Giyoto Giyoto, Novianni Anggraini, Elen Inderasari, Luthfie Arguby Purnomo

Konuşmacının konuşmalarını sürdürme stratejisini “hangi cinsiyet ve statüden bahsediyor” nasıl yönetiyor?

Konuşmacıların konuşmalarında kültürel ve sosyal açıdan kabul edilen stratejilerine karar vermelerinde “hangi cinse ve sosyal statüye" karşı konuştukları konuşmacının kimliğinden daha çok hâkim olur. Bu kulenin pilotun iniş stratejisini belirlemesine benzer. Konuşma analizi hakkimdaki bu makale Müslümanların resmi konuşmalarında izleyicilerin cinsiyet ve sosyal statüsünün konuşmacının konuşma eylemi ve hareketlerini nasıl belirlediğini güçlü, görevlendirici, vurgulayıcı, kibar 107 talimattan oluşan üç fonksiyonel konuya bağlı ünitede ve 103 başlatma, yanıt ve takıp eylemiyle anlatıyor. Bulgular tüm kadın öğrenciler için kendi sosyal gücünü daha fazla emredici eylem ve başlatma hareketi kullanarak konuşmayı bir erkeğin başlattığı ve kontrol ettiğini gösteriyor. Yüksek statüdeki kadın karşısında düşük erkek onaylayıcı veyanıtlayıcı olurken kadın konuşmacılar dinleyicileri cinsiyet ve sosyal statüsünün bakmaksızın iletişim ve sosyal beraberliği korumak için onaylayıcı eylerler ve yanıtları kullanıyor. Bulgular konuşma stratejisini tanımlamaktan çok kimin konuştuğunun dah çok hayati önem taşıdığına işaret ediyor.

How does “to what gender and status one talks” govern the speaker’s strategy in keeping on their conversation?

“To what gender and status one talks” governs more the speaker, in deciding their culturally and socially acceptedstrategy in conversation, than “who talks”; as the airport runway dictates the pilot’s landing strategy. This paper,employing conversational analysis, tries to explore how the gender and social status of the audience dictate thespeaker’s speech acts and moves in Muslim formal conversation in three functional topical units composed of 107acts of directive, assertive, commisive, expressive, rogative, and 103 moves of initiations, responses, and followups. The finding shows that, to all female students, a male initiates and controls the conversation for materializinghis social power by having more directive acts and initiation moves. To the high female, Low male uses assertiveand response. While the female, regardless the social status and gender of the audience, uses assertive acts andresponse moves to support the interaction and social togetherness. The findings imply that the object to whom onetalks is more crucial in describing the conversation strategy.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

PDF

___

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Baker, P. (2013). Introduction: Virtual Special Issue of Gender and Language on Corpus Approaches. Gender and Language, 1(1).
Baslow, S.A. and Rubenfeld, K. (2003). “Trouble Talks”: Effect of Gender and Gender-Typing. Sex Roles, 48(2/4).
Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, Language, and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), pp. 941–931.
Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men, and Language. London: Longman.
Eakins, B. W. and Eakins, R. (1978). Sex Differences in Human Communication. Boston: Houghton Milfflin.
Erickson, B. Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., and O’Barr, W. (1978). Speech Style and Impression Formation in a Court Setting: The Effects of Powerful and Powerless Speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(2), pp. 266–279.
Gill, V.T., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Explaining Illness: Patients’ Proposals and Physicians responses. In J. Heritage & D.W. Maynard (Eds.). Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients (pp. 115-150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giyoto. (2013). Sociolinguistics Measure For Paternal Gender Dominance Over maternal One Among Javanese Muslims. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2(3).
Gunnarsson, B. (1997). “Women and men in the academic discourse community”. In Kotthoff, H. and Wodak, R. (Eds.), Communicating gender in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (2003). The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Itakura, H. (2000). “Describing conversational dominance”. In T Stivers, J, Steensig & l. Mondada (Eds.). The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp. 29-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Limited.
Myaskovisky, L., Unikel, E., and Dew, A. (2005). Effect of Gender Diversity on Performance and Interpersonal Behavior in Small Work Groups. Sex Roles, 52(9/10).
Nyamekye, E. and Yarney, S. (2015). Social and Cultural Perceptions on Women’s Education RW and Physical Embodiment on Their Ability to Wield Power over Men: The Yendi Experience in Northern Ghana. International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies, 3(2), pp.143-155.
Perakyla, A, Antaki, C., Vehvilainen, S. & Leuder, I. (2008). Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnel, J. and Stives, T. (1969). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. West Sussex: Wiley Balckwell Publishing.
Sinclair, J. McH & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, L., and and Dykann, A. (2010). Do Men Speak The Same Language Differently? Investigating the effect of Gender and Language Use. University of Colorado Boulder.
Stevens, K, Lehmann, N. (2008). Battle of the Sexes: Differences in Directness of Communication between Men and Women in a Group Situation. Capital University’s Undergraduate Research Journal, 3.
Swacker, M. (1979). “Women”s Verbal Behavior at Learned and Professional Conferences’. In Dubois, Betty-Lou and Crouch, Isobel (Eds.). The Sociology of the Languages of American Women. San Antonio: Trinity University.
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine.
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (1995). Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford U niversity Press.
Wardhaugh, R. (1993). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.
Wheelan, S. A. and Verdi, A. (1992). Differences in Male and Female Patterns of Communication in Groups: A Methodological Artifact? Sex Roles, 27(1/2).
Zimmerman, W. and. (1983). “Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons”. In Barrie Thome, Cheris Kramarae and Nancy Henley, (Eds.), Language, gender and society. Cambridge: MA Newbury House.
Zimmerman, W. and. (1998). “Women”s place in everyday talk: reflections on parent- child interaction’. In Coates, Jennifer (Eds.). Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.