Serial third trimester ultrasound examinations in predicting fetal weight

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üçüncü trimesterin değişik haftalarında ve doğumdan hemen önce yapılan ultrasonografik ölçümlerin tahmini fetal ağırlığı tespit etmedekidoğruluğunu belirlemektir. Yöntemler: Toplam 664 hastanın üçüncü trimesterde yapılmış 3 adet ultrasonografik verisi elde edildi ve Hadlock formülü ile tahmini doğum ağırlığı ve persentili hesaplandı. Daha sonra tahmini fetal ağırlık persentilleri, doğumdaki gerçek ağırlık persentili ile karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama anne yaşı 30±4 (18-42) yıl, ilk üçüncü trimester ultrasonunun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 32±0.5 hafta (30.4-33.6 hafta), ikinci ultrasonun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 36±0.4 hafta (35-36.9 hafta), üçüncü ultrasonun yapıldığı hafta ortalaması 38.6±1 hafta (36.3– 42 hafta). Doğumun gerçekleştiği ortalama gebelik haftası 39±1 hafta (36-42 hafta), ortalama doğum kilosu 3422±423 gram (1900-4900 gram). Birinci, ikinci, üçüncü ultrason ölçümlerinde elde edilen persentillerin doğum ağırlığı persentili ile korelasyonu (sırasıyla, r=0.556, p

Ardışık üçüncü trimester ultrason incelemeleri ile fetal ağırlığın tahmin edilmesi

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the ac-curacy of estimated fetal weights obtained by ultrasonog-raphies performed at different weeks in the third trimesterand just before delivery.Methods: A total of 664 patients underwent three serialultrasonographic examinations in the third trimester. Thesonographically estimated fetal weight was calculated us-ing the Hadlock formula and then converted into percen-tiles. The estimated fetal weight percentiles were com-pared with the actual birth weight percentiles at delivery.Results: Mean maternal age was 30±4 years (18-42 years), mean gestational age at first ultrasound was 32±0.5 weeks (30.4-33.6 weeks), mean gestational age at second ultrasound was 36±0.4 weeks (35-36.9 weeks), mean gestational age at third ultrasound was 38.6±1 weeks (36.3– 42 weeks). Mean gestational age at deliv- ery was 39± 1 weeks (36-42 weeks), mean birth weight was 3422±423 grams (1900-4900 grams). Correlation coefficients of estimated fetal weights percentiles at first, second and third ultrasounds were significantly correlated with birth weight percentiles (r=0.556, p

___

  • 1. Heiskanen N, Raatkainen K, Heinonen S. Fetal macrosomia- a continuing obstetric challenge. Biol Neonate 2006;90:98-103.
  • 2. Medchill MT, Peterson CM, Kreinick C, et al. Prediction of estimated fetal weight in extremely low birth weight neonates (500-1000 g). Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:286- 290.
  • 3. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Validation of a birth weight prediction equation based on maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med 2002;47:752-760.
  • 4. Mongelli M, Benzie R. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:500-503.
  • 5. Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, et al. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:72-77
  • 6. Halaska MG, Vlk R, Feldmar P, et al. Predicting term birth weight using ultrasound and maternal character- istics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol 2006;128:231-235
  • 7. Pressman EK, Bienstock JL, Blakemore KJ, et al. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in the third trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:502-506.
  • 8. Krantz C, Hitschold T. Impact and limitations of ultra- sound examination immediately before delivery-a prospective evaluation with 1127 pregnant women. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011;215:69-76.
  • 9. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:28-31.
  • 10. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333-337.
  • 11. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80-89.
  • 12. Larsen T, Greisen G, Petersen S. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound-estimated fetal weight: a comparison between single and repeated estimates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995;60:37-40.
  • 13. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, et al. Accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight in 840 women with different pregnancy complications prior to induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:172-176.
  • 14. Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, et al. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. N Z Med J 20068;119:2146-2149.
  • 15. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, et al. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimete in normal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Biol 2007;130:187- 192.
  • 16. Nelson L, Wharton B, Grobman WA. Prediction of large for gestational age birth weights in diabetic mothers based on early third trimester sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011;30:1625-1628.
  • 17. Kehl RJ, Krew MA, Thomas A, Catalano PM. Fetal growth and body composition in infants of women with diabetes mellitus during pregnancy J Matern Fetal Med 1996;5:273-280.
  • 18. Blann DW, Prien SD. Estimation of fetal weight before and after amniotomy in the laboring gravid woman. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000 ;182:1117-1120.
  • 19. Townsend RR, Filly RA,Callen PW, et al. Factors affecting prenatal sonographic estimation of weight in extremely low birthweight infants. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:183-187.
  • 20.Schild RL, Sachs C, Fimmers R, et al. Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:30-35.
  • 21. Schwarzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, et al. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:23-29.
  • 22. McNamara JM, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG.The effect of breech presentation on the accuracy of estimated fetal weight. Am J Perinat 2012;29:353- 360.
  • 23. Sanchez- Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:997-1002.
  • 24. Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Beck-Fruchter R, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus. Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol 2002;105:20-24.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Sağlık Araştırmaları Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Kabuki makeup sendromlu hastada genel anestezi uygulaması

