CEFR and Eye Movement Characteristics during EFL Reading: The Case of Intermediate Readers

Bu çalışma öncelikle yabancı dilde okuma seviyesi ve göz hareketleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi ve göz takip tekniğini kullanarak ADOÇ seviyeleri (B1-B2) arasındaki okuma becerisi açısından göz hareketlerini tanımlamayı amaçlamaktadır. 57 yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenen katılımcı 2 deneysel ortamda test edilmiştir: Doğal okuma ve izole cümle uyarıcıları. Her iki deneyin sonuçları ortaya çıkarmıştır ki total fixation süresi ve first pass süresi dil seviyesi tarafından önemli derecede belirlenirken, second pass ve single fixation süreleri uyarıcı endekslidir. Dahası, her iki deneyde de B2 seviyesindeki öğrenciler B1 öğrencilerine nazaran daha az total fixation, first pass ve second pass oranları harcamışlardır. Bulgular göstermiştir ki göz hareketi özellikleri okuma becerisinin gelişmesiyle birlikte farklılık göstermektedir. Bunun yanı sıra gelecekte öğrencilerin okuma davranışlarının çevrimiçi gözlemlenebilmesi için göz takip tekniğinin eğitim amaçlı kullanımının üzerinde durulmuştur.

Yabancı Dil olarak İngilizce Okuma Sürecinde ADOÇ ve Göz Hareketleri Özellikleri: Orta Seviye Okuyucular

This study primarily aims to (1) examine the relationship between foreign language reading proficiency and eye movements during reading, and (2) to describe eye movement differences between two CEFR proficiency groups (B1 and B2) by using eye tracking technique. 57 learners of EFL were tested under two experimental conditions: Natural L2 reading and isolated sentence stimulus. The results revealed that total fixation duration and first pass time were predicted significantly by L2 reading proficiency in both experiments while second pass time and single fixation duration were found to be stimulus sensitive. Furthermore, B2 learners were observed to have less total fixation, first pass and second pass time and rate in both experiments when compared to B1 learners. The findings confirmed that characteristics of eye movements change as L2 reading skill develops. The use of eye tracking technique in future language classrooms to observe L2 learner reading development was also discussed.

___

  • Anglin, J. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 238, 58.
  • Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 639-647.
  • Blythe, H. I., Häikiö, T., Bertam, R., Liversedge, S. P., & Hyönä, J. (2011). Reading disappearing text: Why do children refixate words?. Vision research, 51(1), 84-92.
  • Buswell, G. T. (1922). Fundamental reading habits: a study of their development. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
  • Carver, R. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 413-37.
  • Clifton, C., Staub ,A., & Rayner, K. ( 2007 ). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In R. P. G. Van Gompel , M. H. Fischer , W. S. Murray , & R. L. Hill(Eds.), Eye-movements: A window on mind and brain, 241 - 372, Oxford : Elsevier Science.
  • Cunningham, A. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary, 45-68). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Eden, G. F., Stein, J. F., Wood, M. H., & Wood, F. B. (1995). Verbal and visual problems in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(5), 272-290.
  • Elterman, R. D., Abel, L. A., Daroff, R. B., Dell'Osso, L. F., & Bornstein, J. L. (1980). Eye movement patterns in dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 16-21.
  • Ferraro, F. R., & Sturgill, D. (1998). Lexical effects and lexical properties associated with National Adult Reading Test (NART) stimuli in healthy young adults and healthy elderly adults. Journal of clinical psychology, 54(5), 577-584.
  • Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21(2), 175-198.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 113(2), 256.
  • Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An Eye for Words. Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(03), 483-517.
  • Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J. H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2).
  • Grabe, W. (2010). Reading in a Second Language (Cambridge Applied Linguistics) Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.
  • Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, 313-334.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439.
  • Joseph, H. S., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 49(16), 2078-2086.
  • Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1312.
  • Juhasz, B., & Pollatsek, A. (2011). Lexical influences on eye movements in reading. The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements, 873-893.
  • Kim, E., Montrul, S., & Yoon, J. (2015). The on-line processing of binding principles in second language acquisition: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1-58.
  • Koban-Koç, D. (2016). The role of gender in reading comprehension: An analysis of college level EFL students' comprehension of different genres. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 3(3). 218-227.
  • Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. In K. Koda (Ed.), Reading and language learning- Special issue of Language Learning Supplement, 57, 1-44.
  • Liu, P. L. (2014). Using eye tracking to understand the responses of learners to vocabulary learning strategy instruction and use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 330-343.
  • Martos, F. J., & Vila, J. (1990). Differences in eye movements control among dyslexic, retarded and normal readers in the Spanish population. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 175-188.
  • Martyniuk, W. (2010). Aligning tests with the CEFR: Reflections on using the Council of Europe's draft manual (Vol. 33). Cambridge University Press.
  • McConkie, G. W., Zola, D., Grimes, J., Kerr, P. W., Bryant, N. R., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Children's eye movements during reading. Vision and visual dyslexia, 13.
  • Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
  • Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-83.
  • Rayner, K., & McConkie, G.W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements. Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
  • Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological bulletin, 85(3), 618.
  • Rayner, K. (1985). The role of eye movements in learning to read and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 53-60.
  • Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of experimental child psychology, 41(2), 211-236.
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.
  • Rayner, K., & Duffy, S.A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
  • Samuels, S. J. (1988). Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition. The Reading Teacher, 756-760.
  • Scarcella, R. & C. Zimmerman (1998). ESL student performance on a text of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20 (1): 27-49.
  • Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 382-408. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 371- 88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Segalowitz, S. J., Segalowitz, N. S., & Wood, A. G. (1998). Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(01), 53-67.
  • Singer, H. (1981). Teaching the acquisition phase of reading development: An historical perspective. In O. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print, 291-311. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye- tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251-272.
  • Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 53-81.
  • Taylor, S. E. (1965). Eye movements in reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal, 2(4), 187-202.
  • Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N., & North, B. (2009). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Wesche, M. & T. Paribakht (1996). Assessing vocabulary knowledge: depth vs. breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (1): 13-40.
  • Whalen, D. H., & Zsiga, E. C. (1994). Subjective familiarity of English word/name homophones. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26(4), 402-408.
  • Winke, P. M., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. M. (2013a). Eye-Movement Recordings in Second Language Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 205-212.
  • Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2013b). Factors Influencing the Use of Captions by Foreign Language Learners: An Eye-Tracking Study. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 254-275.
  • Zabrucky, K., & Commander, N. E. (1993). Rereading to understand: The role of text coherence and reader proficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(4), 442-454.