Master–Slave Dialectic and Morality in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle

The Man in the High Castle (1962) is one of Philip K. Dick’s most acclaimed and striking novels. The narrative is set in an alternate reality where the Axis powers have won the Second World War and occupied the United States, dividing the country into three regions: the Nazi ruled greater Reich, the Pacific Japanese States and the neutral zone. As a result of this partition, Americans have become foreign in their own country. This article examines the master-slave dialectic and master-slave morality in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle. The master-slave dialectic is a theory proposed by Hegel in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Hegel outlines a mutual relationship where he assigns specific roles to two parties that engage in a struggle for desire to achieve self-consciousness. In direct connection with the master-slave dialectic is Nietzsche’s master-slave morality which was developed upon Hegel’s original conception. The thinker describes a binary opposition where particular values have been ascribed to master and slave/servant morality to establish a sustainable and reciprocal relationship. This study aims to analyze Dick’s The Man in the High Castle from a philosophical perspective, attempting to expose the master-slave dialectic and morality in the work of fiction and thus revealing the author’s covert messages implied in the subtext of the novel, while at the same time comparing and contrasting these with the television adaptation.

Keywords:

Philip K. Dick, The Man in the High Castle, Master-Slave Dialectic, GWF. Hegel Friedrich Nietzsche,

PDF

___

Brandom, Robert B. A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel’s Phenomenology. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2019.
Burton, James E. The Philosophy of Science Fiction: Henri Bergson and the Fabulations of Philip K. Dick. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015. Cole, Andrew. “What Hegel’s Master/Slave Dialectic Really Means.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, 2004, pp. 577-610.
Deleuze, Gilles, et al. “The Master–Slave Dialectic in Literary Theory.” Hegel and the Foundations of Literary Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 182 - 202.
Dick, Philip K. The Man in the High Castle. Penguin Books, 2014. DiTommaso, Lorenzo. “Redemption in Philip K. Dick’s ‘The Man in the High Castle’.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, 1999, p. 91–119, www.jstor.org/stable/4240754.
Evans, Timothy H. “Authenticity, Ethnography, and Colonialism in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle.” Journal of the Fantastic in the Art, vol. 21, no. 3, 2010, pp. 366-383, www. jstor.org/stable/24352269.
Everett, Justin, and Paul Halpern. “Spacetime as a Multicursal Labyrinth in Literature with Application to Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle.” Kronoscope, vol. 13, no. 1, 2013, pp. 47-66.
“Fallout.” The Man in the High Castle, Produced by Ridley Scott, and Frank Spotnitz, season 2, episode 10, Amazon Studios, 16 Dec. 2016.
Master–Slave Dialectic and Morality in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle 132 Farivar, Marziyeh, et al. “Hegelian Master-Slave Dialectics: Lord Byron’s Sardanapalus.” English Language and Literature Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013.
Greene, Murray. “Hegel’s ‘Unhappy Consciousness’ and Nietzsche’s ‘Slave Morality’.” Hegel and the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Darrel E. Christensen, Springer, 1970, pp. 125-155, link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-011-9152-4_5.
Habib, M.A.R. Hegel and Empire: From Postcolonialism to Globalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
Hegel, Georg W. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge UP, 2018.
---. Hegel’s System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of Spirit. SUNY P, 1979.
---. The Philosophy of Right. Focus Publishing/R. Pullins Company, 2002.
Houlgate, Stephen. Hegel’s ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’: A Reader’s Guide. Bloomsbury, 2013.
Kojève, Alexandre. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. Cornell University Press, 1980.
Krajewski, Bruce, and Joshua Heter. The Man in the High Castle and Philosophy: Subversive Reports from Another Reality. Open Court Chicago, 2017.
Kucukalic, Lejla. Philip K. Dick: Canonical Writer of the Digital Age. Routledge, 2009.
Lindstedt, David. “The Progression and regression of slave morality in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: The moralization of bad conscience and indebtedness.” Man and World, no. 30, 1997, pp. 83-105.
Meredith, Thomas. “The Radical Goals of Slave Morality in Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality.” The Review of Politics, vol. 82, no. 2, 2020, pp. 247-268.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Cambridge UP, 2001.
---. On the Genealogy of Morality. Translated by Maudemarie Clark and Alan J. Swensen, Hackett Publishing Company, 1998.
Rossi, Umberto. “All Around the High Castle: Narrative Voices and Fictional Visions in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle.” Telling the Stories of America - History, Literature and the Arts - Proceedings of the 14th AISNA Biennial conference, Roma, Nuova Arnica, 2000, pp. 474-483.
Snelson, Avery. “The history, origin, and meaning of Nietzsche’s slave revolt in morality.” Inquiry, vol. 60, no. 1-2, 2017, pp. 1-30.
Şekerci, Mehmet F. “Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic and The Relationship between God and Believer.” Bilgi, no. 34, 2017, pp. 148-160, dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bilgisosyal/ issue/29145/313918.
Warrick, Patricia. “The Encounter of Taoism and Fascism in Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 1980, pp. 174-190, www.jstor.org/stable/4239329. Williams, Robert R. Tragedy, Recognition, and the Death of God: Studies in Hegel and Nietzsche. Oxford UP, 2012.
Wittkower, Dylan E. Philip K. Dick and Philosophy: Do Androids Have Kindred Spirits? Open Court Publishing, 2011.