Şemsettin BİLAK, Cemil ÇOLAK, İsa YUVACI, Soner DEMİREL, Tongabay CUMURCU

Objective measurement of refractive errors: Comparison of plusoptix s08 with a standard autorefractometer

Amaç: Çocuklarda ve erişkinlerdeki refraksiyon kusuruölçümünde, Plusoptix S08 ile standart bir oto refraktometre (Topcon RM 8000B) ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması. Yöntemler: Yaş ortalaması 8.06 ± 2.89 yıl olan 110 çocuğun 220 gözü Plusoptix S08 ile sikloplejisiz olarak, Top- con RM-8000B otorefraktometresiyle sikloplejili olarakölçüldü. Elde edilen değerler karşılaştırıldı. Ayrıca, yaşortalaması 33,3 ± 13,4 olan 127 yetişkinin 254 gözü, Plu-soptix S08 ve Topcon RM 8000B otorefraktometre ile sik-loplejisiz olarak ölçülerek, bu ölçümlerin karşılaştırması yapıldı. Tüm ölçümler üç kez tekrarlandı. Ortalama sferik, silindirik, sferik ekivalan ve silindirik aks değerleri istatis- tiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama sferik, silindirik, sferik ekivalan, J0 ve J45 güçleri çocuklarda sırasıyla: –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.25 D (p< 0.001), –0.02 (p= 0.038), 0.00 (p= 0.395) bulundu. Erişkinlerde ise 0.50 (p

Objektif refraksiyon kusuru ölçümü: Plusoptix s08 ile standart bir otorefraktometrenin karşılaştırılması

Objective: Comparison of Plusoptix S08 with a standartautorefractometer (Topcon RM 8000B) in children andadults.Methods: 220 eyes of 110 children, with a mean age of8.06 ± 2.89 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic measurements provided by Plusoptix S08and cycloplegic measurements provided by Topcon RM-8000B autorefractometer. In addition, 254 eyes of 127adults, with a mean age of 33.3 ± 13.36 years old were examined to compare non-cycloplegic refractive mea- surements provided by Plusoptix S08 and Topcon RM 8000B autorefractometer. All measurements were repeat- ed three times. Median sphere, cylinder, spherical equiva- lent and cylindrical axes as Jackson cross cylinder power measurements (J0 and J45) were compared statistically.Results: The median differences in spheres, cylinders, spherical equivalents, J0 and J45 powers were –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.25 D (P< 0.001), –0.02 (P= 0.038), 0.00 (P= 0.395), in children, respec- tively. These values were 0.50 (P

PDF

___

1. Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS. A comparison of autore- fractor performance. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:554-558.
2. Hodi S, Wood IC. Comparison of the techniques of videorefraction and static retinoscopy in the measure- ment of refractive error in infants. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994;14:20-24.
3. Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autore- fraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:68-74.
4. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B.Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:320-324.
5. Kennedy RA, Thomas DE. Evaluation of the iScreen digital screening system for amblyogenic factors. Can J Ophthalmol 2000;35:258-262.
6. Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, et al. Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:637-650
7. Cooper CD, Gole GA, Hall JE, et al. Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and fortune videorefractor. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27:387-398.
8. Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:1441-1454.
9. Paff T, Oudesluys-Murphy AM, Wolterbeek R, et al. Screening for refractive errors in children: the Plusop- tiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. J AAPOS 2010;14:478-483.
10. Schaeffel F, Mathis U, Brüggemann G. Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the “PowerRefractor” in a pediatric practice. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:630-639.
11. Howland HC. Photorefraction of eyes: history and future prospects. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:603-606
12. Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison between the Plusoptix and MTI Photoscreen- ers. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1591-1595.
13. Erdurmuş M, Yagci R, Karadag R, et al. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children. J AA- POS 2007;11:606-611.
14. Rotsos T, Grigoriou D, Kokkolaki A, et al. A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractom- eter in children aged 3 to 15 years. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:429-431.
15. Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, et al. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:49-55.
16. Lai YH, Tseng HY, Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Wang HZ. Uncorrected visual acuity and noncycloplegic autorefraction predict significant refractive errors in taiwanese preschool children. Ophthalmology 2013;120:271- 276.
17. Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:80-85
18. Allen PM, Radhakrishnan H, O’Leary DJ. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:245-251.
19. Choi M, Weiss S, Schaeffel F, et al. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor). Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:537-548.
20. Hunt OA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRe- fractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1504-1508.
21. Abrahamsson M, Ohlsson J, Björndahl M, et al. Clinical evaluation of an eccentric infrared photorefrac- tor: the PowerRefractor. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:605-610.
22. Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the Plusoptix vision screener for the detection of amblyo- pia risk factors in children. J AAPOS 2008;12:490- 492.
23. Arıcı C, Türk A, Ceylan OM, et al. Comparison of refractive errors measured by Plusoptix S08, Potec PRK-6000 and Nidek ARK-30 hand-held autorefrac- tometer in school age children and adult population. Turk J Ophthalmol 2010;40:328-332.