Şiirdeki metaforun çevirisi: Le Bateau Ivre'e ve Türkçe çevirisine bilişsel bir yaklaşım

Lakoff ve Johnson (1980), metaforun sadece edebi sanat olmadığını, daha çok kavramsallaştırma için bir araç olduğunu açıklayarak metafor çalışmalarına bilişsel bir bakış açısı kazandırmıştır. Bu görüşe göre, metafor insan zihninde farklı bağlam türlerinde kaynak alan ve hedef alana göre kavramsallaştırılır. Bu çalışma, Kaynak Dil (SL) ve Erek Dildeki (TL) metaforlar arasındaki kavramsal haritalamayı araştırmayı ve kavramsal değişimin alanlar arasında nasıl olduğunu açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, Arthur Rimbaud'un (1854-1891) şiiri "Le Bateau Ivre" ve bu şiirin Sabahattin Eyuboğlu (1908-1973) tarafından yapılmış olan Türkçe çevirisi, metafor çevirilerinin bilişsel bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirildiği Mandelblit'in (1995) Bilişsel Çeviri Hipotezi çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Al-Hasnawi’nin (2007) bu hipoteze eklediği bir şemaya da çalışmanın analizinde yer verilmiştir. Araştırmacı tarafından amaçlanan sonuç, metafora çeviride kavramsallaştırılmış bilişsel bir figür olarak dikkat çekmek ve metaforun kaynak ve erek dilde bilişsel bir bakış açısıyla analiz etme, anlama ve yorumlama boyutlarını ortaya çıkarmaktır.

Translating the metaphor in poetry: A cognitive approach to Le Bateau Ivre and its translation in Turkish

Lakoff and Johnson (1980) gave a cognitive point of view to metaphor study explaining that metaphor is not amere literary stylistic device, rather a tool for conceptualization. According to this view, metaphors areconceptualized in man’s mind with regard to source domain and target domain in different types of context. Thisstudy is an attempt to investigate the conceptual mapping between the metaphors in Source Language (SL) andTarget Language (TL) and explain how the conceptual shift occurs between the domains. In order to do so, themetaphors in the poem “Le Bateau Ivre” by Arthur Rimbaud (1854-1891) and their translations in Turkish bySabahattin Eyuboğlu (1908-1973) are investigated within the framework of Mandelblit’s (1995) CognitiveTranslation Hypothesis in which the translations of the metaphors are evaluated from a cognitive perspective. Aschema added by Al-Hasnawi (2007) to this hypothesis is also included in the analysis of the present study. Theconclusion aimed at by the researcher is to turn focus to metaphor as a conceptualized cognitive figure intranslation and to unearth the dimensions of analysis, comprehension and interpretation of metaphor in sourceand target language with a cognitive perspective.

PDF

___

Ak, M. (2012). Mehmet Akif ve Necip Fazıl şiiri merkezinde edebiyat ve düşüncede nehir metaforu. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosya1 Bilimler Enstitüsü, (19), 209-224.
A. R. (2007). A cognitive approach to translating metaphors. Translation Journal, 11(3). Retrieved on December 15, 2015 from http://translationjournal.net/journal/41metaphor.htm
Akgül, A. (2005). Oktay Rıfat şiirinde Güneş’in üç hâli (Published Master Thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
Bengi, I. (1992). Şiir çevirisini yönlendiren kısıtlamalar: bir yöntem önerisi için bazı notlar. Dilbilim Araştırmaları. Retrieved on November 20, 2015 from http://dad.boun.edu.tr/article/download/5000129471/5000118675
Boer, E (2003). The Frequency of Original Metaphors and Texts. Retrieved on December 20, 2015 from www.woordenboer.nl/metafoor/paper.htm.
Bulut, A. (2012). Translating political metaphors: conflict potential of zenci [negro] in TurkishEnglish. Translators’ Journal, 57 (4), 909-923.
Burmakova, E. and Marugina, N (2014). Cognitive approach to metaphor translation in poetry. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154 (2014), 527-533.
Chakhachiro, R. (2011). Translating irony: An interdisciplinary approach. Sayyab Books: London.
Dur, F. (2006). Understanding metaphor: A cognitive approach focusing on identification and interpretation of metaphors in poetry (Published Master Thesis). Çukurova University, Adana.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2015). Retrieved on January 4, 2016 from http://www.britannica.com/
Ghazala, H. (2011). Cognitive stylistics and the translator. Sayyab Books: London.
İspirli, Ö.L. (2014). Almanca ve Türkçe’de eğretileme süreci (Published Doctoral Dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara.
Kövecses, Z. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., Turner M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Maalej, Z. (2008). Translating metaphor between unrelated cultures: A cognitive pragmatic perspective. Sayyab Translation Journal, (1), 61-82.
Mandelblit, N. (1995). The cognitive view of metaphor and its implications for translation theory. Translation and Meaning, 3, 483 − 495.
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2005). Metaphor meets typology: ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 (1), 207-246.
Schaeffner, C. (2003). Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (7), 1253- 1269.
Schäffner, C. (2004). Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1253-1269.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge: London & New York.
Stockwell, P. (2002a). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge: London & New York.
Van den Broeck, R. (1981). The limits of translatability exemplified by metaphor translation. Poetics Today, 2(4), 73-87.
Verdonk, P. (1999). The liberation of the icon: A brief survey from classical rhetoric to cognitive stylistics. Journal of Literary Studies, 15(3/4), 291-304.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in culturespecific configurations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yardımcı, E. U. and Bal, M. (2015). Türk çocuk şiirlerinde anne metaforu. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 3 (1), 1-16.
Youssefi, K. (2009). An analysis of the translation of metaphors in Hafız’s selected poems (Published doctoral dissertation). Sains Malaysia University.
Yurina, E. A, Borovkova, A. & Shenkal, G. (2015). Cross-languages figurativeness in translator's speech (based on the Russian translation of Turkish novel «The Black Book» by Orhan Pamuk). Language and Culture, 200, 579-586.