___

• Akarsu, F. (2004). Gifted and talented. In R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu, & A. E. Bilgili (Eds.), A book of selected articles about gifted children (pp. 97-103). Istanbul, Turkey: Children’s Foundation.
• Ataman, A. (1998). Üstün Zekâlılar ve Üstün Yetenekliler, Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları, 183-185.
• Basmacı, S. K. (1998). Investigation of perceptions of the university students’ problem- solving skills based on different variables. [in Turkish üniversite öğrencilerinin problem çözme becerilerini algılamalarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi]. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Inönü, Malatya.
• Bingham, A. (1958). Improving children's facility in problem-solving (No. 16). Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
• Cutts N. E., & Moseley, N. (2001). Education of gifted and talented children. Ankara: Özgür Publications
• Çakıroğlu, Ü., Sarı, E., & Akkan, Y. (2011). The view of the teachers about the contribution of teaching programming to the gifted students in the problem-solving. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, (22- 24 September), Elazığ: Fırat University.
• Çam, S. (1997). The effect of communication skills training programme with teacher candidates on ego states and perception of problem solving skill [in Turkish iletişim becerileri eğitimi programının öretmen adaylarının ego durumlarına ve problem çözme becerisi algılarına etkisi]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ankara University; Ankara
• Çapan, E. B. (2010) Metaphoric sensations of teacher candidates about gifted students. International Social Researches Journal, 3(12), 140-154.
• Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Enç, M. (2005). Outstanding brain power. Ankara: Gündüz Education and Publications
• Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Freeman, J. (1999). Teaching gifted pupils. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 185-190.
• Genç, H., & Küçük, M. (2003). A case study on the application of the student centered science education program. [in Turkish Öğrenci Merkezli Fen Bilgisi Öğretim Programının Uygulanması Üzerine Bir Durum Tespit Çalışması]. In Proceedings of XII. Educational Sciences Congress, Antalya (pp. 1555-1572).
• Gökçe, İ. (2006). Evaluation of the inner valume of the science and technology curriculum and teacher’s guide and the problems faced in the practice (Balıkesir Example). [in Turkish fen ve teknoloji dersi programı ile öğretmen kılavuzunun içsel olarak değerlendirilmesi ve uygulamada karşılaşılan sorunlar (Balıkesir örneği)]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
• Hedricks, K. B. (2009). The impact of ability grouping on achievement, self-efficacy and classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden Univerity, Walden.
• Heppner, P. P., & Baker, C. E. (1997). Applications of the Problem-solving Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 229-241.
• Heppner, P. P., & Krauskopf, C. J. (1987). An information-processing approach to personal problem-solving. The Counseling Psychologist, 15, 371-447.
• Johnsen, S. K., & Ryser, G. R. (1996). An overview of effective practices with gifted students in general-education settings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 379-404.
• Johnson, D. T., Boyce, L. N., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (1995). Science curriculum review: Evaluating materials for high-ability learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(1), 36-43.
• Kanli E., & Emir S. (2009). The effect of problem based learning in science and technology to the motivation levels of gifted and normal students. [in Turkish Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin üstün zekalı ve normal öğrencilerin motivasyon düzeylerine etkisi]. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 42-60.
• Katkat, D. (2001). The comparing with the skills of problem solving from the perspective of different variables for the teacher candidates. [in Turkish öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme becerilerinin çesitli değiskenler bakımından karsılastırılması.] Unpublished master’s thesis, Erzurum University, Erzurum.
• Kozandağı, İ. (2001). The Problems faced in the curriculum of science lesson in the fourth and fifth classes of the elementary schools and the solution suggestions according to the opinions of the teachers. [in Turkish Öğretmen görüşlerine göre ilköğretim okulları 4. ve 5. sınıf fen bilgisi öğretim programlarında karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
• Lefcourt, H. J., & Loughlin, H. M. (1966). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 206-220
• Özmen, Ş. G. (2003). Surveying of science teachers opinions on constructivist learning approach [in Turkish fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi].Unpublished master’s thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Renzulli, J. S. (1998). A rising tide lifts all ships. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 104.
• Rotigel, J., & Fello, S. (2004). Mathematically gifted students: How can we meet their needs? Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 46–51.
• Rotter, J. B. (1978). Generalized expectancies for problem-solving and psychotherapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2(1), 1-10.
• Saygılı, H. (2000). The examination of relationship between the skill of problem solving and social and individual adjustment. [in Turkish Problem çözme becerisi ile sosyal ve kişisel uyum arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
• Saygılı, G. (2014). Problem-solving skills employed by gifted children and their peers in public primary schools in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 53-63.
• Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 163-173). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Serin, O., Bulut Serin, N., & Saygılı, G. (2010). Developing Problem Solving Inventory for Children at the Level of Primary Education (PSIC). [in Turkish İlköğretim düzeyindeki Çocuklar için Problem Çözme Envanteri'nin (ÇPÇE) geliştirilmesi]. İlköğretim Online, 9(2). 446-458.
• Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1997). Mental speed is not the ‘basic’ process of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(1), 69-84.
• Şahin, Z. (2000). A comparative study on children’ psychosocial based problem solving skills in terms of various variables. [in Turkish çocukların psiko-sosyal temelli problem çözme becerilerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6, 451-471.
• Taylan, S. (1990). Adaptation, credibility and validity studies of Heppner’s problem-solving inventory. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara Universit, Ankara.
• Terzi Işık, Ş. (2000). Investigation of sixth grade students’ perceptions of interpersonal problem solving skills in terms of some variables. [in Turkish İlköğretim Okulu Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Kişilerarası Problem Çözme Beceri Algılarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Toluk, Z., Olkun, S. (2001). An Examination of Elementary School Textbooks in terms of Developing Problem Solving Skills. [in Turkish ilköğretim ders kitaplarının problem çözme becerilerinin geliştirilmesi açısından incelenmesi.] X. Educatinoal Science Congress, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Ülger, Ö. E. (2003). The Relationship Between Leadership Behaviours and Problem solving Abilities of School Managers. [in Turkish okul yöneticilerinin problem çözme becerilerinin liderlik davranışlarıyla ilişkisi.] Unpublished master’s thesis, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Wilson, S. (2000). Construct validity and reliability of a performance assessment rubric to measure student understanding and problem-solving in college physics: Implications for public accountability in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
• Winebrenner, S. (2000). Gifted students need an education, too. Educational Leadership, 52-56. Yangın, S., & Dindar, H. (2007). The perceptions of teachers about the change on elementary school science and technology curriculum. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 240-255.
• Yoon, C. H. (2009). Self-regulated learning and instructional factors in the scientific inquiry of scientifically gifted Korean middle school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 203-216.