___

• Adigüzel, T., Gürbulak, N., & Sariçayir, H. (2011). Akıllı Tahtalar Ve Öğretim Uygulamaları/Smart Boards And Their Instructional Uses. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15).
• Akarsu, O., & Darıyemez, T. (2014). The reading habits of university students studying English language and literature in the digital age. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 85-99.
• Akıncı, A., Kurtoğlu, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2012). Bir teknoloji politikası olarak Fatih Projesinin başarılı olması için yapılması gerekenler: Bir durum analizi çalışması. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 1-3.
• Ateş, M. (2010). Ortaöğretim coğrafya derslerinde akilli tahta kullanimi. Marmara coğrafya dergisi, (22).
• Bax, S. (2000). Putting technology in its place: ICT in modern foreign language teaching. In K. Field (Ed.), Issues in modern foreign language teaching (pp. 199-210). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
• Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help?. Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf..
• Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution: Teaching with IWBs. Victoria: ACER Press. Retrieved from http://schoolnet.org.za/CoL/ACE/course/classroom/documents/iwb_revolution.pdf
• Bilgen, A. (2012). Chalk vs. tablet: Can FATIH Project revolutionize the Turkish education system. The European Strategists.
• Bonifaz, A., & Zucker, A. (2004). Lessons learned about providing laptops for all students. Boston, MA: Development Center, Inc. & Northeast and the Islands Regional Technology in Education Consortium.
• Coyle, Y., Yañez, L., & Verdú, M. (2010). The impact of the interactive whiteboard on the teacher and children’s language use in an ESL immersion classroom. System, 38(4), 614-625. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.10.002
• Çelik, S., Arkın, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL learners' use of ICT for self-regulated learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(2), pp-98.
• Çiftçi, S., Taşkaya, S. M., & Alemdar, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin FATİH Projesine ilişkin görüşleri The opinions of classroom teachers about Fatih Project. İlköğretim Online, 12(1).
• Daşdemir, İ., Cengiz, E., Uzoğlu, M., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2012). Tablet Bilgisayarların Fen Ve Teknoloji Derslerinde Kullanılmasıyla İlgili Fen Ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi/Examınatıon Of Scıence Teachers' Opınıons Related To Tablet Pcs Usıng In Scıence And Technology Courses. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20).
• Demir, S. B., & Yorulmaz, E. (2014). Tarih derslerinde akıllı tahta kullanım durumunun incelenmesi (Bir durum çalışması). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (28), 15-38.
• Ekici, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2013). FATİH Projesi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339.
• Ekşi, G., & Yakışık, B. Y. (2015). An Investigation of Prospective English Language Teachers’ Multimodal Literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 464-471.
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
• Fri-tic. (2012). Projet One to One iPad: Visite de l’Institut international de Lancy. Retrieved July 11, 2012 from http:// www.fri-tic.ch/dyn/bin/45214-46185-1-fritic_visite_ onetoone_lancy_v2.pdf.
• Gateway. (2004). One-to-One laptop initiatives: Providing tools for 21stcentury learners. Folsom, CA: Center for Digital Education
• Gerard, F., Greene, M., & Widener, J. (1999). Using SMART Board in Foreign Language Classes.
• Gérard, F., & Widener, J. (1999). A SMARTer way to teach foreign language: The SMART board interactive whiteboard as a language learning tool. Retrieved August, 23, 2010.
• Hsieh, H. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
• Ingram, D., Willcutt, J., & Jordan, K. (2008). Laptop initiative evaluation report. University of Minnesota: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
• Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The Use of Tablets Distributed within the Scope of FATIH Project for Education in Turkey (Is FATIH Project a Fiasco or a Technological Revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442-450.
• Johnson, E. M., Ramanair, J., & Brine, J. (2010). ‘It’s not necessary to have this board to learn English, but it’s helpful’: Student and teacher perceptions of interactive whiteboard use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 199-212. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.513444
• Jung Won Hur & Suhyun Suh (2012) Making Learning Active with Interactive Whiteboards, Podcasts, and Digital Storytelling in ELL Classrooms, Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 29:4, 320-338, DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2012.734275
• Kim, J. H-Y., & Jung, H-Y. (2010). South Korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools, 27(3-4), 247-265.
• Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, Vol 11(3), 130-151.
• Lesardoises. (2012). Les tablettes dans l’éducation la Thaïlande. Retrieved July 12, 2012 from http://lesardoises. com/11123/les-tablettes-dans-leducation-la-thailande-franchit-le-pas-pour-328-millions-de-dollars.html.
• Lewin, C., & Luckin, R. (2010). Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK. Computers & Education, 54(3), 749-758.
• Liu, T.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 515–527.
• Massé, O. (2012) Rapport au sujet de l’expérimentation de l’académie de Bordeaux sur l’usage des tablettes tactiles en français. Bordeaux: IA IPR.
• Millum, T., & Warren, C. (2014). Sharing not staring: 21 interactive whiteboard lessons for the English classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• MoNE (2012a) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı FATİH Projesi. Retrieved from: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr
• MoNE. (2017) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı FATİH Projesi. Retrieved from: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda/
• MoNE. (2012b). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Milli Eğitim istatistikleri. Retrieved from: http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik/meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2011_2012.pdf
• MoNE (2010). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, FATİH Projesi: Fırsatları Artırma ve Teknolojiyi İyileştirme Hareketi. Retrieved from: http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr
• Moss, G., Jewitt, Carrey, L, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The interactive whiteboards pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the schools whiteboard expansion (SWE) project: London Challenge. Institute of Education, University of London. Research report no: 816.
• Öz, H. (2014). Teachers’ And Students’ Perceptions Of Interactive Whiteboards in The English as a Foreign Language Classroom The Turkish. Online Journal of Educational Technology – July 2014, volume 13 issue 3
• Öztan, A. C. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde akıllı tahta kullanımının ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerininakademik başarılarına etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, TÜRKİYE.
• Pamuk, S., Çakır, R., Ergun, M., Yılmaz, H.B., Ayas, C. (2013). "The use of tablet PC and interactive board from the perspectives of teachers and students: evaluation of the FATİH project" Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822. 2013 - See more at: http://acikerisim.sinop.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11486/758?show=full#sthash.pJMgY2OT.dpuf
• Pennington, M. C (1996). The power of CALL. Houston, TX: Athelstan Publications.
• Peterson, M. (2011). Towards a research agenda for the use of three-dimensional virtual worlds in language learning. Calico Journal, 29(1), 67-80.
• Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258-284.
• Pouezevara, S., Dinçer, A., Kipp, S., & Sarışık, Y. (2013). Turkey's FATIH project: A plan to conquer the digital divide or a technological leap of faith. Turkey: RTI International & Education Reform Initiative (ERI).
• Sakız, G., Özden, B., Aksu, D., & Şimşek, Ö. (2014). Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde akıllı tahta kullanımının öğrenci başarısına ve dersin işlenişine yönelik tutuma etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(3), 257-274.
• Savas, P. (2014). Tablet PCs as instructional tools in English as a foreign language education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1).
• Shenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2008). From ‘bored’ to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3), 129–136.
• Tamim, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Bernard, R. M. (2015). Large-scale, government-supported educational tablet initiatives.
• Thomas, M., & Schmid, E. C. (Eds.) (2010). Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: IGI Global.
• Uluyol, Ç. (2013). ICT integration in Turkish schools: Recall where you are coming from to recognise where you are going to. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1).
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 1, 2012 from http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/ technology/netp-2010/.
• Van Dusen, G. (2000). Digital dilemma: Issues of access, cost, and quality in media enhanced and distance education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(5), 1–120.
• Widener, J., Greene, M. & Gérard, F. (1999). Using SMART Board in Foreign Language Classes. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 1268-1273). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K., (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
• Yang, J. Y., & Teng, Y.W. (2014). Perceptions of elementary school teachers and students using interactive whiteboards in English teaching and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(1), 125-154.
• Yáñez, L., & Coyle, Y. (2011). Children’s perceptions of learning with an interactive whiteboard. ELT Journal, 65(4), 446-457. http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq069
• Yorgancı, S., & Terzioğlu, Ö. (2013). Matematik öğretiminde akıllı tahta kullanımının başarıya ve matematiğe karşı tutuma etkisi.. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(3), 919-930.