Goh, E. (2015). Exploring underlying motivations behind extreme cases of plagiarism in tourism and hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(2), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2015.1033101
  • Greenwald, A. G. (1989). Why are the attitudes important ?. In A. R. Pratkanis & S.J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude, Sturucture and Function (pp.1-11). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://faculty.washington .edu/agg/pdf/Greenwald.AS& F . 1 9 8 9.Chs1&17.pdf
  • Grijalva, T. C., Kerkvliet, J., & Nowell, C. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40(1). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/61609683/Academic_Honesty_and_Online_Courses20191226-91989-1v2m650.pdf
  • Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2021). A ghostwriter in the machine? Attitudes of academic staff towards machine translation use in internationalized higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100957
  • Hanum, N. S. (2017). The importance of classroom interaction in the teaching of reading in junior high school. Malang, Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Malang. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/267023845.pdf
  • Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitudes and cheating towards plagiarism: University case study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 748-757. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2014.748.757
  • International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI). (2021). https://academicintegrity.org/
  • Janke, S., Rudert, C. S., Peterson, A., Fritz, M. T., & Daumiller, M. (2021). Cheating in the wake of COVID-19: How dangerous is ad-hoc online testing for academic integrity?. Computers and Education Open, 2, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100055
  • Kenzig, M. J. (2015). Lost in translation: adapting a face-to-face course into an online learning experience. Health promotion practice, 16(5), 625-628.
  • Küçüktepe, S. E. (2014). College students’ cheating behaviors. Social Behavior And Personality, 42, 101-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S101
  • Lamuna, S.P. (2017). Students’ understanding, perceptions and experience of plagiarism: A case study of the University of Kwazulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg Campus [Master’s Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal]. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/xmlui/handle/10413/14503
  • Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: A Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
  • Liao, M. T., & Tseng, C. Y. (2010). Students' Behaviors and Views of Paraphrasing and Inappropriate Textual Borrowing in an EFL Academic Setting. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 187-211.
  • Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A selfreport study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevion, L. K. (2003). Faculty and academic integrity: The influence of current honor codes and past honor code experiences. Research In Higher Education, 44(3). 367-385. https://www.jstor.org /stable/pdf/40197309. pdf? ref reqid =excelsior%3Ad321e7235ca7abac595ef51edb8a4f20
  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/14
  • Mebratu, M. B. (2016). The nature, causes and practices of academic dishonesty/cheating in higher education: The case of Hawassa University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(19), 14-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1109249.pdf
  • Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2013). State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(1). 50-71. https://doi.org./ 10.5281/zenodo.3482941
  • Osipov, I. V., Prasikova, A. Y., & Volinsky, A. A. (2015). Participant behavior and content of the online foreign languages learning and teaching platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 476-488.
  • Parnther, C. (2021). Academic misconduct in higher Education: A comprehensive review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 1(1), 25-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.1.25
  • Polat, M. (2017). Why do students cheat in examinations in Turkey? A meta‐synthesis study. Journal of Educational Sicences Research, 7(1), 203-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2017.71.7
  • Rahman, M. M. (2014). Learning English through interaction in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Languages and Literatures, (2)2. 203-217. http://ijll-net.com/journals /ijll/Vol_2_No_2_J u ne _2014/12.pdf
  • Rehman, R. R., & Waheed, A. (2014). Ethical perception of university students about academic dishonesty in Pakistan: Identification of student’s dishonest acts. The Qualitative Report, 19(7), 1-13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043547.pdf
  • Saleh, A.M., & Meccawy, Z. (2021). EFL female students’ perceptions towards cheating in distance. English Language Teaching, 14(1). 29-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n1p29
  • Salleh, M. I. M., Alias, R. N., Hamid, A. H., & Yusaoff, Z. (2013). Academic dishonesty among undergraduates in the higher education. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(2), 222-227. https://www.academia.edu/7645508/Academic_ Dishonesty _among _ Undergraduates_in_the_Higher_Education
  • Singh, H., & Bennington, A. J. (2012). Faculty on the frontline: Predicting faculty intentions to address college student plagiarism. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16(4), 115-128. Tauginienė, L., Gaižauskaitė, I., Glendinning, I., Kravjar, J., Ojsteršek, M., Ribeiro, L., Odiņeca, T., Marino, F., Cosentino, M., Sivasubramaniam, S., & Foltýnek, T. (2018). Glossary for academic integrity. European Network for Academic Integrity. https://www.academicintegrity.eu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Glossary_revised_final.pdf Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00343
  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3). 235-274. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023 / A:1018 724900565.pdf
  • Wuensch, K. L., Aziz, S., Ozan, E., Kishore, M., & Tabrizi, M. (2006). Pedagogical characteristics of online and face-to-face classes. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2422-2429). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Yu, R. (2008). Interaction in EFL classes. Asian Social Science, 4(4), 48-50. https://pdfs.semanticscholar .org/c1da/426f946e0d36b0d113f297c2f6318b959bb8.pdf