Estimation of Chemical Composition, In Vitro Digestibility and Metabolic Energy of Peanut Straw and Waste of Peanut Oil Production

The objective of this study was to evaluate chemical composition, organic matter digestibility (OMD) and metabolic energy (ME) values of the most cultivated Osmaniye Virginia peanut variety straw, and seed residue and meal which are wastes of peanut oil factory in Osmaniye- Turkey for ruminant nutrition. The levels of OMD and ME of feed samples were determined by in vitro gas production method. The mean organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), nutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) levels of peanut straw, seed residue and meal were estimated as following 92.10, 89.22 and 93.70%; 10.22, 23.16 and 41.25%; 2.30, 8.21 and 6.45%; 51.14, 35.27 and 28.44%; 41.72, 18.83 and 13.20%; 8.77, 6.17 ve 4.71% respectively. OMD%, MEOMD and MEGP MJ/kgDM values of peanut straw, seed residue and meal were determined as 56.12, 61.38 and 71.80; 8.98, 9.82 and 11.49; 7.69, 7.03 and 8.10 respectively. The obtained results show that cultivated Osmaniye Virginia peanut variety straw, seed residue and meal are a very good nutrients source to meet nutritional requirements of ruminant animals.

___

  • AOAC. (2006). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA.
  • Arioglu, H. 2013. Peanut Production. Cukurova University. Faculty of Agriculture, Report of Department of Plant Production. Adana, Turkey.
  • Batal, A. Dale N. & Cafe, M. (2005). Nutrient composition of peanut meal. J. Applied. Poultry Research, 14: 254–257.
  • Blummel, M., Vellaikumar, S., Devulapalli, R., Nigam, S. N., Upadhyaya H. D. & Khan, A. (2005). Preliminary observations on livestock productivity in sheep fed exclusively on haulms from eleven cultivars of groundnut, International Arachis Newsletter, 25: 55–57.
  • Contreras-Govea, F. E., Muck, R. E., Broderick, G. A. & Weimer, P. J. (2013). Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield. Animal Feed Science. Technology, 179,61–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008.
  • Etela, I. & Dung, D. D., (2011). Utilization of stover from six improved dual-purpose groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars by West African Dwarf Sheep. African Journal Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 11 (1): 4538-4545.
  • Feedipedia, (2017). Animal Feed Resources Information System INRA CIRAD AFZ and FAO © 20122016. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/12167. (25 Şubat 2020).
  • Fiorentini G., Carvalho, I. P. C., Messana, J. D., Canesin, R. C., Castagnino, P. S., Lage, J. F., Arcuri, P. B. & Berchielli, T. T. (2015). Effect of lipid sources with different fatty acid profiles on intake, nutrient digestion and ruminal fermentation of feedlot nellore steers. Asian-Australas Journal Animal Science, 28(11), 1583–1591.
  • Garduno-Lugo M. &Olvera-Novoa, M. A. (2008). Potential of the use of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) leaf meal as a partial replacement for fish meal in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Aquaculture Research. 39,1299-1306. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01995.x.
  • Hernández-Garay, A., Sollenberger, L. E., Staples, C. R. & Pedreira, C. G. S. (2004). Florigraze and Arbrook rhizoma peanut as pasture for growing Holstein heifers. Crop Science, 44,1355-1360.
  • Heuzé, V., Thiollet, H., Tran, G., Bastianelli, D. & Lebas, F. (2016). Peanut meal. Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/699 Last updated on October 4, 2016, 10:25
  • Hill, G. M. (2002). Peanut by-products fed to cattle. The Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practices, 18(2), 295-315. doi:10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00019-1.
  • Kirchgessener, M., Kellner, R. J., Roth, F., X. (1977). Zur Schatzung des futterwertes mittels rohfaser und der Zellwandfraktionen der detergentien-analyse. Landwirtsch. Forsch, 30, 245-250.
  • Khan, M.T., Khan, N.A., Bezabih, M., Qureshi, M.S. &Rahman, A. (2012). The nutritional value of peanut hay (Arachis hypogaea L.) as an alternate forage source for sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production.45, 849–853.
  • Menke, K.H., Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Devel. Separate Print, 28, 7-55.
  • Norton, B. W. (2016). The nutritive value of tree legumes. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Pubicat/Gutt-shel/x5556e0j.htm. pp. 1-10.
  • Ozyigit, Y., Bilgen, M. (2013). Forage potential of some groundnut (Arachıs hypogaea L.) cultivars. Romanian Agriculture. Research, 30, 57-63.
  • Pande, S., Bandyopadhyay, R., Blummel, M., Narayana, Rao J., Thomas, D. & Navi, S. S. (2003). Disease management factors influencing yield and quality of sorghum and groundnut crop residues. Field Crops Research, 84, 89-103. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00143-6.
  • Sevim, O. (2013). Influence of Slow-Release Nitrogen and Different Source of Non-Structural Carbohydrates Supplementation to Groundnut Straw on Digestibility and Some Rumen Parameters in Sheep and Goats. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases. PhD Thesis, Aydın, Turkey.
  • Stalker, T. & Wilson, R. F. (2015). Peanuts: Genetics, Processing, and Utilization, Editör: Thomas Stalker and Richard F. Wilson. Acadmic Press and AOCS Press, Published by Elsevier Inc. ISBN 1630670391,9781630670399. pp 498.
  • SAS, 2007. SAS statistic software, SAS campus drive. Cary NC, USA.
  • TUIK (2019). http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001. (25 Şubat 2020)
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J. D. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal Dairy Science. 74, 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
  • Van Soest, P.J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2. ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press,476p.