Ülkü AYPAR, İsmail Aydın ERDEN, Seda Banu AKINCI, Ayhan KÖSEOĞLU, Bekir Suat KÜRKÇÜOĞLU

The relationship between affective disorders and hormonal and metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Uzay GÖRMÜŞ, İlkkan DÜNDER, Nilgün GÜDÜCÜ, Özge Başak KAYAN, Zehra Neşe KAVAK

Serial third trimester ultrasound examinations in predicting fetal weight

Gökçenur GÖNENÇ, İlkkan DÜNDER, Alin Başgül YİĞİTER, Herman İŞÇİ, Nilgün GÜDÜCÜ

İdrar kültürlerinden izole edilen Escherichia coli ve Klebsiella spp. suşlarının genişlemiş spektrumlu beta-laktamaz (GSBL) üretimi ve antibiyotik direnci

Aytekin ÇIKMAN, Barış GÜLHAN, Nadire Seval GÜNDEM

Çıplak stent implantasyonu sonrası gelişen koroner arter psödoanevrizmasının greft stent ile başarılı tedavisi

İsmail KIRLI, Hüseyin Uğur YAZICI, Utku ŞENOL, Farhad RAEDI, Meherrem NASIFOV

Laparoskopik total ekstraperitoneal kasık fıtığı tamiri konvansiyonel yönteme tercih edilebilir mi? Randomize klinik çalışma

Enver İLHAN, Mehmet Akif ÜSTÜNER, Fevzi CENGİZ, Savaş YAKAN, Hacı Osman TANRIVERDİ, Abdullah ŞENLİKÇİ

Stoma ile ilgili komplikasyonların retrospektif analizi

Abdulkadir İSKENDER, İsmet ÖZAYDIN, Ali Kemal TAŞKIN

Gebeliğin akut yağlı karaciğer hastalığı ile karışan akut viral Hepatit A olgusu

Nurullah PEKER, Abdulkadir TURGUT, Senem Yaman TUNÇ, Neval Yaman GÖRÜK, Ali ÖZLER, Recep TEKİN

Sol ana koroner arter stenozu yönetiminde intravasküler ultrasonografi ve multidedektör bilgisayarlı tomografik koroner anjiyografinin klinik kullanımdaki yeri

Emre YALÇINKAYA, Salim YAŞAR, Erkan YILDIRIM, Barış BUGAN

Over torsiyonu ve masif over ödemi manyetik rezonans görüntüleme bulguları

Neşat ÇULLU, Neşe Gül HİLALİ, Adnan İNCEBIYIK, Aysun CAMUZCUOĞLU, Ekrem KARAKAŞ, Ömer KARAKAŞ, Nihat KILIÇASLAN, Fatıma Nurefşan BOYACI